I am getting the error message below in response to a `fedpkg mockbuild` command. What am I doing
wrong ?
>fedpkg mockbuild
... snip ...
ERROR: Mock config 'epel-9-x86_64' not found, see errors above.
Here is my system information:
>git branch
* epel9
rawhide
>uname -a
Linux brad-mobile
>uname -a
Linux fedora 6.2.15-200.fc37.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 11 15:56:33 UTC 2023 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>mock --version
3.5
>git branch
* epel9
f37
f38
rawhide
>dnf info fedpkg
... snip ...
Name : fedpkg
Version : 1.44
Release : 4.fc37
I am getting the following message when I try to execute
fedpkg mockbuild
in the epel9 branch for my package:
No matching package to install: 'python3dist(build)'
Does this mean that the python build package
https://pypi.org/project/build/
is not available in epel9 ?
I do not understand the state of the following build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40063178
When I attempt to resubmit it I get:
cppad>fedpkg build
Could not execute build: Package cppad-2020.0-1.fc31 has already been built
Note: You can skip this check with
I do not understand this error message; i.e., I have no idea what the cause is ?
Looking at the informaiton for the build
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40063178
The only failure message I see is
GenericError: cannot update build 1425936, state: COMPLETE
The output
What does the waring below mean ?
cppad>fedpkg push
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/model.py:526:
UserWarning: 'git_checkout_notify_t' has no values explicitly defined;
next version will refuse to guess which integer type it is meant to be
#
I am reading buildroot so that I can test the installed version of the include
files
(better testing that using the ones in the build directory).
Perhaps rpm-lint can be fixed so it does not generate a warning in this
case ?
On 2/4/2016 6:22 AM, Brad Bell wrote:
I have comments at the top
I have comments at the top of the spec file that explain the reason for
the warning below. In addition, I have posted messages about this
warning on this list; see
project.org/thread/GI3L74J47OLRTYLQIMSEUA7SUZR5VLU7/#JUUSDFET2HBPUDIP3G7CPHB7Q7XCCLEG
Should I just ignore the message below ?
On
Topics:
1. distutils does not find g++ on Fedora 20 (Brad Bell)
2. Re: distutils does not find g++ on Fedora 20 (Thomas Spura)
3. Re: [python] Add python2_version_nodots macro (Matej Stuchlik)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon
:
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 06:32:20 -0700
From: Brad Bell bradb...@seanet.com
To: python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: distutils does not find g++ on Fedora 20
Message-ID: 54426be4.1010...@seanet.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format
with
createrepo_c-libs-0.4.0-1.fc20.x86_64
...
How does one fix these type of errors ?
On 10/28/2014 5:43 AM, Brad Bell wrote:
Thanks Alec:
I was using the executable g++ which was installed by the gcc-c++
package, so the gcc-c++ package was installed on the Fedora 20 system.
Your comment about locate
agree ?
On 10/26/2014 5:51 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2014-10-26 13:35, Brad Bell wrote:
I have a python setup.py script that works on Fedora 19 and not
Fedora 20. I have tried posting a question about it to python-devel; see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/python-devel/2014-October/000639
I have a python setup.py script that works on Fedora 19 and not Fedora
20. I have tried posting a question about it to python-devel; see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/python-devel/2014-October/000639.html
but have not gotten any response.
Would someone please direct me to the proper
If this is not the correct mailing list for my question below, please
redirect me to the proper list.
I have a python setup.py script that works on Fedora-19 and does not
work on Fedora-20.
The error on Fedora-20 is:
---
[bradbell@localhost pycppad-20140710]$ ./setup.py build_ext
I recently did a build for f19 and got the console output:
[bradbell@localhost cppad]$ fedpkg build
Building cppad-2014.2-1.fc19 for f19-candidate
Created task: 6484083
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6484083
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
I often use the web page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO
and have a few edits to suggest. Who would be the proper person to contact ?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Update to 0.0.2 -p
On 02/28/2013 05:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 05:02:56AM -0700, Brad Bell wrote:
I often use the web page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO
and have a few edits to suggest. Who would be the proper person to contact ?
It's a wiki
In the bugzilla report below, the link
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4959059
works but the other links below do not.
If I follows the link above, I see the message
Result
BuildError: error building package (arch i686), mock exited with
status 1; see build.log for
I am upgrading a package to the new version of its upstream source for
2013. The corresponding correctness tests have built and run fine for
the master, f18, and f17 branches.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4848365name=build.log
The www.coin-or.org server seems to be down, so I have placed a copy of
the CppAD spec file at
http://www.seanet.com/~bradbell/cppad.spec
On 11:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:54:13 -0800, Brad wrote:
... snip ...
Can you upload the spec file to some public place?
On 11:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 06:57:09 -0800, Brad wrote:
I am using the compile directive
-I%{buildroot}%{_includedir}
during the test phase of a projects rpm build. This tests the installed
copy of the include files instead of the copy in the distribution
I am using the compile directive
-I%{buildroot}%{_includedir}
during the test phase of a projects rpm build. This tests the installed
copy of the include files instead of the copy in the distribution (and
hence is a better test of the install).
The problem is that rpmlint complains with
Kevin:
Thanks for you message about the new sources.
Unfortunately, I do not have a copy of the mail message to reply
directly to,
so I am including its web address below:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-January/147704.html
I uploaded a new version of the upstream source
I have a case where a package is noarch and it provides pkg-config support.
The problem is that pkg-config expects a noarch file corresponding to
the package to be stored in
${_libdir}/pkgconfig
and rpmlint complains that
cppad.spec:112: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package devel
24 matches
Mail list logo