On July 9, 2025 6:18:25 AM GMT+02:00, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>
>It seems like luxcore has a hard dependencies with luxcoredeps hence the
>following failure:
>
>'''
>
>LuxCore Dependencies - Required version: 1.0.0
>-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
>CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:65
On 2025-07-07 23:16, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
On July 8, 2025 6:16:21 AM GMT+02:00, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
Hello team,
Upstream luxcore made a change to their 2.10 version release requiring a new
luxcoredeps dependencies via conan build manager. Can someone help to
effectively build
Mateus Rodrigues Costa wrote:
> Important: Secure Boot certificates used by most Windows devices are
> set to expire starting in June 2026.
Ouch! Yet another epic Microsoft FAIL. Setting an expiry date (ANY expiring
date) on this sort of signing key, which gets embedded into all sorts of
firmwar
Peter Robinson wrote:
> This and other details have been outlined in updates to devel-announce:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/CKIQPKWLISZNJZWWFFWVDENBUGHJW6R7/
>
> If you're not on devel-announce it's likely worthwhile and a mode
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Why should they? Anubis is a scourge that wastes massive energy for all
> legitimate browsers, breaks search engines, and if configured in a
> particularly aggressive way as on the GNOME GitLab, even entirely locks
> out some browsers (though that is an issue with th
Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> I just want to point out that this is completely false, Anubis does not
> break search engines they are allowlisted to go through without a
> challenge. Only the useragents with "Mozilla" in them are being "checked".
Is that not configuration-dependent? Checking only use
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 8:45 PM Mateus Rodrigues Costa
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> As you guys know Secure Boot is supported by Fedora Linux and it
> relies on the Microsoft signing keys.
> Well, recently I was looking at this month's Windows 11 cumulative
> update and noticed this warning:
>
> Impor
Hello all,
As you guys know Secure Boot is supported by Fedora Linux and it
relies on the Microsoft signing keys.
Well, recently I was looking at this month's Windows 11 cumulative
update and noticed this warning:
Important: Secure Boot certificates used by most Windows devices are
set to expire
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-07-08/fesco.2025-07-08-17.11.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-07-08/fesco.2025-07-08-17.11.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_m
Hi -
I wrote:
> I see what you mean. I've tried to gather this data about llvm on my
> workstation, but recent rpmbuild's keep barfing with: [...]
Uninstalling lua-devel and glibc-devel.i686 resulted in complete &
comparable llvm 20.1.7 x86-64 builds. Added some representative
statistics to t
On 7/8/25 10:03, Peter Robinson wrote:
1. when I try to pull updates from pkgs.fedoraproject.org, I get an
error that host key has changed:
This and other details have been outlined in updates to devel-announce:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.o
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2025-07-08 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Refreshing my ssh config with the one from
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/sysadmin_guide/sshaccess/#_ssh_configuration
helped me with batcave access which had the same SSHFP error before.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 10:31 AM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> Peter Robinson venit, vidit, dixit 202
Peter Robinson venit, vidit, dixit 2025-07-08 10:03:20:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 08:22, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > thank you for all the work you did/are doing atm with datacenter move!
> > I'm looking forward to faster infrastructure for my builds and tests :) .
> >
> > Unfortuna
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 08:22, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> thank you for all the work you did/are doing atm with datacenter move!
> I'm looking forward to faster infrastructure for my builds and tests :) .
>
> Unfortunately (as with every big change) discrepancies are appearing and
> althou
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250707.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250708.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 109
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.92 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Zdenek Dohnal venit, vidit, dixit 2025-07-08 09:22:06:
> Hi all,
>
> thank you for all the work you did/are doing atm with datacenter move!
> I'm looking forward to faster infrastructure for my builds and tests :) .
>
> Unfortunately (as with every big change) discrepancies are appearing and
>
Hi all,
thank you for all the work you did/are doing atm with datacenter move!
I'm looking forward to faster infrastructure for my builds and tests :) .
Unfortunately (as with every big change) discrepancies are appearing and
although I've tried to check emails here and the blog post on the
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250708.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
19 matches
Mail list logo
