Fedora eln compose report: 20250902.n.0 changes

2025-09-01 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250902.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 11 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 19 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 15.40 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

2025-09-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:12 AM Jonathan Steffan wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 8:36 AM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> It is possible to request Fedora to sign it. You will probably need to make >> some packaging changes to support it, but it can be done. > > > Ah cool. I didn't know that we had mad

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

2025-09-01 Thread Jonathan Steffan
Hello, memtest86+ is already at the latest version. We automatically monitor upstream and have been responsive for updates. If you have any issues with the package please file a bug. :) We are unable to sign these builds due to the requirements for the secure boot signing process. If there is eve

Re: Invalid maintainers for freeipa and retrace-server packages

2025-09-01 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 03:07:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 07:11:22AM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 10:27 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I don't use Gmail, but I've heard about this problem before, so it'd be >

Re: Retiring monodevelop

2025-09-01 Thread Timotheus Pokorra
Hello Miro, You should probably also retire monodevelop-debugger-gdb See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2392360 Thank your for the hint! I have now also retired monodevelop-debugger-gdb from Rawhide and Fedora 43. All the best, Timotheus -- ___ deve

Re: replace memtest86+ with pcmemtest, needs maintainer

2025-09-01 Thread Kamil Paral
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 6:19 PM Roke Beedell via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > From what I see, no replacement was ever added to the boot options, so > none exists now (although it is performed by the kernel at boot). > Considering that > https://unix.stackexchange.com/revisions/

Re: Help on Fedora EPEL 10 build failure

2025-09-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 08:53:17PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Hi there > > This takes possible RHEL/EPEL friction to a new level. We're used to > packages which are built for RHEL but shipped partially only (libs > without devel). "Moving" a package from EPEL to RHEL, i.e. shipping it > in R

Re: Retiring monodevelop

2025-09-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 08. 25 17:09, Timotheus Pokorra wrote: Hello list, Please let me know if there is a reason not to retire the package. There has not been a reply. The package monodevelop is now retired in rawhide and in Fedora 43. You should probably also retire monodevelop-debugger-gdb See https://

Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20250814.0 coming to F44/Rawhide and F43

2025-09-01 Thread Ben Beasley
In one week, 2025-09-08, or slightly later, I plan to update abseil-cpp from 20250512.1 to 20250814.0 (Abseil LTS branch, August 2025)[1] in a side tag for F44/Rawhide. I plan to do the same update for F43/Branched as well, but I intend to wait until the Beta Freeze is over in order to minimize

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250901.n.0 changes

2025-09-01 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250831.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250901.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 42 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 35.12 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B