On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 23:52 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
2 karma points *including* a proventester. That is:
1 proventester + 1 non-pt
OR
2 proventester
are sufficient. And yes, that is the current policy.
Uh, that's the current policy for critical
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 12:26 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The various update streams flow differently. For a normal day,
EPEL4/5/6 might have about 2-20 updates. It might be practical to look
at all these for a quick glance. f14 (updates and testing) has around
30-50ish. f13 has around 5-20, and
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
Maybe the bodhi messages confused me. When I logon to a.f.o/updates it
prominently displays:
Bodhi is now enforcing the Package Update Acceptance
Criteria across all Fedora releases
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
You've tried to select stable as the target already when submitting
the updates, and bodhi rejected that. With the CVEs mentioned for Mediawiki,
why didn't you choose security instead of stable?
But I did. All packages are marked as
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:54 +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
This is probably part of the problem, I have been trying to push all 5
packages that are now in testing with bodhi rejecting due to autoqa.
Even packages that do have
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 08:01 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
Are you sure? I requested a push of the packages to stable (some were in
testing for a week, others were security updates) and the message was
that it doesn't pass AutoQA, so it converted to request to push only
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 21:19 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
On 04/16/2011 01:52 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
Others have already commented on this, but I wanted to re-state that
AutoQA is only in an informative mode right now. Any bodhi comments made
by AutoQA have no karma and are not used for anything
Hi,
I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa rejected
the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the packages
to be properly pushed to fN+1 stable before green-lighting the
matching package for fN. Do I have to wait until the packages for f15
are pushed to
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 23:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:52:32 +0300, AT wrote:
Hi,
I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa rejected
the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the packages
to be properly pushed to fN+1
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:30 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:20:55 -0500
Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/26/2011 12:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Does anyone have a means to contact Axel Thimm and confirm he's ok
and if he wishes to maintain his packages
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 13:26 +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
On 08/18/2010 01:21 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:10:29PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
Fedora Engineering Services
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Engineering_Services) received
request to get rid of file
11 matches
Mail list logo
