/dump
(or similar). How do I do that and continue to play nicely with abrt?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 20:00 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:50 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
That page suggests that when abrt is in use, core files would be
generated in the location set by abrt, which defaults
to /var/spool/abrt. However, I have abrtd running
On Dec 5, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 00:08 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 12:06 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I posted about this a couple of days ago to the test list; but I've gotten
no response so I'm fishing
I posted about this a couple of days ago to the test list; but I've gotten no
response so I'm fishing here.
I'm not sure if this is a genuine freeze; but I have not managed to elicit a
response to keyboard/mouse input.
When booting Fedora 18 Beta, I see this:
dracut-cmdline[121]:
-32)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
openvrml BuildRequires java-devel. At first, I though the provider for
java-devel just changed and I happened to be unlucky timing-wise; so I
rebuilt openvrml. But I'm still seeing this. How come?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 21:22 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Thu, 17 May 2012 21:51:40 -0400
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com escribió:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 14:56 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
openvrml has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 09:34 +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
On 6 May 2012 03:19, Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com wrote:
Does mock have problems with non-local user accounts? When I do
$ fedpkg mockbuild
I get:
ERROR: Must be member of 'mock' group to run mock
Hat Bugzilla?)
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-specific. Any standard that doesn't take that into
account needs some improvement.
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:11 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 à 00:01 -0400, Braden McDaniel a écrit :
Can someone explain (or point to) the rationale appending these to PATH
rather than prepending them? I would have expected user binaries to
supersede system
.
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
: ltdl.h not found
The package has:
BuildRequires: libtool-ltdl-devel
Why might this be happening? Did ltdl.h get moved?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
being reopened with the new stack
trace attached?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
downgrade to libldb-0.9.10-25.fc15 and SSSD will
work again.
Figuring this would be fixed by now, I upgraded to libldb-1.0.2-1.fc16;
but now I'm seeing the same problem again.
What's the state of this?
(Unfortunately, yum is no longer letting me downgrade after upgrading to
this version.)
--
Braden
://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.tech.js-engine/5uQ9oIPyio4
Perhaps we should just wait for this?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 20:23 -0800, Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 02/13/2011 12:32 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Isn't there yet more breakage coming, as well?
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.tech.js-engine/5uQ9oIPyio4
Perhaps we should just wait
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2011 12:31 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:36 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 06:10:25, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Something
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:36 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 06:10:25, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Something in a recent round of updates seems to have hosed use of
LDAP-based user accounts for my rawhide installation. (My LDAP server
is on a different machine
to add
autoreconf --force
before
%configure
to regenerate configure for new option.
Nope. Still same error.
Any ideas?
What package is this? Are you quite certain its configure is
autoconf-derived?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 09:16 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 04.02.11 13:31, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 21:12 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 31.01.11 02:22, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
I've recently
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:04 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 08.02.11 04:44, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
what does systemctl status NetworkManager.service say?
After booting and logging in as root:
# systemctl status
Something in a recent round of updates seems to have hosed use of
LDAP-based user accounts for my rawhide installation. (My LDAP server
is on a different machine; the rawhide one just doesn't seem to be able
to use it.)
Is anyone else seeing this?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 21:12 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 31.01.11 02:22, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
manually
On 2/4/11 3:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:33 +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
Hi,
beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
for final release that should be out on 7th,
On 2/4/11 4:11 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 15:41 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On 2/4/11 3:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
[snip]
Could we please either have boost.m4 packaged in Fedora, or at least
changes for running with the latest boost in Fedora integrated upstream
On 2/3/11 1:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 02:22 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
manually. As far as I can tell, it is configured
On 2/1/11 6:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 02/01/2011 05:05 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On 1/31/11 4:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting
(I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
I would assume its the same error
On 1/31/11 4:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting
(I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
I would assume its the same error?
So far, I have not identified an SELinux denial that appears to be
associated with this.
this?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'm pretty much a novice at both mock and chroot. Where can I find out
how to change to the mock build chroot (using fedpkg or otherwise) so
that I can debug a failed mock build?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 21:54 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 21:33 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I'm pretty much a novice at both mock and chroot. Where can I find out
how to change to the mock build chroot (using fedpkg or otherwise) so
that I can debug a failed mock build
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 00:03 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 23:57 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Thanks. Now, how do I get fedpkg to preserve it? I see (when doing
fedpkg mockbuild):
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('clean_on_failure=True')
So, where do I
.
Can anybody help me understand the scenario here? Should we start
filtering out push requests that have more than -2 karma?
Updating F13 now works; but a yum upgrade from F12 still seems busted.
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 06:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 06/29/2010 06:17 AM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Updating F13 now works;
Does it?
Not for me.
Sigh... You're right. Some other updates happened and I thought this
one was included. But it just got skipped.
--
Braden McDaniel
), that could
result in some rather exotic errors.
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 17:18 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote:
Am 01.04.2010 23:01, schrieb Braden McDaniel:
[snip]
It looks like this line in CMakeLists.txt:
SET(libdir \${exec_prefix}/${LIB_INSTALL_DIR})
should be
SET(libdir ${LIB_INSTALL_DIR
performing an upgrade using the F13
Alpha DVD. This option only appeared for the full install.
I seem to recall the same behavior for the F12 DVD.
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
of
libopenvrml-devel and its Obsoletes: openvrml-devel aren't sufficient.
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 1/27/10 5:13 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
... looking pretty good. Thanks everybody!
Did it go so well we can do it again?
That is, is there any chance of getting Boost 1.42.0 into F13?
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
files go into %{_datadir}/pkgconfig
That's helpful, thanks!
And just to be clear, this is not Fedora-specific. You can also find
this in man pkg-config, where the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
is described.
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
Hi,
I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
xulrunner
41 matches
Mail list logo
