TBB 2022.2.0 rebuilds next week

2025-08-13 Thread Jerry James
Hello all, On August 20, at approximately 18:00 UTC, I would like to start the builds for the TBB 2022.2.0 change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/TBB2022.2.0. Builds for F43 and Rawhide will be done in side tags. Given how long some of the packages take to build, I anticipate needing 2-3

Golang 1.25 mini mass rebuild

2025-08-13 Thread Maxwell G via devel-announce
Hi everyone, Within the next couple days, I plan to rebuild all Go packages that include compiled binaries [1,2] on rawhide and f43 against Go 1.25.0 GA. This amounts to ~475 packages. The rebuild commits will be committed to rawhide and then fast-forward merged to f43. The package updates wil

Fedora eln compose report: 20250814.n.0 changes

2025-08-13 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250813.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250814.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:41 Upgraded packages: 52 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:101.58 MiB Size

Re: No emails for package updates

2025-08-13 Thread Michal Schorm
I found this conversation [1] from last year, in which Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > Yes, you can get them. You have to set up the appropriate notifications at: > https://notifications.fedoraproject.org/ > The old notification system was retired about a year ago (I think?), > and one needed to create n

Re: No emails for package updates

2025-08-13 Thread Michal Schorm
You should be able to set up theme here again: https://notifications.fedoraproject.org/ And if I recall correctly, they were globally disabled for everyone some time ago (a year? or two?), as a part of general cleanup of the infra that sends them. I might be wrong about the story behind it though.

No emails for package updates

2025-08-13 Thread Chris Adams
I did not get any emails about the packages I maintain from the mass rebuild. I used to get those, but at some point they stopped. I remember asking about this after a previous mass rebuild, getting some pointers, and changing some settings... but still nothing (and now I can't remember where to

Re: Transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed. - file /usr/share/thumbnailers/gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer.thumbnailer conflicts between attempted installs of gdk-pixbuf2-2.43.3-4.fc43.i686 and gdk-pixbuf2

2025-08-13 Thread Ryan Bach via devel
Just added it here now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388374 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject

Re: Transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed. - file /usr/share/thumbnailers/gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer.thumbnailer conflicts between attempted installs of gdk-pixbuf2-2.43.3-4.fc43.i686 and gdk-pixbuf2

2025-08-13 Thread Ryan Bach via devel
> Mateus Rodrigues Costa Could you show me where I could contact him get the pack serperated? Thanks. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed. - file /usr/share/thumbnailers/gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer.thumbnailer conflicts between attempted installs of gdk-pixbuf2-2.43.3-4.fc43.i686 and gdk-pixbuf2

2025-08-13 Thread Ryan Bach via devel
Mateus Rodrigues Costa wrote: > Em qua., 6 de ago. de 2025, 17:55, Ryan Bach via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> escreveu: > > Transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed. > > > > file /usr/share/thumbnailers/gdk-pixbuf-thumbnailer.thumbnailer > > > > conflicts between attempted installs

Fedora 43 compose report: 20250813.n.1 changes

2025-08-13 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-43-20250812.n.1 NEW: Fedora-43-20250813.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 49 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2025-08-13 Thread Dennis Gilmore via devel
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:31 PM Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > On 11/01/2017 03:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > The only attack vector I can see is tricking someone into installing a > > package from an EOL release with a known vulnerablity, but if you can do > > that you likely can get them to just do

Re: Ceph, Apache Arrow (libarrow), Apache ORC (liborc) version and SONAME bump in rawhide

2025-08-13 Thread Orion Poplawski
I have kicked off rebuilds of gdal, groonga, and root after running: koji wait-repo f44-build-side-116633 --build=libarrow-21.0.0-1.fc44 --request https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=136012882 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=136012897 https://koji.fedoraproj

Inactive Provenpackagers for the F43 cycle

2025-08-13 Thread Mattia Verga via devel-announce
In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the provenpackager group. Note that

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2025-08-12)

2025-08-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:50:57AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 13. 08. 25 v 10:11 Fabio Alessandro Locati via devel napsal(a): > > Text Log: > > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-08-12/fesco.2025-08-12-17.00.log.txt > > > > HTML Log: > > https://meetb

Fedora 43 has been Branched

2025-08-13 Thread Samyak Jain via devel-announce
Hi All, Fedora Linux 43 has now been branched (yesterday, August 12). Please be sure to do a git fetch -v to pick up the new branch. As an additional reminder, Rawhide and Fedora Linux 43 have been completely isolated from previous releases, which means that anything you do for f43, you also have

Re: Ceph, Apache Arrow (libarrow), Apache ORC (liborc) version and SONAME bump in rawhide

2025-08-13 Thread Kaleb Keithley
liborc and libarrow packages are now built in the side tag and dependent package builds can be started. Thanks On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 4:39 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 8/12/25 13:34, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > Now that f43 has branched I will be updating: > > ceph to ceph 20 (tentacle)

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2025-08-13 Thread yselkowitz
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2025-08-14 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 US/Eastern At meet...@fedoraproject.org The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/11091/ -- ___ devel mailin

Upcoming retirement of gtk3-rs, gtk-rs-core v0.18, and gtk4-rs v0.7

2025-08-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi all, I am planning to implement this Fedora 43 Change in one week (on Aug 20, 2025): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Retire_gtk3-rs,_gtk-rs-core_v0.18,_and_gtk4-rs_v0.7 The packages in the Change document will be retired in both rawhide and f43 branches. Not all affected applications h

Re: FTBFS for ncmpcpp in Rawhide - need support

2025-08-13 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Dan Horák wrote on 2025/08/13 19:29: On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 12:14:16 +0200 Dominic Hopf via devel wrote: Greetings, I'm currently trying to take care of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385207 but get stuck in understanding what happened here as the package itself got its last update

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250813.n.1 changes

2025-08-13 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250813.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250813.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 16 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Nodejs node_modules path (self contained)

2025-08-13 Thread Tomas Juhasz
Hello, since testing the change with mass-prebuild didn't reveal any blockers, we will be moving on with the implementation by merging the change to rawhide. You can expect the update soon. Best Regards, T.Juhasz On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 3:33 PM Aoife Moloney via devel-announce < devel-annou...@li

Re: FTBFS for ncmpcpp in Rawhide - need support

2025-08-13 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 12:14:16 +0200 Dominic Hopf via devel wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm currently trying to take care of > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385207 but get stuck in > understanding what happened here as the package itself got its last update > on 2024-10-28. Since then t

FTBFS for ncmpcpp in Rawhide - need support

2025-08-13 Thread Dominic Hopf via devel
Greetings, I'm currently trying to take care of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385207 but get stuck in understanding what happened here as the package itself got its last update on 2024-10-28. Since then there only were (Mass)? Rebuilds for the package. Basic error message is, that

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2025-08-12)

2025-08-13 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 13. 08. 25 v 10:11 Fabio Alessandro Locati via devel napsal(a): Text Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-08-12/fesco.2025-08-12-17.00.log.txt HTML Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-08-12/fesco.2025-08-12-1

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2025-08-12)

2025-08-13 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati via devel
Text Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-08-12/fesco.2025-08-12-17.00.log.txt HTML Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-08-12/fesco.2025-08-12-17.00.log.html Text Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250813.n.0 changes

2025-08-13 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250812.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250813.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 20 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

fedora:rawhide --arch s390x container: bash missing prompt

2025-08-13 Thread Marián Konček
When I run `podman run --arch s390x --rm -it fedora:rawhide` as well as `mock -r fedora-rawhide-s390x --shell`, the shell prompt is missing but the shell is still working. On F41 shell looks correct. This seems like a bug somewhere in the container. -- Marián Konček -- __