[Bug 2184301] perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc39 FTBFS: t/01_basic.t and 3 more tests fail

2024-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Release Engineering --- Dear Maintainer, your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 39. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and

[Bug 2277213] perl-Devel-Size-0.84 is available

2024-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277213 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-Size-0.84-1.fc41 |perl-Devel-Size-0.84-1.fc41

[Bug 2277224] perl-File-MimeInfo-0.35 is available

2024-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277224 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-File-MimeInfo-0.35-1.f |perl-File-MimeInfo-0.35-1.f

[Bug 2277236] perl-experimental-0.032 is available

2024-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277236 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-experimental-0.032-1.f |perl-experimental-0.032-1.f

Re: Need SELinux help for fail2ban!

2024-05-04 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/4/24 2:58 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 4:49 PM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez mailto:carlosrodrifernan...@gmail.com>> wrote: The suggestion for one of the comments of using `/run/fail2ban(/.*)?` instead of `/run/fail2ban.*` doesn't work? I try to be very careful

Re: The GRUB2 Bootloader – Installation and Configuration

2024-05-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 07:53 +0200, Peter Boy wrote: > > > > Am 04.05.2024 um 05:41 schrieb Sérgio Basto : > > > > Hi, > > About this documentation [0], finally talks about rescue a > > bootloader > > with live images ... (but I will wrote about that in another time) > > That doc is quite old,

Re: Need SELinux help for fail2ban!

2024-05-04 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 4:49 PM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez < carlosrodrifernan...@gmail.com> wrote: > The suggestion for one of the comments of using `/run/fail2ban(/.*)?` > instead of `/run/fail2ban.*` doesn't work? > I try to be very careful with making changes in SELinux and I don't know what

Re: Need SELinux help for fail2ban!

2024-05-04 Thread Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
The suggestion for one of the comments of using `/run/fail2ban(/.*)?` instead of `/run/fail2ban.*` doesn't work? On 5/4/24 13:05, Richard Shaw wrote: I still don't understand SELinux and would appreciate an assist! fail2ban-server is unable to create the socket file

Re: Need SELinux help for fail2ban!

2024-05-04 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/4/24 1:05 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I still don't understand SELinux and would appreciate an assist! fail2ban-server is unable to create the socket file /run/fail2ban/fail2ban.sock There's a lot of custom SELinux policies and I'm unable to figure out what needs to change. I made a PR.

Need SELinux help for fail2ban!

2024-05-04 Thread Richard Shaw
I still don't understand SELinux and would appreciate an assist! fail2ban-server is unable to create the socket file /run/fail2ban/fail2ban.sock There's a lot of custom SELinux policies and I'm unable to figure out what needs to change. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279054

Re: Simpler first tutorial package for Package Maintainer Docs

2024-05-04 Thread Otto Liljalaakso
Kenneth Goldman kirjoitti 3.5.2024 klo 23.07: A review from a complete newbie ... 1. The link points to a pull request. Where is the actual tutorial? At the time you and I originally wrote, nowhere. The docs development workflow is to update the documentation source Git using the usual

Re: Your Fedora requests for aws-checksums, aws-c-compression, aws-lc and s2n-tls

2024-05-04 Thread Benson Muite
On 04/05/2024 02.21, Dominik Wombacher wrote: > > Hi Benson, > >> >> Happy to co-maintain. Feel free to close my requests if you want to >> proceed soon, would not be able to update them till late next week. >> > > thanks a lot, for both. I submitted new requests today: Ok. cc-ing list as open

Re: calendar.fp.o pointing to obsolete IRC for meetings

2024-05-04 Thread Dominik Wombacher
On 5/3/24 8:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So, help would definitely be welcome fixing the matrix/irc issues in the > code, and then we could look at mass updating it. > I briefly looked into it, can be an easy fix. I put a comment into the open issue for matrix support in fedocal:

[Test-Announce] Fedora 41 Rawhide 20240504.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2024-05-04 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 41 Rawhide 20240504.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki