Hi,
Go-SIG has raised a ticket with FESCo [1] to propose a significant
shift in Fedora's packaging approach for Go dependencies: moving to
vendoring/bundling by default. This would represent a major departure
from our current guidelines [2].
Given the potential impact, it was suggested that we br
Hi,
This is a heads-up regarding the impact of Go 1.24, now available in
Fedora, and the subsequent mass-rebuild for Fedora 42. Over 200
packages are currently failing to build from source (FTBFS) [1] due to
a stricter check introduced in Go 1.24 [2].
The failure occurs due to a stricter vet chec
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250119.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250120.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 32
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.85 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Sun, 2025-01-19 at 17:19 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I see several of my packages are FTB in the running mass rebuild due
> to
> something like:
>
> error: too many arguments to function ‘DoInterlace’; expected 0, have
> 1
>
> Is that due to GCC 15, or is due to some "hardening" se
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 05:28:04PM +, Fedora-Devel Mailing List wrote:
> Il 19/01/25 18:23, Michael J Gruber ha scritto:
> > Mattia Verga via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-19 18:19:24:
> >> I see several of my packages are FTB in the running mass rebuild due to
> >> something like:
> >>
> >
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 07:47:31PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> Oh, I was under the impression that the mass rebuild retries the failed
> builds in a loop. I had a different mental model of what happens. But since
> the builds are independent, then this does make sense to just try
> indi-3rdparty-drivers:
> error: expected ‘;’, identifier or ‘(’ before ‘bool’
> Looks like the syntax 'typedef enum { FALSE, TRUE } bool;' is no more
> accepted, but searching in the net it was perfectly fine.
Looking at the build logs, it seems that while a standard is explicitly
provided for
Il 19/01/25 19:02, Cristian Le via devel ha scritto:
> On 2025/01/19 18:32, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
>> Mattia Verga venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-19 18:28:04:
>>
>>> For example:
>>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7044/127997044/build.log
>>> I don't know much of C, from what I've
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 09:10:52AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 03:36:32PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 10:04:28AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > The only way that works, is what mockchain does: build the packages in
> > > > random
On 2025/01/19 18:32, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Mattia Verga venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-19 18:28:04:
For example:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7044/127997044/build.log
I don't know much of C, from what I've read online those functions are
declared without arguments and then us
Mattia Verga venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-19 18:28:04:
> Il 19/01/25 18:23, Michael J Gruber ha scritto:
> > Mattia Verga via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-19 18:19:24:
> >> I see several of my packages are FTB in the running mass rebuild due to
> >> something like:
> >>
> >> error: too many arg
Il 19/01/25 18:24, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 6:19 PM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>> I see several of my packages are FTB in the running mass rebuild due to
>> something like:
>>
>> error: too many arguments to function ‘DoInterlace’; expected 0, have 1
>>
>> Is that
Il 19/01/25 18:23, Michael J Gruber ha scritto:
> Mattia Verga via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-19 18:19:24:
>> I see several of my packages are FTB in the running mass rebuild due to
>> something like:
>>
>> error: too many arguments to function ‘DoInterlace’; expected 0, have 1
>>
>> Is that
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 6:19 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> I see several of my packages are FTB in the running mass rebuild due to
> something like:
>
> error: too many arguments to function ‘DoInterlace’; expected 0, have 1
>
> Is that due to GCC 15, or is due to some "hardening" setting a
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 6:07 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 3:28 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried building mame against sdl2-compat which has replaced SDL2 in
> > rawhide. After some fixes I managed to get further but the build still
> > fails:
> >
> > Co
Mattia Verga via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2025-01-19 18:19:24:
> I see several of my packages are FTB in the running mass rebuild due to
> something like:
>
> error: too many arguments to function ‘DoInterlace’; expected 0, have 1
>
> Is that due to GCC 15, or is due to some "hardening" setting
I see several of my packages are FTB in the running mass rebuild due to
something like:
error: too many arguments to function ‘DoInterlace’; expected 0, have 1
Is that due to GCC 15, or is due to some "hardening" setting applied to
Fedora flags? Should I start filing bugs upstream?
Mattia
--
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 03:36:32PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 10:04:28AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > The only way that works, is what mockchain does: build the packages in
> > > random order. if any fails, repeat while at least one package in the loop
>
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 03:37:09PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 10:44 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > So if you see packages that *change* (either their dependencies, or
> > their contents - but ignoring codegen differences with new compiler
> > versions etc.) between t
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 4:37 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 10:44 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > So if you see packages that *change* (either their dependencies, or
> > their contents - but ignoring codegen differences with new compiler
> > versions etc.) between the last
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 03:18:10PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Some were indeed caused by dependency problems, but it is a special
> case of the case you describe above: because of the sbin merge and
> the sysusers change, some packages are not installable. But such an
> issue is no
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 10:44 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> So if you see packages that *change* (either their dependencies, or
> their contents - but ignoring codegen differences with new compiler
> versions etc.) between the last build before the mass rebuild and the
> build performed during the
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 10:04:28AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The only way that works, is what mockchain does: build the packages in
> > random order. if any fails, repeat while at least one package in the loop
> > succeed.
>
> So, this is an interesting idea. Perhaps we should start doing this
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 11:43:39AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> So if you see packages that *change* (either their dependencies, or
> their contents - but ignoring codegen differences with new compiler
> versions etc.) between the last build before the mass rebuild and the
> build performed duri
I'm going to orphan reg(-server) package.
A few years ago I adopted it because it was used in Fedora
infrastructure to generate the web pages on registry.fedoraproject.org.
We stopped to update those pages long ago (last update in 2023) and
recently we removed all the calls to reg-server in ans
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 3:28 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried building mame against sdl2-compat which has replaced SDL2 in
> rawhide. After some fixes I managed to get further but the build still
> fails:
>
> Compiling src/osd/sdl/window.cpp...
> g++-MMD -MP -MP -DPTR64=1 -DNDE
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 07:16:57PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Benson Muite wrote on 2025/01/19 19:04:
> > Hi Loren,
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2025, at 12:50 PM, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> > > I just noticed that jed was on the FTBFS list and was failing to build
> > > on Fedora and due to be removed.
Benson Muite wrote on 2025/01/19 19:04:
Hi Loren,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025, at 12:50 PM, Loren M. Lang wrote:
I just noticed that jed was on the FTBFS list and was failing to build
on Fedora and due to be removed. I've created a fix that should resolve
the issue and put together a Pull Request for
On Sat, Jan 18, 2025, at 5:56 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 2:40 PM Kyle Bloom wrote:
>>
>> Hello Fabio (or whom it may concern),
>>
>> I am interested in maintaining the python-magic-wormhole package,
>> and it is along with its dependencies. I continue to use and love
>> t
Hi Loren,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025, at 12:50 PM, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> I just noticed that jed was on the FTBFS list and was failing to build
> on Fedora and due to be removed. I've created a fix that should resolve
> the issue and put together a Pull Request for review here:
>
> https://src.fedorapr
I just noticed that jed was on the FTBFS list and was failing to build
on Fedora and due to be removed. I've created a fix that should resolve
the issue and put together a Pull Request for review here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jed/pull-request/1
I am not yet in the packagers group so I
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250118.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250119.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.70 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello,
I tried building mame against sdl2-compat which has replaced SDL2 in
rawhide. After some fixes I managed to get further but the build still
fails:
Compiling src/osd/sdl/window.cpp...
g++-MMD -MP -MP -DPTR64=1 -DNDEBUG -DCRLF=2 -DLSB_FIRST -DXMD_H
-DFLAC__NO_DLL -DNATIVE_DRC=drcbe_
33 matches
Mail list logo
