> Am 23.05.2024 um 00:29 schrieb Marius Schwarz :
>
> Am 22.05.24 um 17:48 schrieb Alexander Sosedkin:
>> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:34 PM Marius Schwarz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Were you following the steps outlined in
>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline ?
Thanks, report filed on https://github.com/oneapi-src/level-zero/issues/146.
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
We're trying to update vxl but running into some errors:
/usr/bin/ld: ../../../../../../lib/libbbas_pro.so.3.5.0.0: undefined
reference to `brdb_value_t >
>::assign(brdb_value const&)'
/usr/bin/ld: ../../../../../../lib/libbbas_pro.so.3.5.0.0: undefined
reference to `brdb_value_t >
On 5/22/24 18:02, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
Upstream made a change that requires cloning a sub-directory
spdlog-populate leading to a failure to build. What will be an
alternative to address that issue?
Scratch build result on
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-07403ba3a8
chromium-125.0.6422.60-3.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
cacti-1.2.27-1.el7
Hello team,
Upstream made a change that requires cloning a sub-directory
spdlog-populate leading to a failure to build. What will be an
alternative to address that issue?
Scratch build result on
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=118027071
Thanks in advance
References:
On 5/22/24 3:29 PM, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Am 22.05.24 um 17:48 schrieb Alexander Sosedkin:
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:34 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
Were you following the steps outlined in
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline ?
I'm under the impression,
Am 22.05.24 um 17:48 schrieb Alexander Sosedkin:
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:34 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
Were you following the steps outlined in
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline ?
I'm under the impression, there is a small misunderstanding here: The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282792
Bug ID: 2282792
Summary: perl-Devel-CheckOS-2.04 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-CheckOS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel writes:
> On 22/05/2024 01:45, Tom Stellard wrote:
>> I looked in the iwyu source, and it's not using ${LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR}
>> correctly.
>> That variable points to where the libraries are installed, but iwyu is
>> using it to look
>> up the resource directory. iwyu
IIRC, go applications with vendored modules/go-packages, if rpm-packaged
carefully, do provide go-package dependency information via the
rpm-provides tag for vendored packages. I wonder about "imports" of
golang's stdlib go-packages.
Usecase: go.dev releases a new golang version because an
On 22/05/2024 19.13, Attila Kovacs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm an astrophysicist / developer (nowadays more developer than
> astrohysicist). I mostly write code in C and Java (for work and for personal
> stuff). My main job is maintaining and developing software for the
> Smithsonian's Submillimeter
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 09:06:07AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 17/04/2024 09:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > In some ways, that'd be nice, because we wouldn't have to install
> > additional tools in the buildroot. But OTOH, those tools are rather
> > small and
Hi!
I'm an astrophysicist / developer (nowadays more developer than astrohysicist).
I mostly write code in C and Java (for work and for personal stuff). My main
job is maintaining and developing software for the Smithsonian's Submillimeter
Array (SMA) observatory atop Maunakea. Some of the
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:34 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
> ATM I'm upgrading a remote server from F38 to F39 via SSH login.
>
> The bash runs a screen, so if ssh or the network dies, the upgrade can
> continue.
>
> I just noticed that even if it keeps running, it's useless because
> openssl und
https://ausil.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-40-20240417.n.0.iso
is the last ISO built for a nightly compose for F40. It gives you the
prerelease warning but is very close to GA.
Dennis
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 7:40 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2024-05-21 at 20:15
On 22-05-2024 16:32, Vít Ondruch wrote:
The same link works for me and other people are claiming the badge.
That leads me to believe some local cache or the like might be
getting in the way. I don't have access to the logs. That makes my
guesses as good as anyone's.
I have created new
Hi,
ATM I'm upgrading a remote server from F38 to F39 via SSH login.
The bash runs a screen, so if ssh or the network dies, the upgrade can
continue.
I just noticed that even if it keeps running, it's useless because
openssl und openssh do not get upgraded after another.
So, atm, the
Dne 22. 05. 24 v 16:28 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 21. 05. 24 v 16:27 Sandro napsal(a):
On 21-05-2024 16:22, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 5/21/24 10:17 AM, Sandro wrote:
On 21-05-2024 15:47, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 05. 24 v 15:45 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 21. 05. 24 v 15:31 Steven A.
Dne 21. 05. 24 v 16:27 Sandro napsal(a):
On 21-05-2024 16:22, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 5/21/24 10:17 AM, Sandro wrote:
On 21-05-2024 15:47, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 05. 24 v 15:45 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 21. 05. 24 v 15:31 Steven A. Falco napsal(a):
I'm getting the "410 Gone"
On 22-05-2024 12:12, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 23:51, Sandro wrote:
Hi,
I intend to unretire pyftpdlib [1] and rename the base package to
python-pyftpdlib in line with current Python Packaging Guidelines. The
Why unretire? Why not just do a new package given the new
On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 23:51, Sandro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I intend to unretire pyftpdlib [1] and rename the base package to
> python-pyftpdlib in line with current Python Packaging Guidelines. The
Why unretire? Why not just do a new package given the new name?
> package has been retired for more
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240521.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240522.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 107
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.99 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821879
--- Comment #8 from errata-xmlrpc ---
This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Via RHSA-2024:3049 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3049
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821879
errata-xmlrpc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Red Hat Product Errata
Hey Folks!
We will be testing Fedora 41 with the new update in Podman 5.1.
To ensure a smooth transition, the Podman team and the Quality team of
Fedora have decided to host a test day[1]. The idea is for users to
test Podman 5.1 on a Fedora Rawhide machine and submit results in the
Test Day
On 21/05/2024 22:59, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I am a tad sad that this was approved by FESCo without being first
discussed with the wider community.
We have another similar issue: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3205
This was also not discussed. Intel wants to include pre-built blobs to
the
On 21/05/2024 15:30, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
spdlog 1.14.1 will include a soversion bump from .1.12 to .1.14.
Completed and pushed to Rawhide.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
--
___
devel mailing list --
On 17/04/2024 09:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
In some ways, that'd be nice, because we wouldn't have to install
additional tools in the buildroot. But OTOH, those tools are rather
small and bash/find/etc probably need to be installed anyway.
It doesn't seem to work properly without
On 22/05/2024 01:45, Tom Stellard wrote:
I looked in the iwyu source, and it's not using ${LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR}
correctly.
That variable points to where the libraries are installed, but iwyu is
using it to look
up the resource directory. iwyu should be using `clang
-print-resource-dir`
instead.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282294
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
1.9.02 was released 2023-11-04. However, there has to be solved problem with
rpm version.
$ rpmdev-vercmp 1.51.3 1.9.02
1.51.3 > 1.9.02
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282294
Bug ID: 2282294
Summary: Upgrade perl-App-Asciio to 1.9.02
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/App-Asciio
Status: NEW
Component:
32 matches
Mail list logo
