numpy-1.10.2-0.1rc1

his type of caption (0.1rc1) is not swallowed by the code. 'assimulo' is rebuilt successfully in a mock rawhide-tree by downgrading 'numpy' to the 1.10.1-6 release. Any suggestion? (upstream has already been contacted, uselessly) - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org

python-mysql broken dependencies in rawhide

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, python-mysql has broken dependencies in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=698817 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:

ote: You can > skip this check with --skip-nvr-check. See help for more info. > Rawhide is now populated by Python3.5 (and Python2.7) modules. Rebuild your package as new release in rawhide. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress

Re: Failing builds on rawhide

--nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/libsbml.spec https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9975/11819975/build.log - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fed

review swap

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, i have a couple of review requests in waiting: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215354 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267189 I'm willing to exchange them for two other. Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto

How to manage libraries with no stack canary

tly. SPEC file: http://fpaste.org/285749/ Scratch build on F22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1121 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Chec

log4cpp: Packages in testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, Is there any reason to leave log4cpp-1.1.1 in testing since over 7 months? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=log4cpp Maintainer is not responding. Thanks. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

Re: Review swaps

On 10/22/2015 05:04 PM, Jerry James wrote: > I need two packages reviews: > > 1. arb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272606 >This is a FLINT add-on that newer versions of sagemath want. I take it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272652 -- Antonio Tr

Re: tktable license clarification

On 10/18/2015 12:55 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > tktable package is newly under review; can someone clarify to me how > to identify its license? (license file attached) > > In particular, i have a doubt

Re: Un-retiring tktable package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/17/2015 12:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 10/17/2015 11:57 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi all, >> >> I wish take care of tktable package currently re

tktable license clarification

e user may feel exempt from this clause if they are below drinking age or think the author has already partaken of too many drinks. * Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.

Un-retiring tktable package

is not dead confirming that current release still works with latest TclTk, so, I think, upstream support is still valid. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https

Re: Un-retiring tktable package

On 10/17/2015 11:57 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > I wish take care of tktable package currently retired by Fedora. > This package was retired on 2012-02-06 due to lack of a maintainer, > also latest relea

Re: XSD on EPEL7

On 10/01/2015 05:35 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all. > > I need XSD on EPEL7. Is it possible a build? > > Package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xsd/ > Bugzilla request: https://bugzilla.redhat.

Re: XSD on EPEL7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/08/2015 05:19 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On 10/08/2015 03:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 10/01/2015 05:35 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >>> >>>

Re: XSD on EPEL7

On 10/08/2015 05:47 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 10/08/2015 05:30 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 10/08/2015 05:19 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > >> On 10/08/2015 03:13 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > >

Re: install custom rpm package: failed dependencies

scription : Intel(R) > Fortran Compiler 16.0 for Linux* > --- > > How can I solve this issue properly? Is there anything I can do > at build time or add in the spec file? I can fo course # rpm -i > --nodep

XSD on EPEL7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all. I need XSD on EPEL7. Is it possible a build? Package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xsd/ Bugzilla request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251682 Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter

Re: package naming question: IT++

t.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686 > > Cheers, > > Marco Please, read carefully this guide-lines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_gro up - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedora

Re: package naming question: IT++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/23/2015 10:24 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 09/23/2015 10:03 AM, Marco Driusso wrote: >> OK, many thanks for the replies. Go for plain 'itpp'. > >> For anyone interested in reviewing the package, this is the >>

Reviews swap

. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV8GyWAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8duIH

Re: Review Swap: libndn-cxx

/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884. Named Data Networking (NDN) is a content based Future Internet Architecture. This library provides the primitives to develop applications for NDN. Thanks! - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https

Re: Review Swap?

both your packages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: Review Swap?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/08/2015 09:23 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/08/2015 07:08 PM, Dave Johansen

gacutil and assembly without a strong name

://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono#gacutil_in_a_spec_file) and is not considered any strong-name to the maintainer (https://github.com/fbergmann/libSEDML/issues/10), how can i manage this situation? Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com

Re: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/04/2015 12:47 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: On 06/04/2015 12:46 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, is there something wrong

HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

-04 10:23:44 ERROR 404: Not Found. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

Re: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/04/2015 12:46 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, is there something wrong with my commit or with koji? https

Re: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/04/2015 12:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:27:52 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, is there something wrong with my commit or with koji? https

Fwd: clang++ compiler flags

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 - Forwarded Message Subject: clang++ compiler flags Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 21:05:55 +0200 From: Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com To: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi all, 'clang++' compiler is unable to use ARM %optflags

Compiling boost-related C++ projects

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all. Do exist packaging guidelines for building boost-related C++ projects with 'bjam' utility ? Are there particular rules or packages already in Fedora built with this method ? Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter

SeqAn downgrading

it. Is it a problem if i downgrade the current release of SeqAn on pkgdb until the new 2.0.0 is fully ready ? [1] http://www.seqan.de/ [2] http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=18320 [3] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=18665 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter

Re: Help understanding failing Koji build

- -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVTQDeAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8IjEH/332HVJkHr

Re: Help understanding failing Koji build

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/08/2015 08:58 PM, Taylor Braun-Jones wrote: On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: root.log -- tail: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=9687732name

Re: Help understanding failing Koji build

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/08/2015 10:04 PM, Taylor Braun-Jones wrote: On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: suitesparse has been retired on EPEL6 (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package

Re: Help understanding failing Koji build

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/08/2015 09:28 PM, Taylor Braun-Jones wrote: On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: Your koji build requires suitesparse-devel = 3.4.0-9 DEBUG util.py:388: Error

Re: sundials updated - bionetgen and ascend depend on it

build this for rawhide if you (sagitter) wish. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207628 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https

Re: sundials updated - bionetgen and ascend depend on it

can build this for rawhide if you (sagitter) wish. Thank you Mukundan. I will rebuild it today. * bionetgen fails to build from source https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9361549 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206950 Thanks, Mukundan. - -- Antonio Trande

Linterna Magica

? Are there problems as it is a script? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1

Re: Linterna Magica

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/05/2015 04:57 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qui, 2015-02-05 at 16:43 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. Linterna Magica (http://linternamagica.org/#what-is-it) is a userscript for watching web video clips inside a browser without

Re: Linterna Magica

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/05/2015 06:02 PM, Patrik Novotný wrote: On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:14:23 +0100 Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: I'm testing the script with IceCat after a simple copy of linternamagica.user.js in the $HOME/.gnuzilla/icecat

Re: Linterna Magica

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/05/2015 08:12 PM, poma wrote: On 05.02.2015 16:43, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. Linterna Magica (http://linternamagica.org/#what-is-it) is a userscript for watching web video clips inside a browser without the proprietary flash

Re: Flash plugin 0-day vulnerability in the wild

are somewhat protected, and of course you run with setenforce 1. sandbox -X will also add more protection. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https

Re: smuxi builds stalled

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/20/2015 12:21 AM, Jeff Peeler wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 02:41:25PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 13:59:29 +0100 Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all

smuxi builds stalled

/tree/smuxi.spec - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1

Re: R: Re: Screen low resolution

600 start0 end 0 total 600 clock 61.00Hz 640x480 (0x17e) 18.432MHz h: width 640 start0 end 0 total 640 skew0 clock 28.80KHz v: height 480 start0 end 0 total 480 clock 60.00Hz Driver loaded ? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http

R: Re: Screen low resolution

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/03/2015 04:00 PM, gil wrote: Il 03/01/2015 15.03, Antonio Trande ha scritto: On 01/03/2015 01:33 PM, punto...@libero.it wrote: i think xorg-x11-drv-nouveau regards gil You must check if the nVidia video driver is loaded and if it is, check

Re: Screen low resolution

clock 60.00Hz Driver loaded ? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1

Re: chromium

for Chromium, there should be some effort to work with or encourage a 3rd party or fix whatever package might be holding up someone else from implementing it (ie if it's clang compiling or whatever. I dont understand. What has to do the browser with a wireless driver problem? - -- Antonio Trande

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

it by default by changing the loop:throttled option. Hello seems not currently enabled on Firefox 34.0 (Fedora 21). - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https

Re: Review swap

. Please, review this package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114737. -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -- devel

Re: iccjpeg.h errors

Hi David. On 11/06/2014 01:03 PM, David Tardon wrote: Hi, On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:17:27PM +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. I don't know how to fix these errors during IceCat compilation. Lately I tried to adapt Fedora compilations flags but there is wrong something. Here the log

iccjpeg.h errors

://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Icecat/icecat.spec -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: iccjpeg.h errors

Hi Dan. On 11/05/2014 06:44 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:17 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. I don't know how to fix these errors during IceCat compilation. Lately I tried to adapt Fedora compilations flags but there is wrong something. Here the log: http

Re: iccjpeg.h errors

getting used? Those are where the defines in question come from, and perhaps some options in jconfig.h are different on this build than in past builds. Of course. jconfig.h: http://ur1.ca/ipfqi jmorecfg.h: http://ur1.ca/ipfrg -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org

Re: Request new package

/) and point out missing upgrade of sheepdog. Maintainer will be directly contacted and will be possible to talk with him/her about eventual packaging collaborations. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Broken dependencies in F21

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [freesteam] freesteam-ascend-2.1-6.20140724svn753.fc21.armv7hl requires libascend.so.1 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/201840.html - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http

Re: Broken dependencies: freesteam

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/25/2014 02:46 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. On 08/25/2014 01:39 PM, build

Re: js/src/configure issue on Firefox

'configure'. It wasn't a timestamp issue as I thought. Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Fwd: js/src/configure issue on Firefox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. I'm working on Icecat-31's RPM building but I'm blocked by a strange problem. Have you never seen something like that? .. STOP! /home/sagitter/rpmbuild/BUILD/icecat-31.1.1/js/src/configure has changed and needs to be run again. Please rerun

fedora-review: 'Illegal return' warnings

, output: stdout:None stderr:./review-env.sh: line 7: unset: `BASH_FUNC_module()': not a valid identifier What they are? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https

Re: EPEL CentOS curator group proposal

by taking part on EPEL and by integrating any special (previously discussed) packaging need . -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 ___ epel-devel

scalapack-2.0.2-5.fc21

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. scalapack-2.0.2-5.fc21 is still waiting for pushing in stable since 10 days. It's stopping updates of other packages. Is there any reason to leave it in pending? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http

EPEL telegram-cli packaging on ppc64

/build.log [2] https://github.com/vysheng/tg/issues/239 Any idea? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1

Issue during generating header files

are not performed so auto-header.h file is not created: ./bin/generate ./auto/scheme.tlo auto/auto.c ./bin/generate -H ./auto/scheme.tlo auto/auto-header.h Regards. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key

Re: Issue during generating header files

On Mon 01 Sep 2014 07:09:34 PM CEST, Mathieu Bridon wrote: Hi, On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 19:03 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. I don't understand why same code is not compiled with rpmbuild unlike when I compile in local. This is compiled with rpmbuild: http://fpaste.org/130139

Re: Issue during generating header files

, try removing %{?_smp_mflags} from the make arguments (and comment about it). Yes, this is already advised by upstream (https://github.com/vysheng/tg/issues/235) and it's true. Thanks. PS Have you received my mail about coin-or-Ipopt? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org

Re: Review Swap

=1128754 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUAHymAAoJED2vIvfUANbECJsP/2UOXtyrYDlL93ZTbJ2iuBMG

Re: Broken dependencies: freesteam

-10.20140710svn4695.fc20.x86_64 I don't know what's the problem... - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT

Re: Broken dependencies: freesteam

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It looks like your repoquery running over f20, not f21 I forgot, these messages are arrived some days ago without any RPM change over f21 and f22. I would try to rebuild ascend to see if that fixes things. Okay. - -- Antonio Trande mailto

Re: Review swaps

? -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swaps

On 07/29/2014 07:45 PM, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: We are victims of same man :D Victim is kind of a harsh word. I suspect something has happened in Real Life that is making him extra busy. It's a way to saying

Re: Compiler flags and memory usage

On 06/16/2014 12:12 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Antonio Trande wrote: To pass these problems, I had to decrease '-O' optimization flag gradually to '-O1' or '-O0', latest attempt is the removal of '-pipe' from RPM_OPT_FLAGS. What's best choice in these cases? Definitely not -O0

Re: Compiler flags and memory usage

Given today's memory prices ... just buy an additional ram stick and be done with it ;) I wish but my hardware does not support more than 4GB of RAM. :( -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG

Compiler flags and memory usage

' or '-O0', latest attempt is the removal of '-pipe' from RPM_OPT_FLAGS. What's best choice in these cases? Which flags should never be removed/changed? [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105730 [2] http://www.seqan.de/ Regards. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org

Re: Compiler flags and memory usage

Errata corrige. On 06/15/2014 06:03 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: These compilations have been particularly annoying because it was nearly impossible to compile on my PC without blocks dependent by hardly memory usage. These compilations have been particularly annoying because it was nearly

Re: Compiler flags and memory usage

RAM is not adequate. Even if, maybe, not even koji seems to can build pair_align.cpp keeping all RPM_OPT_FLAGS. -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Computational chemistry softwares orphaned in F20

) and mMass tool for the analytical chemistry already in Fedora. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird

Re: Orphaning most of my packages

the remaining bits that need a new home: * plotutils * python-gudev * python-icalendar * python-webdav-library * freemind plotutils releases seems suspended since 2009. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-10 16:00 UTC)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/09/2014 09:53 PM, James Antill wrote: On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 20:45 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: I don't see the topic about bundled files in Icecat ( https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/391). It's still pending. AFAIK it's not, if you

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-10 16:00 UTC)

/ticket/391). It's still pending. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http

Re: qmake-qt4 DEFINES issue

On 03/23/2014 03:17 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Antonio Trande wrote: I need your help with F1LT application[1]. Its latest release (3.0.0) seems not work even if little things are changed in SPEC file. I see you already resolved your problem with upstream's help: https://bitbucket.org/pieczar

qmake-qt4 DEFINES issue

/name/f1lt?_csrf_token=c6813dd12c379d1616574a2fcffc59e335152fc5 [2] http://www.fpaste.org/85836/ [3] https://bitbucket.org/pieczar/f1lt/issue/3/f1lt-commit-7440f9a-does-not-run - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Icecat package review has NOT the goal to replace Firefox in Fedora. I wish to offer the opportunity to everyone of try a browser like so a GNU user would do. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

. Latest release is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6455790 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using

Re: review swap - coin-or-Osi

take it. Don't worry about the swap; I have some packages but they are not ready for the review yet. ;) - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: Lack of response about sponsorship

a packager candidate already gets moving so that he/she can be helped in his/her new experiences. - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: svn build issue

files as Susi Lehtola said in a previous mail. In fact, your package is now built in rawhide. Maybe, someone knows a most elegant way to overcome this issue. :) - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

dbh and/or DBH

. - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2013 08:32 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: On 12.09.2013 19:45, Antonio Trande wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2013 07:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi, I've posted the following package review requests: - #1007539

Re: Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2013 09:36 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Okay. So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor. Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002251 ;) Btw, you

Re: Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

sure they are still under development ? - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird

scalapack armv7hl not found

/koji/buildinfo?buildID=156903 Why is it not recognized ? - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org Homepage: http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http

Re: scalapack armv7hl not found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/28/2013 06:03 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: I've just imported it from arm koji to koji. It should now be fine Thank you Dennis. - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org Homepage: http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com GPG

Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Finished! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5664056 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5664100 Thank you all. - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org Homepage: http

Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines

/MUMPS/MUMPS.mod2.spec - -- - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org Homepage: http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: Following MPI packaging guidelines

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/24/2013 06:56 PM, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote: On 24/07/13 05:04 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: This phrase in MPI guidelines is little clear for me: Software that supports MPI MUST be packaged also in serial mode [i.e. no MPI

Following MPI packaging guidelines

mean serial mode ? :) - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org Homepage: http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR7

Re: find-lang.sh search path

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/02/2013 09:02 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 23:28:00 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: Then let's not hack the paths, but find out why %find_lang doesn't find the files. If %name is not part of the filenames, normally you

find-lang.sh search path

/qgifer-0.2.1-1.fc19.x86_64 pl --with-qt No translations found for pl in /home/sagitter/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qgifer-0.2.1-1.fc19.x86_64 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sbQ58D (%install) - Antonio Trande mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org Homepage: http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >