On 09/07/2011 05:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
As someone on the other side of this (although not strongly, I could
be convinced), I don't think thats my concern at all...
* As a maintainer you should only be pushing an update you feel
works/fixes something anyhow. Shouldn't that be an
On 07/11/2011 04:07 PM, Maciej Małecki wrote:
Hello everyone!
As it is my first mail to this list, let me briefly introduce myself:
I am Maciej Małecki, software developer based in Poznań, Poland. I've
been using Fedora since F11 (and I love it).
The point is: is there a chance to have
On 06/23/2011 09:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 20:22 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
wrote:
To fix [1] and [2] dependency rebuild required.
Scratch build successful [3], if someone can help on it, I'm ready
commit and push changes in git.
Rebuild for rawhide
On 06/22/2011 02:09 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 06/22/2011 10:56 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 06/22/2011 02:55 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Hi,
will Fedora 15's version of Firefox (currently 4.0.1) be updated to
Firefox 5?
The following koji builds let me asume it:
On 04/21/2011 12:11 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
No, they always just require +1 from anyone (or an X day wait). This
happens to be equivalent to the lowest possible autokarma setting, but
that's just a coincidence, it doesn't *mean* anything. If you set
autokarma higher,
On 04/13/2011 03:38 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Dear List,
I was just trying to update gnome-mplayer (not in fedora, but that is
irrelevant) which migrated from gconf to gsettings. The problem is, that
the standard scriptlets [1] do not run on upgrades, leaving the package
in a not working
On 04/12/2011 06:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 04/13/2011 06:47 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
commit 7986a8567a9dbb2a6f8187b91a021d5ad350f96f
Author: Christopher Ailloncail...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Apr 12 18:15:07 2011 -0700
Default browser is no longer read from prefs
It's
On 04/13/2011 04:01 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/13/2011 03:26 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 04/12/2011 06:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 04/13/2011 06:47 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
commit 7986a8567a9dbb2a6f8187b91a021d5ad350f96f
Author: Christopher Ailloncail...@redhat.com
Date: Tue
On 04/11/2011 05:45 PM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
gnuchess v5.08 is now licensed under the GPLv3+.
Already built in rawhide.
Will push builds to F15,F14,F13 later this week.
Same for xboard, v4.5.1 now in rawhide.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 04/12/2011 11:17 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
because I want to make a downgrade of the blender package on F15
I have increate the Epoch in the sPEC file. Unfortunately, I have got the
following error message from koji:
GenericError:
On 04/10/2011 06:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 18:19:26 -0700,
Christopher Ailloncail...@redhat.com wrote:
I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are based on
stable, not testing. I think that's something we need to address. It's
probably
On 04/11/2011 12:13 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
On 04/10/2011 07:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 18:19:26 -0700,
Christopher Ailloncail...@redhat.com wrote:
I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are based on
stable, not testing. I think that's
gnuchess v5.08 is now licensed under the GPLv3+.
Already built in rawhide.
Will push builds to F15,F14,F13 later this week.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/10/2011 01:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 12:45 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
And here we are, about to go down the same road again. I have an update
in updates-testing, it's getting no love, and the package that's in the
release is *known broken*. It has not been
On 11/15/2010 08:57 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:16:43 -0500 (EST)
Jaroslav Skarvadajskar...@redhat.com wrote:
Please could any FESCo member approve the takeover of rrdtool
(according to nonresponsive package maintainers policy)? Or should I
open ticket for this?
I'll
On 04/07/2011 08:38 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Fedora 15 Beta RC1
Please don't mix beta and RC together. Beta and RC are two
distinct parts of the release cycle, so it's confusing to see them
together, just like it would be confusing to see an announcement about
alpha beta.
--
devel mailing
On 04/08/2011 10:55 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, April 08, 2011 12:37:17 PM Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 04/07/2011 08:38 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Fedora 15 Beta RC1
Please don't mix beta and RC together. Beta and RC are two
distinct parts of the release cycle, so it's confusing
On 04/08/2011 01:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Would it make more sense to refer to these as Alpha Candidate, Beta
Candidate and Release Candidate ? ac{1,2,3}, bc{1,2}, rc1 ?
WFM!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/04/2011 12:48 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Okay, review is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693493
basically just pulled from the thunderbird 3.1.9 release.
Awesome, thanks! If nobody beats me to it, I'll get a package review
done in the next few days. Would love to
On 04/01/2011 08:13 AM, Jerry James wrote:
And, as an aside, that update still only has karma of 2. How do I
tell if either of the respondents is a proventester? Is that
indicated in the feedback somehow?
Their nick would show up as username (proventester) instead of just
username. A
On 04/01/2011 03:08 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm starting to take a look at this. First question is what version to
package. The latest released version is 1.0b2 but F14 has 1.0b3pre of
some unknown vintage. I'm guessing that moving back to 1.0b2 would cause
problems, but I'm not sure.
Up
On 09/22/2010 09:20 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Christopher Ailloncail...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/25/2010 03:13 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Christopher Ailloncail...@redhat.com wrote:
I missed the first notice of this go by, but I use zsh so can play with
it in the next few days. Can you post the
On 03/21/2011 12:26 PM, James Laska wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 18:49 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
How can I add tests for my package to Fedora AutoQA, eg. so that they
run (say) each time I build the package in Koji?
(Note: I'm not asking how to run an AutoQA server myself.)
Hey
On 03/12/2011 04:33 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 03/10/2011 12:05 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I've just submitted mono-2.10.1 for building and it's failed giving me
make[8]: Entering directory
`/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-2.10.1/mcs/tools/gacutil'
MCS [basic] gacutil.exe
Inconsistency
On 02/14/2011 10:36 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'm willing to be a co-maintainer, but probably won't get around to starting
a review on my own for a while. I use it in F14, so I'll eventually want it
in F15.
Splitting it out is the right thing.
One potential immediate issue is that it had a
On 02/14/2011 08:23 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Could someone illuminate what is happening with thunderbird-lightning for
F15? Looks like it was moved from the sunbird package to the thunderbird
package, only to be dropped from that:
* Wed Feb 9 2011 Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com
On 02/13/2011 12:32 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Isn't there yet more breakage coming, as well?
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.tech.js-engine/5uQ9oIPyio4
Perhaps we should just wait for this?
Those patches already landed in tracemonkey on Wednesday and
On 02/13/2011 08:35 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 20:23 -0800, Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 02/13/2011 12:32 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Isn't there yet more breakage coming, as well?
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.tech.js-engine/5uQ9oIPyio4
On 02/11/2011 11:49 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Dennis Gilmoreden...@ausil.us wrote:
asterisk
This one should be taken care of now. I suspect that something in
F15/rawhide changed that made Asterisk's build system think that an
optional dependency was now a
commit 47db636264024ac42c394bba9f0ac22ec33edda6
Author: Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 10 07:10:08 2011 -0800
Rebuild against newer libevent
perl-Event-Lib.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Event-Lib.spec b/perl
On 02/04/2011 10:00 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Hi all,
for gcc-4.6, xz compression changes, and to a lesser extent we will be doing a
mass rebuild starting monday. it will be done in a side tag with a lower than
normal priority so that you can still submit builds and not have to wait for
the
On 02/06/2011 01:38 PM, David wrote:
On 2/6/2011 3:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 18:01:58 +,
Paul F. Johnsonp...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote:
Any help on fixing these issues, please let me know - they're both
driving me mad!!
metacity and gnome-panel
On 02/04/2011 03:38 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
04.02.2011 21:10, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Could we please either have boost.m4 packaged in Fedora, or at least
changes for running with the latest boost in Fedora integrated upstream?
What you are hitting here seems more related to gcc or binutils
On 10/01/2010 03:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Takanori MATSUURA wrote:
For modules/libimg/png, mozilla products use aPNG which was rejected
by upstream.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APNG
So we have to use internal png.
But this is against our packaging guidelines.
There are only 2
On 09/30/2010 05:19 AM, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:37:33PM +0900, Takanori MATSUURA wrote:
If someone implement
--enable-system-libvpx
--enable-system-vorbis
--enable-system-ogg
--enable-system-theora
into the mozilla source, we can easily remove source for the
On 09/12/2010 08:39 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
On 09/12/2010 12:50 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
How did this slip through the cracks? Isn't that a security related
update?
No, it didn't slip trough the cracks. Some problems with the nss 3.12.7
update on which it depends have held up the
On 08/25/2010 03:13 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Christopher Ailloncail...@redhat.com wrote:
I missed the first notice of this go by, but I use zsh so can play with
it in the next few days. Can you post the updates so I don't hit the
same bugs you did?
Sure. Attached. The bugs were mainly with
On 08/24/2010 07:31 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Jesse Keatingjkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/30/10 9:34 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
I'd like to get some wider testing on it than what I subjected it to.
Constructive criticism welcome.
Did you ever
On 04/27/2010 02:55 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I think that, sure, we should try to get patches upstreamed, but I don't see
why we'd need to wait for their approval before applying them, other than
due to the aforementioned trademark bureaucracy.
You really don't see the value in having the
On 04/27/2010 02:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
* libffi is bundled because there's no option to use the system version,
This option doesn't exist because it's impossible to use right now.
Just adding a --with-libffi doesn't actually make it useful since the
minimum required version of libffi
On 04/27/2010 02:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
(In addition, Thunderbird bundles xulrunner, but there's no fix available
for that issue at this time.)
I'm not sure why I'm bothering responding if you're not going to even
read responses, such as:
On 04/29/2010 12:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Christopher Aillon (cail...@redhat.com) said:
This option doesn't exist because it's impossible to use right now.
Just adding a --with-libffi doesn't actually make it useful since the
minimum required version of libffi hasn't been released yet
On 04/23/2010 12:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
To clarify a little further...
The main purpose
43 matches
Mail list logo
