https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252645
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-File-MimeInfo-0.34-1.f |perl-File-MimeInfo-0.34-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239168
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-GnuPG-Interface-1.03
On Mo, 11.12.23 11:10, DJ Delorie (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering writes:
> > Well, as you might be aware many distributions these days do more than
> > "files dns" for "hosts", and similar for the other databases, and
> > hence a built-in default in glibc is great, but most
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F40Boost183
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F40Boost183
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Podman5
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Podman5
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:14:03AM -, Felix Wang wrote:
> I opened an releng issue about this. [1] At the time of writing, I noticed
> that there is probably an similar issue of failure of package creation
> appeared. [2] Hope anyone can help me solve the problem, which maybe the
> cause of
Hello,
OpenSSL 3.0.0 deprecated the support for using engines and introduced the
concept of providers.
If your package requires openssl-pkcs11 (libp11, engine_pkcs11), we
recommend that you stop using it, and migrate to using the pkcs11-provider
instead. We plan to deprecate and remove
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-12-13 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@chat.fedoraproject.org
The meeting will be about:
https://chat.fedoraproject.org/#/room/#meeting:fedoraproject.org
This is the weekly EPEL Steering
Hello,
I am writing this email to get feedback from the members of the Fedora
development community about OpenScanHub for Fedora.
# tl;dr
OpenScanHub does static and dynamic analysis of rpm packages and it may be
helpful in the Fedora community. Please take a look at our staging proof of
Hello Rafel
I'm also a mathematician and I'm happy to see other people from mathematics
get involved with Fedora
Until you not become a Fedora maintainer (I hope you find a sponsor soon!)
we can work together
As a Fedora maintainer I think I can check and merge your PRs.
Priscila.
On Sun, Dec
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231211.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231212.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 91
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.40 GiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
I opened an releng issue about this. [1] At the time of writing, I noticed that
there is probably an similar issue of failure of package creation appeared. [2]
Hope anyone can help me solve the problem, which maybe the cause of my personal
issue, or other factors. Thanks in advance.
[1]
In one week (2023-12-19) or a little later I will update biosig4c++ to
version 2.5.2 in rawhide. This will bring an soname bump. However, there
are no consuming packages, making this a self contained change.
Cheers,
--
Sandro
FAS: gui1ty
IRC: Penguinpee
Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee
--
* Jonathan Wakely:
>> Missing an include directory isn't necessarily the problem though, it
>> is the missing headers that aren't present when they are included
>> that would be - and that should trigger a build error for the missing
>> file. What advantage does failing on this warning provide
16 matches
Mail list logo
