On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 10:24 +0200, Alexandre Moine wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
>
> I want to become a co-maintener of freemedforms and freediams with
> Ankur
> Sinha, under the SIG medical. I'm not a sponsored fedora packager, so
> I
> need a sponsor. I know a little bit how
On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 00:33 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
> release having a short-minded name with special chars
> not properly handeled by the whole OS?
I know you're upset Harald, but I would request you to please refrain
from terms such as
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 19:29 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed the mass rebuild on Aug 3 botched up my EVR for
> libreswan:
>
> Release: %{?prever:0.}1%{?prever:.%{prever}}%{?dist}.1
>
> It should have been:
>
> Release: %{?prever:0.}2%{?prever:.%{prever}}%{?dist}
>
> The prev
Hi,
One of my packages: dcm4che-test fails to build for rawhide currently.
There's a bug filed here[1]. The build.log seems to fail on the
"add_to_maven_depmap" macro. I think it doesn't find it at all[2]. Could
someone please tell me if I'm missing a BR or if the macros have
changed[3]?
[1] http
Hi,
I maintain two packages for the fedora-medical SIG that fall under the
"freemedforms[1]" project. At the moment, these are packaged separately:
1. freemedforms[2]: provides freemedforms-emr and pulls in freediams
2. freediams[3]
Now, freemedforms-emr and freediams are both built from the sa
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 10:03 +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Lukas,
>
> when the site was launched, I used my generic OpenID account, but now
> I
> would like to merge also my Fedora OpenID to it.
>
> I tried to login using FAS and it just created a new one. Searching
> around did not re
Hi,
I just noticed that taskjuggler doesn't work at all in Fedora 19. I
filed a bug here[1]. It's interesting that the rawhide build FTBFS for
exactly the same reason[2]. I wonder why the F19 build didn't fail and
catch the error? Is there a difference in the tests that F19 and rawhide
are running
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 00:40 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Looking at Koji from Russian Fedora, I noticed some plugins for Gimp
> missing in the current Fedora repository.
> I am interested to port them which bring some questions, do I keep
> the
> original changelog and notify ported from Rus
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 09:12 +0200, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Hi Ankur,
> I'll take it!
Thanks Mario!
Labyrinth has been re-added to the repositories. I'll push builds soon.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http:
Hi,
I would like to re-add labyrinth to Fedora. It was deprecated due to
multiple FTBFS bugs, but seems to build just right with the new upstream
release.
I'd be happy to swap reviews with someone to get this package re-review
expedited :)
The rhbz is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 12:18 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> I think I'll go for 973868 lifeographer. Admittedly, this is the easy
> path, but to be honest I'm very new to fonts and feel like a little
> more experience would help before reviewing font packages...
I thought the font would be easier, but
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 10:29 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> - 956134 mnmlicons-fonts
I can take this one.
Would you take either anka-coder fonts[1] or lifeographer[2] in return
for this one Alec?
Both are *simple* reviews :)
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954
[2] https://bugzi
Hi,
I'd like to resurrect the lifeograph[1,2] package that was deprecated a
few releases ago because it didn't have a maintainer[3]. As per the wiki
instructions[4], I've opened a review ticket here[5]. It should be a
simple review. Could someone please swap reviews with me so I could get
this pac
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 14:34 +0800, Danishka Navin wrote:
> I am still willing to contribute but waiting for sponsorship. :)
Hi Danishka,
Unfortunately, there isn't an upper limit to the time that one takes to
get sponsored.
Can you please post what informal reviews you've done? A sponsor on thi
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 19:59 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> FOUR DAYS is "no longer active" for you? Seriously?
> You want to STFU those who disagree _this hard_?
Pete,
There is no constructive discussion going on here any more. 4 days is
certainly enough time for a mailing list thread to go inacti
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 07:36 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Hi folks,
> In this case is not my will express my complains about why removable
> devices are mounted on /run/media but I'd want to know how
> udisks/udev/systemd/whoever chooses where it will mount the device,
> and even took a look to log
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 16:30 -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Ravindra,
>
> After my changes today, the latest SRPM should be
> "open-vm-tools-9.2.3-3.fc20.src.rpm" instead of
> open-vm-tools-9.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm.
> Could someone please tell me how do I get this page
> http://dl.fedoraprojec
Hi!
Here are the package review statistics for the past week, from
2013-04-16 to today, 2013-04-23. Anderson did the most reviews this
week. In total, there were 64 reviews this week.
Start Date: 2013-04-16 00:00:00
End Date: 2013-04-23 14:18:24.572433
Anderson Silva : 14
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911042nodejs-node-uuid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922481nodejs-JSV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922488nodejs-node-markdown
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) : 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871197c
On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 16:14 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I'll file a ticket with the infra team.
Ticket filed:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3748
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
Please only print if necessary.
Looking to contribute to
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 17:20 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Yeah. Part of the reason I suggested this to you long back was that
> it keeps the idea of reviews as part of the conversation for this list
> but also because it was a nod of recognition for the reviewers who
> were often doing grunt work
Hi folks,
I've been having trouble running builds for rawhide on my mock instance
recently:
> [ankur@dhcppc1 SRPMS]$ mock rebuild -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64
> pybrain-0.3.1-1.fc18.src.rpm
> INFO: mock.py version 1.1.29 starting...
> Start: init plugins
> INFO: selinux enabled
> Finish: init plug
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 07:04 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I'm getting unreliable suspend. This seems to be the problem:
>
> Mar 14 05:39:58 nbecker1 kernel: [140688.356449] nouveau [ DRM]
> suspending
> fbcon...
> Mar 14 05:39:58 nbecker1 kernel: [140688.356459] nouveau [ DRM]
> suspen
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 22:21 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I'm going to start with
> roundcubemail and try to package wikindx4 in a similar manner
I've looked at a few web apps and made quite a few changes to the spec.
However, there are still a few issues that would require heav
Hi folks,
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 17:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> No-one's answered the simplest part of the question yet :)
>
> You can make httpd 'use the files in /usr/share' simply by including
> a
> config snippet in /etc/httpd/conf.d/ . As Kevin suggests, Wordpress is
> a
> decent exa
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 23:22 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> You should take a look at mediawiki[1]. It stores its files in
> /usr/share/mediawiki and provides scripts for creating new wikis. The
> scripts reference a list of wikis in /etc/mediawiki. Instead of
> copies
> the new wikis are sy
Hi folks,
I've recently packaged and submitted wikindx[1] for review[2]. I have a
few queries with the rpm, since it's a web package and not really up my
alley:
I've placed all the files in %{_datadir} as the guidelines specify[3]
(and forbid the placement of files into /var/www). Now, how is a u
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 23:11 +0530, Mayur Patil wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Mayur,
Please get in touch with Buddhike who is heading the fedora gsoc team
this time.
More information on Fedora GSoC 2013 can be found here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013
There's a mailing list specifically for the
Hi Ralph,
I've taken this one and will review it before EOD.
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 11:13 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688
Could you please review either
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912048 - "mpDris2"
or
https://bugzilla.redh
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 23:23 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> yes, there was an incomplete patch added unintentionally to the
> script.
> All faulty bugs should be closed and new bugs created if appropriate.
>
> Sorry for the trouble.
No worries. Thank you for the quick fix :)
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Hi folks,
I've received new bugs in the form:
"bibus-1...5...2 is available". There's already a bug for 1.5.2. Is
something faulty with the script?
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
Please only print if necessary.
Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here:
https://fedoraproject.
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 23:38 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Miroslav is asking us to try -60 now.
Seems to have fixed the issue :)
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
Please only print if necessary.
Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Jo
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 12:53 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> In bohdi, people have reported that -59 fixed the problem going
> forward. But
> people already affected need to relabel.
Looks like I got caught with this one. However, the updated and a
relabel isn't working for me. My USB attached HDD
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 21:52 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 13:08:13 +1100,
> Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >I recently packaged octave-odepkg[1] reviewed and approved for fedora.
> >I've been able to build it for both f18 and
Hi folks,
I recently packaged octave-odepkg[1] reviewed and approved for fedora.
I've been able to build it for both f18 and f17, but the rawhide builds
keep failing because of what looks like a broken dep chain:
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result
ERROR: Comm
Hi folks!
The ballots for the Fedora 19 elections are now open. This time, we have
the following seats to decide on[1]:
* Fedora Project Board (two seats)[2]
* FESCo (Engineering) (four seats)[3]
* FAmSCo (Ambassadors) (three seats)[4]
To aid you in your decision, the questionnaires with the can
Hi folks,
The logs from the FESCo townhall are below. Please do take time out to
go through them if you missed the townhall:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-townhall/2012-11-27/fesco-townhall.2012-11-27-16.59.html
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-townhall/2012-11-27/fesco-townhal
Hi folks,
A gentle reminder that the FESCo town hall session for the F19 elections
is at 1700UTC on November 27[1][2]. It's a good chance to question the
candidates[3] before you cast your votes at the ballot.
I hope to see you there.
More information on the elections can be found here[3].
PS:
Hi folks,
Another gentle reminder. There are about 10 more hours to go. Please
complete your nominations ASAP!
I apologise for the spam, but we'd like to have enough candidates to
make it a fruitful election. :)
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 10:16 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Attention all f
Attention all fedorians!
This is an urgent but gentle reminder that the nomination period for the
elections ends today (November 13 at 2359 UTC). Please update the wiki
page with your nominations before the nominations period ends later
today if you'd like to be considered and voted for! All the b
Hi folks,
Would any one want to swap reviews with me? I'd like to get this one
reviewed:
xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file
format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
I'll be happy to review a package in return.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "F
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:46 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a number of outstanding reviews that are available for swap.
> All
> are fairly trivial so shouldn't take too much time:
Hey Brendan,
>
> ams - ALSA Modular Synth - a port from the CCRMA repo
> https://bugzilla.redhat.
Hi folks,
Seems I cannot use koji (therefore fedpkg build and related commands) on
my university wifi. It gives me an error:
> [ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ ps aux | egrep ssh
> root 999 0.0 0.0 77608 1288 ?Ss Oct18 0:00
> /usr/sbin/sshd -D
> ankur 4714 0.0 0.0 106996 848
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 23:11 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> Thanks for all the suggestions, I took the X11 config option which *just
> works*
>
> I honestly think this should be the default.
>
> At least, if there is a setting it should be system wide rather than
> personal / effective only after
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 23:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So instead of /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf you should
> create /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf . Other than that, I
> think
> the advice is good.
Hi,
Thanks Adam, Onuralp, Alvaro.
I've created a page here[1]. P
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop
> defaults, AFAIK.
I thought so too. I was wondering what the DE agnostic way of enabling
tapping would be though. I use gnome, and the "mouse" utility does this
for me
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 18:00 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> Here is the all the activities I have packaged
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841239
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842101
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842107
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 17:58 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Would anyone want to swap reviews? I need "octave-nnet[1]" reviewed.
>
> (It's my first octave package, so a reviewer with some octave
> packaging
> experience would be preferred ;))
Hi folks,
Would anyone want to swap reviews? I need "octave-nnet[1]" reviewed.
(It's my first octave package, so a reviewer with some octave packaging
experience would be preferred ;))
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847952
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
Please
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:47 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I think it is worth considering adding the proposed fix to the Fedora
> 3.4 kernels for now, as it seems a lot of people are bitten by this,
> and the proposed fix is pretty save.
Fedora Kernel maintainers: Please can we have this patch in
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:47 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> This is a known issue in the 3.4 kernel, a fix is being worked on
> upstream,
> see:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/65976
>
> I think it is worth considering adding the proposed fix to the Fedora
> 3.4 kernels for n
Hi folks,
In kernels 3.4 and 3.4.2, the kernel gets the size of my pen drives
wrong: it thinks they're EB[1] in size, when they're actually only 4GB
and 8GB. This issue is not present in the 3.3 kernel.
I was wondering if any one else is facing the same issue? The bug is
filed here[2].
As a res
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 17:54 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Steps:
> 1. File ticket at infra to set up fedora-join mailing list
> 2. Set up IRC channel #fedora-join
> 3. File ticket with websites SIG to make tiny changes to join.fp.o
> to list Fedora-Join IRC and mailin
Hello folks!
First, please forgive me for the X-post. The email concerns more than
one team and I really didn't know what mailing list to send it to. I've
therefore sent it to the 3 major lists that I hope would cover most of
the community.
We've been recently looking to reduce the lea
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 09:15 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On-the-fly downloading of source archives and patches won't be
> acceptable,
> since these files must be included in the src.rpm (with the packagers
> being
> in the position to control what will be used/packaged).
>
> It would be necess
Hey folks,
I was wondering if anyone's ever considered packaging pyroscope[1] for
Fedora? It adds quite a lot of functionality to rtorrent.
I've just started looking into it, and the building looks pretty messy.
This is the build script they use[2]. It downloads everything, including
rtorrent, a
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 12:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> ankursinha aeskulap
Rebuilt for rawhide and f17.
--
Thanks :-),
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Hello folks!
Well, the title says it all. Fedora Tour[1], which we recently decided
to make a web application needs web developers. Ironic eh? The thing is:
none of the current Fedora Tour team members have ever done web
development before. We’re learning, but the changes with HTML5, CSS3 and
Java
Hello,
I have two queries that I'd like clarified please:
1. Is the setup.py file to be included in the rpm? I was under the
impression that this file is only required for building that package and
therefore should not be part of the rpm. Is this correct?
2. Are python eggs to be generated for *
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 16:44 -0400, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> Pkgdb link:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/bibus
>
> I kept myself on as a co-maintainer, but it deserves a more
> proactive main owner.
Hi Alex,
I've taken ownership: Thank you for maintaining it so far :)
--
Tha
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 11:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> That's what the akmods are for...
Maybe, but the akmods are not usable in all cases. For instance, you
don't want akmods on servers, specially since it pulls in GCC. The
akmods do fail once in a while, when the changes between kernels
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 12:12 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>
> The yum mailing lists are down?
>
> seem up to me
>
> http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
>
> -sv
Ah! I'll head there. I tried both the devel and users lists yesterday
and got "site not responding" for them. (I had even come d
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 14:51 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to write a yum plug-in: wait-for-kmod
>
> For quite a few users, the kmods from RPMFusion are a must. Take
> broadcom wireless for example. Now, the kmods generally lag the kernel
> updates
Hello,
I'm trying to write a yum plug-in: wait-for-kmod
For quite a few users, the kmods from RPMFusion are a must. Take
broadcom wireless for example. Now, the kmods generally lag the kernel
updates by a few hours: people who do update their systems in this
interval are left without wireless/dis
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:10 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Could someone help me , to understand what happens ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
Wiki page alert ;)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankurs
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 00:35 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > The package is required for Fedora videos[1] :)
> >
> > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Video
>
> How does a keylogger help you upload videos to the Internet Archive?
>
>
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 08:18 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 03/04/2012 06:04 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > A package that we'd like to use for fedora videos requires review:
>
> I'm curious what you mean by 'fedora videos rev
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:12 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> I'll take it if you can pick up
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784605
>
> thanks
>
> Brendan
Hey Brendan,
It's already assigned to someone. Got another one I could take? :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:12 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
> I'll take it if you can pick up
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784605
>
> thanks
>
> Brendan
Sure! Taken! :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoincfedora.wo
Hey folks,
A package that we'd like to use for fedora videos requires review:
Review Request: logkeys - Linux keylogger [1]
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799701
I'll be happy to review a package in return.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The list of orphaned packages is here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt
>
I've taken over tetex-IEEEtrans and Jigdo.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproje
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 09:28 +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> hello,
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > Would any one want to swap reviews please? This is a rather simple
> > package to review :)
> >
> > Revi
On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 19:57 +0100, Christian Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to offer a review swap:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765625
> python-pymodbus - A Modbus Protocol Stack in Python
>
> It is a simple python package, so it should be quite an easy
> review. ;-)
>
> T
hello,
Would any one want to swap reviews please? This is a rather simple
package to review :)
Review Request: indimpc - A minimalist MPD client with support for the
gnome-shell and multimedia keys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765802
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
htt
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 12:32 +0545, Dipesh Acharya wrote:
> view again?
>
> Thank you :)
>
> Dipesh Acharya http://motorscript.com
> http://twitter.com/xtranophilist
>
Ah! No. Not required :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoin
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 01:58 +0545, Dipesh Acharya wrote:
>
> Hello, this is Dipesh Acharya.
>
> I will be packaging and updating gnome-shell-extension-cpu-
> temperature since I develop it.
>
> Thank you :)
> Dipesh Acharya http://motorscript.com
> http://twitter.com/xtranophilist
>
hey Dipe
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 15:46 -0400, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> > My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages
> > around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they
> > can't even install the package.
> >
> > Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm,
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 20:27 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 10.10.11 22:33, Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
Hi Lennart,
>
> Hope this helps,
It certainly does :) I shall make the changes you pointed out.
>
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: &qu
Hi folks,
I've written these service files for deluge. Could someone please review
them and tell me what corrections I need to do here?
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluged.service
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluge-webui.service
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "Francisc
Hello all,
If you've been following the planet[1], you'd know that my GSoC project
this year was packaging for the Fedora Medical SIG. I packaged quite a
few of them during the GSoC period[2]. The issue here is that I cannot
maintain these packages: I do not use them. Are any maintainers here
inte
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 14:09 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Still needs the period in the description.
>
> Note that if you're including this for Fedora 16, you'll want to talk
> to the
> translation team, as this is a new translatable string.
>
> Bill
Hello Bill,
Thanks for the info. I shall
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:12 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) said:
> > On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 10:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:28:38AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > &
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 10:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:28:38AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > You may have noticed a lot of packaging activity on the fedora-medical
> > front[1]. There are still quite a few package
Hello,
You may have noticed a lot of packaging activity on the fedora-medical
front[1]. There are still quite a few packages in the review queue. Some
have been approved, and we'd like to get started with the comps group.
I've created a patch (attached). Please review it :)
If all's okay, I shall
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 08:43 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> Perhaps upstream could deliver N shared libraries, then at run time
> use
> dlopen() to load the one which corresponds to the database package
> that is being used.
>
>
Thank you for all the suggestions. I'll try the sub package method firs
base, postgresql, mysql
and sqlite.
>
> Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2011, 16:02:05 schrieb Ankur Sinha:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm working on packaging conquest[1] for fedora which can be built
> > against dbase,mysql, postgresql *and* mysql. Which one should I build
Hello,
I'm working on packaging conquest[1] for fedora which can be built
against dbase,mysql, postgresql *and* mysql. Which one should I build it
against? Should I build it against all of them and make different
subpackages??
I've uploaded the build scripts here if someone wants a peek
http://a
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:04 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> Hello Ankur,
>
> our current libjpeg-turbo build in Fedora is 100% API/ABI compatible
> with former ijg libjpeg 6b. I would recommend to simply package the
> application and try to build it against libjpeg-turbo. If something
> fails, feel free
Hello,
One of the packages[2] I am trying to package requires libjpeg from the
ijg[1]. Since fedora is using libjpeg-turbo, I wanted to know if libjpeg
and libjpeg are installable in parallel? Should I package libjpeg as a
build dep, or should I be trying to patch the source to use
libjpeg-turbo?
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:25 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am working on to package python-pylibmc [0], Please tell me how to
> handle soname for this package.
>
> [0]
> http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/pylibmc/python-pylibmc-1.2.0-1.20110805gitf01c31.fc15.src.rpm
> [1] http://kumarpr
Hello,
gnumed-server is already available in the fedora repositories. Adding
gnumed-client would complete the set.
Would someone please swap reviews with me on this one too?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728757
Bug 728757 - (gnumed) Review Request: gnumed - The gnumed client
--
Hello,
Would anyone want to swap reviews with me? I need this reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180
Bug 715180 - (FreeMat) Review Request: FreeMat - A free environment for
rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing
It would be a real good addition to th
Hello,
The build deps of xmedcon have all been packaged. Would someone please
swap reviews with me?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714328
Bug 714328 - (xmedcon) Review Request: xmedcon - A medical image
conversion utility and library
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http:
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 14:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Sure, I can probably pick one up. I don't have any unassigned right
> now but I'll settle for finishing up OpenImageIO[1] :)
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720411
>
>
I'm just finishing up with
Hello,
Would any one like to swap reviews :)?
These two are *very very* simple packages that need to be reviewed.
They're holding up xmedcon[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714327
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714326
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:02 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669911#c5
> Review Request: guestfs-browser - Guest filesystem browser
>
> Spec:
> http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/guestfs-browser/guestfs-browser.spec
> SRPM:
> http://oirase.annexia.or
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:49 +0100, John5342 wrote:
> If the problem is purely with the actual UseSWIG.cmake file and not
> with the supporting tools then as a temporary workaround you can stick
> the old UseSWIG.cmake file in a directory of it's own and somewhere in
> the CMakeLists.txt before "inc
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 08:17 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I can think of two possible solutions:
>
> 1. It will take a lot more steps but you can try to use the F15 file,
> something like:
> # mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --init
> # mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --install cmake (or the correct
> p
Hello,
In the cmake version residing in rawhide, the UseSWIG.cmake file is
broken. Upstream is aware of this. I've also filed a bug with fedora
here[1].
I'd like to find a temporary solution to this. gdcm cannot build in
rawhide, and a lot of fedora-medical related packages are failing to
build i
Hello,
Another *tiny* package review I'd like to swap. This one consists of a
single jar file :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719402
> [ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm
> ../SPECS/OSGi-bundle-ant-task.spec
> OSGi-bundle-ant-task-0.2.0-0.2s
701 - 800 of 894 matches
Mail list logo
