[Bug 2262902] perl-Mail-SPF-3.20240206 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262902 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-SPF-3.20240206-1.

[Bug 2262902] perl-Mail-SPF-3.20240206 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262902 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2262917] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240206.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202

[Bug 2262917] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240206.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2262917] New: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240206.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262917 Bug ID: 2262917 Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240206.001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data Keywords:

[Bug 2262902] New: perl-Mail-SPF-3.20240206 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262902 Bug ID: 2262902 Summary: perl-Mail-SPF-3.20240206 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mail-SPF Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2262902] perl-Mail-SPF-3.20240206 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262902 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2015293 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2015293=edit Update to 3.20240206 (#2262902) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2262902] perl-Mail-SPF-3.20240206 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262902 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-fo70wkbl/perl-Mail-SPF.spec']'

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3f1f3dcef0 wordpress-5.1.18-1.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-afdec12596 libebml-1.3.9-2.el7 1

[Bug 2262901] New: perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262901 Bug ID: 2262901 Summary: perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-LWP-Protocol-https Keywords:

[Bug 2262363] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262363 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-d94840542e has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

bodhi push error

Hi, Has anybody seen this error before: FEDORA-2024-310c0537ac ejected from the push because "Cannot find relevant tag for gromacs-2023.4-1.fc39. None of ['f39-updates', 'f39-updates-pending'] are in ['epel9-next-testing', 'epel7-testing', 'eln-updates-testing', 'epel8-testing', 'epel9-testing',

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:56:30AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:33:52AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:34:13AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > > And even before that, things were already only limping along. That was > > > >

[Bug 2262363] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.62 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262363 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-0d92c2c65d has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:33:52AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:34:13AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > And even before that, things were already only limping along. That was > > > happening for over a decade and in that timeframe *nobody* has wanted >

Planned Outage - server updates - 2024-02-07 22:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2024-02-07 22:00UTC, which will last approximately 6 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-02-07 22:00UTC' Reason for outage: We will be applying updates and

Planned Outage - server updates - 2024-02-07 22:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2024-02-07 22:00UTC, which will last approximately 6 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-02-07 22:00UTC' Reason for outage: We will be applying updates and

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 4 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28. Since

Orphaning my last Google Cloud packages

Hey there, I orphaned quite a few of Google's Python SDKs recently and I'm ready to orphan some of the last few Google-related packages: golang-github-googlecloudplatform-guest-logging google-compute-engine-guest-configs google-disk-expand google-guest-agent google-osconfig-agent The

Re: [heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.9.0 with soname bump on rawhide

On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is > finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we > have any thing that prevent to proceeding. > mass rebuild started on side-tag

[Bug 2257106] F40FailsToInstall: perl-WWW-Google-Contacts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257106 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Fails To Install --- Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please

[Bug 2257106] F40FailsToInstall: perl-WWW-Google-Contacts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257106 Fedora Fails To Install changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(avibrazil@gmail.c | |om)

[Bug 2257106] F40FailsToInstall: perl-WWW-Google-Contacts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257106 Fedora Fails To Install changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(avibrazil@gmail.c

[EPEL-devel] Bodhi 8.0.2 deployed to prod today

Hello, I'd like to announce that Bodhi 8.0.2 has been deployed today and brings a feature which was requested specifically for EPEL: from now on (if everything works as expected) all builds submitted as buildroot overrides for EPEL9 will also be tagged as buildroot overrides for EPEL9N. This is

Bodhi 8.0.2 deployed to prod

Hello folks, we (well, mostly kevin) have just deployed Bodhi 8.0.2 in prod. There are several changes in the background, but what can be of some interest for you, users and developers, are these points: - Fixed “cannot access local variable ‘tags’” error when editing flatpak updates -

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-11fae9c7fb python-aiohttp-3.7.4-2.el8 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-131343ad4f libebml-1.3.9-2.el8 The following builds have

Re: Fw: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > Hi, > > could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please > see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone > mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from > the regular

[Bug 2262786] Upgrade perl-Mail-SPF to 3.20240205

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262786 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Rawhide Beta Everything.iso and other ISOs -- btrfs -- serious issue

That sounds like this Common Issue: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/its-difficult-to-reformat-a-btrfs-partition-subvolume-in-the-installer/89052 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 2262786] Upgrade perl-Mail-SPF to 3.20240205

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262786 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[HEADS UP] [SONAME BUMP] libcbor will be updated to 0.11.0 in rawhide with a soname bump

libcbor will be updated to 0.11.0 in rawhide in the next week or so, which includes a soname bump. The list of affected packages in rawhide are: libfido2 fwupd I will rebuild libfido2. For fwupd, I will need the maintainers (CC'ed) or a proven packager's assistance. I have used the Mass

[rpms/perl-Mail-SPF] PR #2: 3.20240205 bump; Package tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Mail-SPF` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 3.20240205 bump; Package tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mail-SPF/pull-request/2 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Fw: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available

Hi, could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated. Thanks,

[rpms/perl-Mail-SPF] PR #2: 3.20240205 bump; Package tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Mail-SPF` that you are following: `` 3.20240205 bump; Package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mail-SPF/pull-request/2 -- ___ perl-devel

Rawhide Beta Everything.iso and other ISOs -- btrfs -- serious issue

I am not registered as an official test person. But I have been using Fedora for the past 20 years. I have been doing some tests with  KDE,Gnome,xfce (all Fedora Rawhide distros). With the Everything.iso, here is an example of a problem I have a previous kde/gnome/kde installation that has

[rawhide] libjpeg-turbo soname bump

In a few days, I'll start with bumping libjpeg-turbo in rawhide from 2.1.4 to 3.0.2 ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libjpeg-turbo/pull-request/2 ). soname bump (0.2.0 to 0.3.0) is just for the turbojpeg consumers, libjpeg so stays the same - API and ABI compatible, it's a drop-in

[Bug 2262788] Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.72

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262788 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ppi...@redhat.com | Status|NEW

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240205.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240203.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240205.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 7 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:9 Upgraded packages: 145 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 65.56 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Figure out what killed an app (rhbz#2253099)

On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 14:31 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Yanko Kaneti: > > > On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 13:29 +0100, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 17:52, Yanko Kaneti wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 09:44 +0100, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 1 Feb

[Bug 2262788] New: Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.72

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262788 Bug ID: 2262788 Summary: Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.72 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Prima Status: NEW Component: perl-Prima

[Bug 2262786] New: Upgrade perl-Mail-SPF to 3.20240205

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262786 Bug ID: 2262786 Summary: Upgrade perl-Mail-SPF to 3.20240205 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mail-SPF Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2262785] New: Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 12.76

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262785 Bug ID: 2262785 Summary: Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 12.76 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Image-ExifTool Status: NEW

[Bug 2262784] New: Upgrade perl-CGI-Simple to 1.281

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262784 Bug ID: 2262784 Summary: Upgrade perl-CGI-Simple to 1.281 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/CGI-Simple Status: NEW Component:

Re: Figure out what killed an app (rhbz#2253099)

* Yanko Kaneti: > On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 13:29 +0100, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 17:52, Yanko Kaneti wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 09:44 +0100, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: >> > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 09:13, Milan Crha wrote: >> > > > The kernel tracing log for sig==9

Re: Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20240116.0 coming to F40/Rawhide

The rebuild is complete, and the side tag is merged via [1]. As of this writing, it is waiting on test gating. Including parlaylib was an error on my part, since it is header-only and none of its binary packages depend on abseil-cpp. Nevertheless, parlaylib started to FTBFS in Rawhide after

Re: Retirement of sundials2 seqan seqan2 wise2

Hi! On Saturday, 03 February 2024 at 22:01, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Hi all. > > Following packages will be retired in Rawhide branch: [...] > wise2 (unmaintained by upstream, no longer needed in Fedora), > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wise2 Can you drop my name from Bugzilla

Re: Mounting USB Storage devices with "sync" option ?

On Friday, 2 February 2024 21:47:00 GMT Dominique Martinet wrote: > So I think Florian is correct in that barriers won't be issued on > these disks, and if they internally have such a cache it'd probably be > unsafe... > > Now does the disk itself know that it's in such an enclosure and >

Re: Introduction

On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 11:07:43PM +, Luis Correia wrote: > Hi, I'm a long time Fedora user and used to help develop the Ralink > Wireless driver (rt2x00) that's been present in the kernel for a long time. > > I'm now entering the process of helping maintain the mixxx package over at >

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 03:55:42AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > I can, though, speak for myself, and I am frankly surprised that you are > offended by the tone of my messages. Kevin, thank you for the way you're participating in this thread. Your civil tone and patience and writing

Re: [Test-Announce] 2024-02-05 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

I would like to discuss about https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247872 In connection with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258764 and how to proceed with this. As far as we know now, there is a config parameter to turn on/off whether a vgscan/vgchange/etc should

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:34:13AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > And even before that, things were already only limping along. That was > > happening for over a decade and in that timeframe *nobody* has wanted > > to step up and work on it. Wayland is the future because otherwise we > > have no

Upcomming passwd utility change

Hi guys, As a part of the libuser deprecation effort [1] we are going to replace passwd in Fedora (now coming from separate project) with the one coming from shadow utils. The utilities are pretty the same but there are minor