The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-f7310355bb
djvulibre-3.5.28-5.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-a98407e8b0
suricata-6.0.19-1.el8
The following builds have
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 02:15:20PM GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hey folks.
>
> hiredis 1.2.0 has been out a long while now, and with some prodding I am
> finally looking at updating rawhide to it.
>
> A interested user ran a mass prebuild:
>
Adam Williamson wrote:
> The shortest syntax is just to use Patch: foo.patch , and %autosetup .
That is not a syntax to apply a patch, it is an automagic that blindly
applies all patches in numeric order. Cannot reorder patches, cannot apply
them conditionally (e.g., based on the 0%{?fedora}
Dne 10. 05. 24 v 11:47 odp. Gary Buhrmaster napsal(a):
Unless the BZs force a package to be
updated you may very well end up with
~20% of the Fedora packages nearly
forever not being updated with proper
SPDX licenses as they are as likely or
not going to be forever be on re-build
auto-pilot
msuchy opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Exporter-Tidy` that
you are following:
``
Correct SPDX license
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Exporter-Tidy/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240510.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240511.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 25
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 318.57 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:28:07PM +0200, Florian Festi wrote:
> Anyone interested in picking this up? I remember quite a few people
> being exited about this when it was announced with the rpm-4.19 Change.
I would be interested in making this happen.
You mentioned that the transition "requires
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:13:53PM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> My idea is to split systemtap-sdt-devel into two packages: one with all the
> content but without the python script (/usr/bin/dtrace) and a new one
> containing only the mentioned script.
+1
I think it's weird that a user program
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2024-05-13
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org
Greetings testers! It's meeting time again.
Here is a handy
On Sat, 2024-05-11 at 01:04 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Florian Festi wrote:
> > We have an even easier solution for you: You can just run the script at
> > [3] with -n on your own spec files to get them changed to the %patch N
> > variant. If you do that right now they will not break
10 matches
Mail list logo
