The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
csdiff-3.2.2-1.el7
Details about builds:
csdiff-3.2.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-440059f10f)
Non-interactive tools for processing code scan
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-b002585dd2
openssl3-3.2.1-1.1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
bitcoin-core-26.1-1.el8
csdiff-3.2.2-1.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277236
Bug ID: 2277236
Summary: perl-experimental-0.032 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-experimental
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277224
Bug ID: 2277224
Summary: perl-File-MimeInfo-0.35 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-MimeInfo
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277217
Bug ID: 2277217
Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000162 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test2-Suite
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277213
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Devel-Size-0.84-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116874037
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277213
Bug ID: 2277213
Summary: perl-Devel-Size-0.84 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-Size
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277213
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 2029212
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2029212=edit
Update to 0.84 (#2277213)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:42:57AM GMT, Jan Kolarik wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Does this mean that distro-upgrade from F41 to F42 is supposed to work
> > at F41 release time (ideally at beta time)?
> >
>
> Yes, the system-upgrade functionality should be available before the Fedora
> 41
>
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:48:46AM GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> There's also the effort of distribuiting and archiving a few
> additional gigabytes, putting up the links on the website and browsing
> through them, some additional time and and additional step that can
> fail during
On 4/24/24 11:14 AM, Aoife Moloney wrote:
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Mandatory_Requires_on_JRE
Announced -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-drop-mandatory-requires-on-jre-system-wide/114186
[snip]
=== Context ===
Java packages are
Hi Jan,
On Thu Apr 25, 2024 at 07:42 +0200, Jan Kolarik wrote:
> We've prepared a side-tag for testing Rawhide with dnf5 as the default
> package manager. Instructions for installing the packages from the side-tag
> can be found at the following link [1].
> [1]
The side tag is nearly complete. I have finished rebuilding all of the
packages in “my” list for openexr except Blender (which I’ll tackle soon).
I discovered that an ABI-incompatible update was committed to the
Rawhide branch for OpenColorIO, but never built, about two months ago.
Since I
On 11-04-2024 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11. 04. 24 11:55, Sandro wrote:
While I ponder those thoughts some more, moving forward in either
direction, the next step would be writing a change proposal?
I'd start by:
Packaging pynose without hacks (only making it Conflict with nose, no
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240424.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240425.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:13
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 34.48 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 5:31 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 12:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:49 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:33:51PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:26
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 12:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:49 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:33:51PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:26 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:49 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:33:51PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:26 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 04:57:40PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > > > Wiki -
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 02:19:36AM -, Matthew Krupcale wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am interested in taking ownership of the unison package [1]. The
> most recent discussion on this topic of which I'm aware is from
> 2018-05 [2], which was attempting to bring all of the various unison
> versions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276620
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Curses-1.44-7.fc41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261448
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261448
Bug 2261448 depends on bug 2276620, which changed state.
Bug 2276620 Summary: perl-Curses fails to build on i686 architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276620
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276620
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261448
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from
Hello Michael,
Does this mean that distro-upgrade from F41 to F42 is supposed to work
> at F41 release time (ideally at beta time)?
>
Yes, the system-upgrade functionality should be available before the Fedora
41
release date. We're planning extensive testing for this, including a Fedora
Testing
Hi Mattia,
Yep, there's a dnf5-testing COPR that serves exactly this purpose:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf5-testing.
Jan
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:10 AM Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 25/04/24 07:42, Jan Kolarik ha
Jan Kolarik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-04-25 07:42:10:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We've prepared a side-tag for testing Rawhide with dnf5 as the default
> package manager. Instructions for installing the packages from the side-tag
> can be found at the following link [1].
>
> Please provide feedback in
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:18 AM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez <
carlosrodrifernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, I see what the problem is.
>
> The task is for 2.69-8 [1], but the subtask runs for 2.69-3 first to
> then have a reference for the diff. So I guess it will work next time a
> new
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:12 AM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez <
carlosrodrifernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Siteshwar,
>
> Thank you for the report. The libcap subtask failed [1] for a known
> issue, which is present in libcap 2.69-3 in Fedora rawhide, but was
> already fixed two weeks ago. Fedora
Il 25/04/24 07:42, Jan Kolarik ha scritto:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We've prepared a side-tag for testing Rawhide with dnf5 as the default
> package manager. Instructions for installing the packages from the
> side-tag can be found at the following link [1].
>
> Please provide feedback in Bodhi or
30 matches
Mail list logo
