://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/show_bug.cgi?id=654374
Thanks
LG
Meego haven't officially released any tablet UX plan yet, we still
need to wait some time.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
Currently, pitivi 0.13.4 in fedora crashes frequently, I want to
update pitivi to the latest verison. But we need to update
gstreamer-python to 0.10.19 first, can anybody help to contact Xavier
Lamien?
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634093
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel
=507966
--
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
of naming guildeline is providing a consistent
naming convetion for the whole Fedora distribution. I hope some
volunteers can help me to write a formal guideline draft.
[1]http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/python-devel/2009-October/000193.html
Regards,
Chen Lei
of these
appear to *actually* be required by gwibber - bug 632621 filed.
Bill
--
Hi all,
I'll update pino to the latest snapshot for F14+ soon which already
add support for oauth.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
is not benefical to fedora.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
It seems upstream released a new version one months ago.
See
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2663
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-mobility):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=626122
contextkit(optional dep for qt-mobility):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=613881
libqttracker(optional dep for qt-mobility):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=614075
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel
-specific files
- scripts: the directory where scripts are added
- data: the directory where data file are added
[1]http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=python3.git;a=commitdiff;h=997d5a24f2ed0138ce205d7709f5a6acb52fd531
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
2010/8/21 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com:
Orphan pitivi
Taken, co-maintainers are welcome.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw
--
You can add %check section to the spec, then you could test if those
files are available when building libguestfs.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
numarray is being phased out and replaced by numpy for 4 years, two
packages will be affected after retiring python-numarray in fedora,
however both of them can also work file with numpy.
repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires python-numarray
python-numarray-0:1.5.2-10.fc14.x86_64
2010/8/19 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com:
numarray is being phased out and replaced by numpy for 4 years, two
packages will be affected after retiring python-numarray in fedora,
however both of them can also work file with numpy.
repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires python-numarray
python
=markup
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'll take SOAPpy, co-maintainers for all of my packages are welcome.
Full list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/supercyper
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Lennart,
I found that systemd-units depends on pkgconfig, is this dependency
really needed for minimum systemd?
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/8/10 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com:
Le 09/08/2010 09:38, Chen Lei a écrit :
It seems silvercity is packaged in many distributions, e.g. gentoo
freebsd mandriva PLD.
It fact, RPM I found only provide the python library.
From the upstream README file :
Contributions
2010/8/8 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com:
Le 08/08/2010 10:28, Chen Lei a écrit :
I can help to review mysql-connector-c and Silvercity, howerver we may
need a approve from FESCo for bundling scintilla in silvercity.
I don't plan to package silvercity,
but rather keep both (scintilla
will
submit them.
Regards.
--
I can help to review mysql-connector-c and Silvercity, howerver we may
need a approve from FESCo for bundling scintilla in silvercity.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
is identical, since
assistant_adp is dropped by qt 4.7, I suggest to split html docs into
another subpackage or simply drop html docs. Personally, I only use
assistant to open qch format docs.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
sudo yum install gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux
Package gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux-0.10.15-8.fc13.x86_64 is
obsoleted by gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.19-1.fc13.x86_64 which is
already installed
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
2010/8/5 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan: nas
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2
speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2
speech-dispatcher requires nas-devel
It seems a lot of java packages will be orphaned, should we contact
JAVA-SIG and maven2/eclipse/intellij-idea maintainers?
Regrads,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/coreutils in fedora
rawhide are the latest version. Also, some packages which under active
development are not updated for several years not just several months.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
to 3.x. 2.8 branch
is pretty old, and few people want to test it(2.9 is very mature now and 3.0
is also released a while ago).
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/8/1 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com:
I received this:
unuran has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
On x86_64:
unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires /sbin/install-info
unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires /sbin/install-info
On i386:
unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.i686
changes to the remote git repo?
Try 'git status'
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
).
--
Pat
--
It seems a considerable amount of packages in fedora don't update for
years. I think we should add some policy to address those unmaintained
packages, currently even provenpackager are not allowed to commit
those packages diretly.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel
,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
you maybe handle this in fedpkg commit -p):
pyfedpkg.FedpkgError: There are unpushed changes in your repo
fedora-packager-0.5.0.1-3.fc12.noarch
Martin
--
I now use 'git checkout -t origin/f14/master' instead of 'fedpkg
switch-branch f14' temporarily.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel
the branches
(if I have same spec for more than one branch).
I think using git merge or git cherry-pick will be better than coping
files from other branch like cvs, git is much smarter than cvs.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
to stable for a long time even for a security issue.
Regard,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
like this idea, maintaining a fedora
specfic ffmepg isn't a easy job.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
any serious issues, then we
can backport it to F14 Beta. Firefox 4 is definitely an amazing
feature for Fedora 14.
Regard,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
?
You're going to need to include all applicable license texts, sorry.
~spot
--
If a GPL binary is compiled with mixed BSD and GPL source files,
should we also add the BSD license text along with GPL text?
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
of using jack as package name.
FYI, debian use jackd2 as package name for jack-audio-connection-kit 2.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
a public VCS(e.g. fennec-qt)
or public VCS is not active currently(e.g. scim-panel-vkb-gtk[1]).
Meego 1.0 use scim-panel-vkb-gtk 0.1.7, meego 1.1 use 0.1.8. but the
latest version in the git repo is 0.1.6.
[1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615047
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
consistent with
upstream RPM version, we can also report some bugs to meego bugzilla
directly.
[1]http://git.moblin.org/cgit.cgi/scim-panel-vkb-gtk/
[2]http://repo.meego.com/
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/7/16 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se:
fre 2010-07-16 klockan 18:26 +0800 skrev Chen Lei:
I think using git repo for meego packages have more
harm than benefit, because the most important feature for rpm is
people can validate the md5sum of the source tarball easily. Unless
project have dozens of packages(or maybe nearly one hundred
packages), most of them don't provide tarballs at all except tarballs
extracted from upstream SRPM. Also, some of them don't have a proper
tag in the git repo or git version is older than SRPM version.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
gnupg 2.x is named as gnupg2 in fedora.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Request for gnupg in bugzilla, if no one opposes
reviving gnupg in koji .
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/7/10 pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/9 pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com:
I think it's not easy to persuade upstream to do so. Look deep at
meego-panel-zones, the HEAD version in git repo
to meego-* in meego 1.0.
From
http://meego.gitorious.org/meego-netbook-ux/meego-panel-devices/blobs/meego-1.0/configure.ac
AC_PREREQ(2.53)
AC_INIT([moblin-panel-devices], [0.1.34], [http://bugs.meego.com])
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
released tarballs for its packages in public git
repo, but memeo and meego don't release tarball publicly. I think we
have to use tarballs in the src.rpm for meego specfic packages.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
if we assume the base package depends on -libs
subpackage?
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
by using PGO already. Is there
anyone who would like to volunteer to write a packaging guideline
about using PGO?
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/7/7 Christopher Brown snecklif...@gmail.com:
If you need a co-maintainer for this please let me know. I need scons
as a build tool for one of my packages.
Thanks
--
Christopher Brown
--
Feel free to contact Gérard directly to add you as a co-maintainer of scons :)
Regards,
Chen Lei
:)
Do you mind to find more co-maintainers for your packages before you come back?
Regrads,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/6/18 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
Following the process
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Is someone able to get in touch with Gérard Milmeister.(gemi)
I can't find any activity of him from koji and bugzilla in the past
eight
for
more than 8 months.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
, no
packager respond yet.
Regards.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/7/2 Chitlesh GOORAH chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com:
Hello there,
I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
It looks like Petr Pisar just fixed some FTBTS bugs in rawhide after
mass-rebuiding of all
escalating to FESCo is only suitable for changes which are
controversial between different people, we should have another policy
to treat those non-responsive issues, maintainers should respond on
bugzilla report in time.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
.
What is your opinion about this proposal?
Regards, Adam
--
Only three packages in the rawhide depend on -utils:
renrot
gallery2-jpegtran
gocr
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/6/30 Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
Rawhide [1]. I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in libjpeg-turbo-devel instead.
Unfortunately, when it pulls
conflicts.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
depends on libjpeg explicitly,
I don't know how libjpeg can be pulled in.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/6/30 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:21:37 +0800, Chen wrote:
libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes
libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils.
root.log of
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2282066
libjpeg-turbo
provides: libjpeg-6b-47, the current libjpeg in the repo provides
libjpeg-6b-46. I think there are no perfect solution for
renaming/splitting packages, we should fix those broken dependencies
finally instead of staying on workaround.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel
2010/6/22 David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 08:40 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
Am Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:34:02 -0400
schrieb David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 01:57 +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
Thanks, that's a great help - I hadn't seen that page. Looks
need notice libguestfs maintainer first, because this change
will break this special package.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
not rebuild all python modules along with gcc 4.5? It may avoid of
rebuild python-related packages twice?
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
util-vserver556099 - CLOSED
FYI, util-vserver is re-enabled to ship static libraries again by the
maintainer now after spot disabled it.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
known. Packaging them as normal python modules is Okay, but since
Zope2 contains more than 100 modules, packaging/maintaining so many
modules is not easy work.
Chen Lei
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
. no linux distributions include zope yet.
I think we need to set up a third party repo first like texlive 2010
before finally determined to submit those components for package
review.
Chen Lei
___
python-devel mailing list
python-devel
if we want to
revive long retired zope and plone in the cvs. It will be much easier
if we have an atuomatic spec generation tool like cpan2spec, it's
entirely possible to write a such tool for python modules that using
setuptools in setup.py.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel
place for python ui don't need
change.
Chen Lei.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
sending a private
mail a month ago.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530565 for more details.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
serveral debuginfo subpackages. If you really want to do it, you can
tweak find-debuginfo.sh, but such tweak is normally unaccepted in
fedora except you have compelling reason.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
for that.
--
Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com
--
Yes, the obsoletes is necessary, if you don't add it, yum will only
pull in pidgin-evolution.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/6/9 Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com:
2010/6/9 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com:
Yes, the obsoletes is necessary, if you don't add it, yum will only
pull in pidgin-evolution.
For which operation? Can you elaborate a bit?
--
Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com
--
yum upgrade
2010/6/9 Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com:
2010/6/9 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com:
Yes, the obsoletes is necessary, if you don't add it, yum will only
pull in pidgin-evolution.
For which operation? Can you elaborate a bit?
--
Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com
2010/6/9 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:15:01 +0800, Chen wrote:
2010/6/9 Chen Lei:
Yes, the obsoletes is necessary, if you don't add it, yum will only
pull in pidgin-evolution.
For which operation? Can you elaborate a bit?
yum upgrade from 2.7.1-1
of the transaction set.
Competing Obsoletes = playing with fire.
I think it's accept in rawhide since it can provide a sane upgrade
path for dist upgrade.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Can anyone contact members in AOP alliance directly, maybe it's helpful?
e.g. Cédric Beus
http://beust.com/weblog/ (http://twitter.com/cbeust)
All members info see http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/members.html
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
subpackages.
Plus, he's also violating other guidelines, e.g. for this package:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=176308
Version contains a SVN revision tag which MUST be in Release instead
according to our guidelines. (Thanks to Chen Lei for pointing that out.)
(And look
rawhide
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/6/3 Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 20:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Chen Lei wrote:
Is it right for the maintainer to provide two separate subpackages,
one with the tranditional rc.d contents and one with an upstart
scripts and make the -upstart
system upstart scripts.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
, then leave tor binary
into -core subpackage, he also add an useless upstart conf as an
alternatives to initsrcipt, the package layout is very different with
tor upstream and other packages in fedora.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
2010/6/2 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Chen Lei wrote:
The maintainer refuse some others to co-maintain tor package or help
him to solve this issue. It's a bit complicated to fix this, fedora
policy seems don't permit provenpackagers to commit a package if the
maintainer are very
what they are but I'll
certainly let you know when I know more.
Peter
--
I somehow a bit worry about meego spin in fedora when considering some
compents in meego are forked, now mutter-mbl conflicts with mutter, it
may be unacceptable for F14 which will use gnome3 as default desktop.
Chen
://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
regardless the unwillingness of the package owner.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/5/30 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Valent Turkovic
Its under review. I'm waiting for a few upstream updates that need to
hit as part of the gnome 2.31.2 release. There's a few new packages,
some renames but most of it should be in the repos in the
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530565
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
or deluge(gtk ui) deluge-console deluge-web deluge-common.
Bundling UI and Core and pulling in gtk2 dependency is not a good idea
for deluge.
For flags subpackage, all I known is it's still a scratch guideline.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Maintainers_Flags_Policy
Regards,
Chen Lei
2010/5/30 Xose Vazquez Perez xose.vazq...@gmail.com:
TeX Live 2009 and Ruby 1.9
JBoss[1] is still a *big* deficit. Potential for f14/15 ?
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBoss
For Texlive 2010 and Ruby 1.9,See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
2010/5/30 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 00:39:14 -0400,
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
So, clearly, there's some disagreement about what's fixed and what's broken.
But printing out a passive-agressive warning to end-users is not the
solution. The error
and a metapackage seems quite strange.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
should ask his to orphan it on pkgdb, then others can take this
package and make an update.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/me-tv
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS LDFLAGS=-lm waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix}
-
waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --no-runtime-deps
All python modules are not needed in runtime, don't check them. Also,
the package is noarch, optflags is not needed.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel
2010/5/26 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com:
CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS LDFLAGS=-lm waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix}
-
waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --no-runtime-deps
All python modules are not needed in runtime, don't check them. Also,
the package is noarch, optflags is not needed.
Chen
Roughly 10% of a particular arch tree footprint on the mirrors.
Yanko
--
I suggest not to ship apidocs for all applications, very few people
actually need them.
Most developers only need apidocs for some paticular libraries.
Regards,
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
including debian, ubuntu, arch,
why it still be maintained in fedora?
Do we have a policy to remove long legacy libs?
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/5/25 Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au
I'm curious as to what Debian/Ubuntu are using as a replacement for
libpng10?
Debian updated libpng10 to libpng12 long ago, they don't keep multiversion
libpng. Almost all packages which still depend on libpng10 is dead.inupstream.
Chen Lei
2010/5/22 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
Hi,
On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick-c++
ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686
ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64
inkscape-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo