https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266094
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266094
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266094
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Beginning with version 2.1.1, the license of python-email-validator has
changed from CC0-1.0 to Unlicense.
Note that CC0-1.0 is no longer allowed for code in Fedora, but
python-email-validator was covered by the exception for pre-existing
code in Fedora.
Version 2.1.1 will be built as an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265547
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-5febc63a9a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265425
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-5febc63a9a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c2135dc540
3proxy-0.9.4-2.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
chromium-122.0.6261.69-1.el7
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265425
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3aa7c10eb3 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265547
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On 2/26/24 1:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It's a bit unfortunate that Rust used the shebang syntax here,
> although in practice they couldn't be confused as these files
> shouldn't ever be executable.
It's _possible_ to play comment tricks for executable rust scripts,
because rustc allows
Hello,
On Monday, February 26, 2024 4:38:35 PM EST Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I've run across a strange problem building a package that has some rust
> > files in it. The build goes fine until the end when it starts to check for
> > shebangs. It ends like this:
> >
> >
> >
https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html
If I understand this page of The Rust Reference correctly,
then moving the #![no_std] attribute from the first line of the file
shouldn't break anything. So you can try side-stepping the issue
by patching the file and adding "// lol pointless
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 04:25:02PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've run across a strange problem building a package that has some rust files
> in it. The build goes fine until the end when it starts to check for
> shebangs.
> It ends like this:
>
>
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024, 22:25 Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've run across a strange problem building a package that has some rust
> files
> in it. The build goes fine until the end when it starts to check for
> shebangs.
> It ends like this:
>
>
>
Hello,
I've run across a strange problem building a package that has some rust files
in it. The build goes fine until the end when it starts to check for shebangs.
It ends like this:
/usr/src/debug/suricata-7.0.3-1.fc41.x86_64/rust/vendor/alloc-no-stdlib/src/
lib.rs has shebang which doesn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266177
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Test-Inter-1.11-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=114091747
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266177
Bug ID: 2266177
Summary: perl-Test-Inter-1.11 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-Inter
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266177
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 2019027
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2019027=edit
Update to 1.11 (#2266177)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
In Fedora 40, Podman has undergone a major version upgrade to v5 [1],
introducing some breaking changes. Notably, CNI networking support has been
discontinued in favor of Netavark, and cgroups v1 support has been
deprecated in favor of cgroups v2.
To know whether your nodes are affected, you can
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-02-26/fesco.2024-02-26-19.35.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-02-26/fesco.2024-02-26-19.35.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266126
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-SNMP-Info-3.97-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=114089466
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266126
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-SNMP-Info-3.96 is |perl-SNMP-Info-3.97 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266126
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 2019013
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2019013=edit
Update to 3.97 (#2266126)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:32:44AM -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> Welcome!
>
> Since name collisions are fun, I want to clarify for everyone else that
> we are not the same person. I'm jistone, he's jostone, and I'm sure this
> won't confuse anyone... :)
>
You should sponsor jostone for extra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266150
Bug ID: 2266150
Summary: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Welcome!
Since name collisions are fun, I want to clarify for everyone else that
we are not the same person. I'm jistone, he's jostone, and I'm sure this
won't confuse anyone... :)
On 2/23/24 6:23 AM, Joshua Stone wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been a Linux user since my friends showed me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266126
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-SNMP-Info-3.96-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=114085372
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266126
Bug ID: 2266126
Summary: perl-SNMP-Info-3.96 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SNMP-Info
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266126
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 2018983
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2018983=edit
Update to 3.96 (#2266126)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266105
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 2018969
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2018969=edit
Update to 1.29 (#2266105)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266105
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-324a9c52/perl-Flickr-API.spec']'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266105
Bug ID: 2266105
Summary: perl-Flickr-API-1.29 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Flickr-API
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 26. 02. 24 18:08, Christopher wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 6:13 AM Michal Konecny wrote:
[snip]
It's usually good to wait for some time and try again. If the issue persists
you can open ticket on
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues
Michal
I did try over the course of a few
Hmm it looks like I really do need to update everything to LTS 22 to
achieve the pandoc rebase properly (since it needs newer Haskell tls).
Here's one more package review:
toml-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266093
needed by the typst library.
Jens
--
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 6:13 AM Michal Konecny wrote:
[snip]
> It's usually good to wait for some time and try again. If the issue persists
> you can open ticket on
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues
>
> Michal
I did try over the course of a few hours. It wasn't until 3 days later
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266094
Bug ID: 2266094
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.209 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib
Keywords:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 4:51 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> Hi Jonathan!
>
> On 2/13/24 16:47, Jonathan Lebon wrote:
>
> Has it got fixed during the time? Or is there a new technology which
> would do the trick for Silverblue and Fedora Linux alike?
>
> Just a note: I would say "for Silverblue and
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 09:54, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 15:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > * 23711 spec files in Fedora
>
> I was looking through the list for any of my packages, and I've found
> that I'm "maintaining" long dead packages like
>
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 15:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> * 23711 spec files in Fedora
I was looking through the list for any of my packages, and I've found
that I'm "maintaining" long dead packages like
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/GConf2
According to that I have "commit" ACLs, but I
> I see that the `/usr/bin/dnf5` doesn't exist in the
> `/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap`. Do you know how to
> fix it?
Now the error `/usr/bin/dnf5` doesn't exist in the
`/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap` came from a cache.
When I ran the following commands, I was able
Hi,
I restored the /etc/mock
```
$ rpm -q mock-core-configs
mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39.noarch
$ sudo dnf upgrade mock-core-configs
$ rpm -q mock-core-configs
mock-core-configs-40.2-1.fc39.noarch
```
I needed to copy the logging.ini manually, as I saw an error related
to this file when
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265953
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-f21fb72a29 (perl-Encode-3.21-505.fc40) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-f21fb72a29
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265953
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 8:38 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone know why distriobuildsync-eln has started building liborc and libarrow
> again?
>
> They were stopped at one point, but now they have started again.
>
> There are not needed for ceph in ELN.
>
They're getting pulled into
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266016
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-4e6d1dae24 (perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.210-1.fc40) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4e6d1dae24
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266016
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Hi,
Anyone know why distriobuildsync-eln has started building liborc and
libarrow again?
They were stopped at one point, but now they have started again.
There are not needed for ceph in ELN.
--
Kaleb
--
___
devel mailing list --
OLD: Fedora-40-20240225.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240226.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 71
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.71 MiB
Size of dropped packages:146.25 KiB
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 8:22 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
>
> Another day, another needed package (this would also be part of the postponed
> Stackage LTS 22 change):
> I forgot that pandoc > 3.1.3 had moved to the new crypton stack that replaces
> cryptonite:
>
> crypton:
Another day, another needed package (this would also be part of the
postponed Stackage LTS 22 change):
I forgot that pandoc > 3.1.3 had moved to the new crypton stack that
replaces cryptonite:
crypton: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266044
Next would be crypton-x509...
Is it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265313
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3eb9aec7c1 (perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap-2024.001-1.fc40) has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3eb9aec7c1
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265313
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On 2/26/24 12:13, Michal Konecny wrote:
On 24. 02. 24 12:30, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
...
So I sometimes have issues logging in. For example it happened about
5 minutes ago, but the error isn't very interesting:
Original
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265230
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-cd4a399bb4 (perl-perlfaq-5.20240218-1.fc40) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-cd4a399bb4
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266016
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265230
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265230
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265788
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265788
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265229
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-02-26 19:30 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 26
February at 1300UTC in the NeuroFedora channel on Matrix. The meeting
is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us
over:
Matrix in the Fedora meeting channel:
On 24. 02. 24 12:30, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
...
So I sometimes have issues logging in. For example it happened about
5 minutes ago, but the error isn't very interesting:
Original
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266016
Bug ID: 2266016
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.210 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265547
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-5febc63a9a (perl-RDF-RDFa-Generator-0.204-1.fc38) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5febc63a9a
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265547
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3aa7c10eb3 (perl-RDF-RDFa-Generator-0.204-1.fc39) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3aa7c10eb3
--
You are receiving
Dne 25. 02. 24 v 18:02 Ralf Corsépius napsal(a):
Am 24.02.24 um 10:12 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/24/24 00:47, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 23.02.24 um
67 matches
Mail list logo
