Re: s390x: hanging koji build

On Sat, 11 May 2019 10:41:37 +0200 Felix Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to create a new build borgbackup for rawhide/F30 > (borgbackup is currently broken on F30). > > However it seems like the s390x build just hangs: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34771060 > > The

Re: Maintainer test instances

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:37:55 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: > https://www.openmainframeproject.org/ has some information on getting > access to mainframe resources. there is also some information at > https://osuosl.org/services/ibm-z/ I believe both of them end up > running on hardware at Marist

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers

On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:30:27 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: astyleorphan 0 weeks ago codeblocksorphan, sharkcz 0 weeks ago I'll take over these - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8283 Dan

Re: modular repositories in mock configs: please don't

On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 08:59:35 +0100 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 01. 03. 19 v 0:22 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > > On 01. 03. 19 0:05, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> I don't want or need modules installed for this package to build. > > It may be true if your specific case. But generally this is not true.

Re: Are the s390x builders healthy?

On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:08:24 -0500 Kaleb Keithley wrote: > I'm trying to build Ceph again for f31 after the branching. > > It built before the branching, eight days ago. > > The x86_64[1] part of number two below got further than either of the > two examples below before I killed it. I'm

Re: koji-build fails on s390x architecure

On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:10:41 - "Martin Gansser" wrote: > Hi, > > the koji-build for speed-dreams [1] fails on s390x architecure. > > The root.log show's the following detail: > > DEBUG util.py:492: speed-dreams-1:2.2.2-2.fc30 > DEBUG util.py:490:

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:01:26 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 01. 19 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 31. 01. 19 11:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 31. 01. 19 10:56, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>> Just as a note, what's in the 'rawhide' repo right now differs > >>> quite a lot from what's in the

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:01:26 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 01. 19 11:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 31. 01. 19 11:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 31. 01. 19 10:56, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>> Just as a note, what's in the 'rawhide' repo right now differs > >>> quite a lot from what's in the

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190114.n.0 changes

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:11:52 + Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 2:52 PM Dan Horák wrote: > > > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:54:02 + > > Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > > > > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190108.n.0 > > > NEW: Fedora-R

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190114.n.0 changes

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:54:02 + Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190108.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190114.n.0 > > = SUMMARY = > Added images:3 > Dropped images: 1 > Added packages: 12 > Dropped packages:3 > Upgraded packages: 626 >

Re: Fw: Re: OUTAGE: Koji system 2019-01-11 -> 2019-01-14

unctional deficiencies, so it won't produce the same results as real hw Dan > > пн, 14 янв. 2019 г. в 10:37, Dan Horák : > > > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:52:30 -0500 > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 8:50 PM Neal Gompa &

Re: OUTAGE: Koji system 2019-01-11 -> 2019-01-14

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 08:34:14 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 12. 18 20:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > The facility that houses the Fedora s390 server will have a major > > power outage starting 2019-01-11 22:00 UTC and ending 2019-01-14 > > 22:00 UTC. During this time the s390 builders

Re: Fw: Re: OUTAGE: Koji system 2019-01-11 -> 2019-01-14

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:52:30 -0500 Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 8:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > * Buildbot (Python 3) > > * Jenkins (Java) > > * Vespene (Python 3) > > * GoCD (Java + Ruby) > > * Zuul (Python) > > > > Of the four listed above, only the first two are packaged in

Re: Fw: Re: OUTAGE: Koji system 2019-01-11 -> 2019-01-14

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:05:33 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 12. 01. 19 19:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 1/12/19 5:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 12. 01. 19 14:19, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >>> Dan Horák wrote: > >>>> This is a reminder that thi

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:55:22 +0100 Dan Horák wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:55 +0100 > "J. Scheurich" wrote: > > > > > > I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement, > > > > What can be improvided ? > > The srpm pr

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:55 +0100 "J. Scheurich" wrote: > > > I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement, > > What can be improvided ? > The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures, > all tips of > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481 > > has been

Fw: Re: OUTAGE: Koji system 2019-01-11 -> 2019-01-14

Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:03:57 -0500 From: Stephen John Smoogen To: Fedora Infrastructure , Development discussions related to Fedora , devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: OUTAGE: Koji system 2019-01-11 -> 2019-01-14 This is a reminder that this

Re: Problem with s390 builders?

On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:16:12 + "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31977446 > > This has been sitting with a "free" s390 job for about 4-5 hours. There is an announce outage in the Boston lab that hosts the mainframe, it will last till

Re: debugfs ACL

On Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:36:16 - "Mikhail Gavrilov" wrote: > I found that here blame patch 201 efi-lockdown.patch. > I was build kernel with fedpkg without this patch and problem was > gone. > > # cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/amdgpu_gca_config | xxd -e - > : 0003 0004 0004

Re: Broken el7 ppc64 koji

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:26:39 -0700 Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 12/14/18 7:41 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:29:26 -0500 > > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 08:53, Vascom wrote: > >>> > >>

Re: Broken el7 ppc64 koji

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:29:26 -0500 Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 08:53, Vascom wrote: > > > > But it was here in previous build few months ago. > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/mediainfo/18.08.1/1.el7/data/logs/ppc64/root.log > > OK.. yeah my fault for

Re: svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL

On Fri, 07 Dec 2018 09:53:00 - "Martin Gansser" wrote: > Hi, > > If I want to build glmixer on the rpmfusion build server I get the > following error[1]: the real error seems to be missing BR: chrpath (see the end of the build.log) > -- Generating ChangeLog from SVN (please be

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:02:41 +0100 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:45, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > > On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 > >> Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > >> > >>> W

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > > > Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl > > archs starting in fedora-30/rawhide. > > > The upstream project doesn't support it. The armv7hl

Re: fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug is not getting updates

On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:28:46 +0100 Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Does anybody know why? > > Last kernel available there is 2 weeks old. > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kernel-nodebug/x86_64/ I've already pinged #fedora-kernel few days ago, but let's notify the kernel list too.

Re: Upstream tip wanted: CI service for Big Endian acrhes

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:02:45 -0500 Randy Barlow wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 13:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Recently I've reported some Big Endian related test failures to an > > upstream project [0]. > > > > I was asked by an upstream project maintainer, whether I know some > > free

Re: Upstream tip wanted: CI service for Big Endian acrhes

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:32:57 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: > Recently I've reported some Big Endian related test failures to an > upstream project [0]. > > I was asked by an upstream project maintainer, whether I know some > free Continuous Integration services where they can easily run their >

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:13:42 -0400 Omair Majid wrote: > * Michael Cronenworth [2018-08-15 10:19]: > > On 08/15/2018 08:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > Are you sure about that?  Ocaml does it as well. > > > > The guidelines allow an initial bootstrap from binaries, but > > subsequent builds

Re: build failed on s390x, other archs building okay

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:12:22 -0400 "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" wrote: > Is this a spurious failure or ??? looks like an infrastructure problem with build<->hub communication Dan > ... > Task info: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28564187 ... > buildArch

Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200 Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I try build new version of perdition package. > > > > It build fine > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on > > all

Re: Fedora c++ default build flags

On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:00:40 +0200 mskal...@redhat.com wrote: > Hi, > during a discussion with upstream (MongoDB) they asked me about > default Fedora C/C++ build flags. And I don't remember all Fedora > System Wide changes where it was introduced,... so is there some > place where it's

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Discontinue PPC64 as Alternative Architecture

On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 12:57:41 -0500 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "JK" == Jan Kurik writes: > > JK> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DiscontinuePPC64 > > This may be necessary, but it's sadly unfortunate as (so far as I can > tell) it leaves us with only one big-endian architecture

Re: i686 kernel missing on rawhide / disabling archs in critical path pkgs

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:55:16 -0500 Justin Forbes wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Rex Dieter > wrote: > > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > >> If there's continued silence and i686 kernel doesn't get fixed > >> soon, I'll file ticket with FESCO asking for i686 arch to be > >> removed

Re: GCC 8.0.x caused failure on Blender dependent libraries

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:55:53 - "Luya Tshimbalanga" wrote: > Both upstream from Blender and embree responded and provided the > patches. Blender: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1060683 embree: >

Re: How to waiver no test results found?

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 07:07:40 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > I tried using waiverdb-cli per the wiki and created a waiver for the > rpmlint results because it's all I can see: > > ]$ curl " >

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:22:32 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > > The important ones are the ones defined in the policy that gates > > packages and > > are listed here:

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:57:19 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100 > > Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100 Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote: > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31 +0100 > Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Michael Cronenworth > > <m...@cchtml.com> wrote: > > &g

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:25:31 +0100 Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Michael Cronenworth > wrote: > > On 03/18/2018 01:02 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> > >> I've looked at waiverdb-cli too, but since no tests seem to have > >> run

Re: GCC 8.0.1 updates in F28

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:36:47 -0700 Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 18:26 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:11:49 + > > Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On

Re: GCC 8.0.1 updates in F28

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:11:49 + Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Vascom wrote: > > Hi. > > > > GCC 8.0.1-0.16 in F28 repo is freezed until F28 release? > > Or it will be updated soon so we can build some packages failed to > >

Re: glibc-headers is missing rpc/rpc.h in rawhide

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:30:32 +0100 Jan Synacek wrote: > Did I miss something? The xinetd package cannot be built because of > that. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SunRPCRemoval Dan ___ devel mailing list

Re: Removal of BuildRoot

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:19:54 +0100 Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 5:44:57 PM CET Remi Collet wrote: > > Le 13/02/2018 à 23:05, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : > > > Just a small heads up, ... > > > > As I said on IRC > > > > - waste of time > > - waste of

Re: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures:

On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 12:43:10 - "Martin Gansser" wrote: > Hi, > > when building a new package version of libmicrohttpd for rawhide on > koji, the package build fails with the following error message [1]: > > BuildError: The following noarch package built

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in tinyxml2

On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:57:03 +0100 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 09:34 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 08:21:30AM -, François Cami wrote: > > > > announcement should be made here too > > > > > > + > > > > Rule of

Re: Intent to retire jenkins.fedorainfracloud.org

On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:03:28 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Dear all, > > The Fedora Infrastructure team has had a jenkins instance running at > jenkins.fedorainfracloud.org for a little while now. This instance was > maintained on a best-effort basis though and we often

Re: 'configure' error on x86_64/ppc64 only

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 17:29:37 +0100 Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > 'configure' command of 'mld2p4' package is failing on Rawhide > x86_64/ppc64 only with: > > > checking for working installation of PSBLAS... yes. > > checking for version of PSBLAS... Done > >

Re: Odd message when escalating priveledge with sudo - F27 - LXQt - QTerminal ( Apologies if wrong list )

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:58:35 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:36:33PM -, Zach Villers wrote: > > I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet; > > > > [jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su > >

Re: koji: Get all completed builds since a specific date?

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:27:08 +0200 Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > Is there a way to query koji for all completed builds since a > specific date? "koji list-history --help" should help Dan ___ devel mailing list --

Re: getting kernel-devel added

On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:49:38 -0400 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:35:08AM -0400, Ben Williams wrote: > > case A) Students are using Fedora on windows in a VM (Vbox in this > > case) for a class. they are required for said class to install the > >

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 13:45:42 +0200 David Tardon wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 04:08:55PM +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes > > soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: > > Done.

Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:51:49 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > OCaml 4.05 was added to Fedora 27+ recently. Unfortunately, on > aarch64 only, it interacts badly with a change made in binutils 2.29 > which tightens up the rules on relocations for PC-relative addresses. >

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:54:12 -0500 Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 08/24/2017 10:49 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Epoch bump? Why? The f25/f26 packages never even got to testing... > > Just revert the commits, etc. > > I thought Koji did an NVR check? Won't let a lower version or

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:04:51 +0200 Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 22:16:40 -0500 > Michael Cronenworth <m...@cchtml.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > An ImageMagick update (6.9 => 7.0) with an SONAME bump and other >

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 22:16:40 -0500 Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hi all, > > An ImageMagick update (6.9 => 7.0) with an SONAME bump and other > breakage has been pushed to F25 and higher. > > First, the update introduces regressions on s390x and ppc64 arches. > -

Re: src.fedoraproject.org, forking projects, PRs

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:34:22 - "Wolfgang Stoeggl" wrote: > Hello, > is forking projects, PRs etc. already supposed to work at > src.fedoraproject.org? So far, I am getting the following: > > # Source GIT URL: SSH > git clone

Re: tcp_wrappers deprecation

On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:42:21 +0200 Jakub Jelen wrote: > On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 13:58 +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote: > > Hello Fedora devels and users, > > > > more than three years ago, the same topic started discussion if we > > want > > this package in Fedora or not and how [1].

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:57:28 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dave Love wrote: > > > Kevin Kofler writes: > >> If you are talking about the missing RPM AutoProvides: > >> Provides: libblas.so.3()(64bit) > >> does wonders. > > > > I mean you need to get the soname right and

Re: Build failures on alternative ("secondary") arches

On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 15:34:03 +0200 Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All! > I've got two nasty packages. One fails to pass the tests on BigEndian > arches (s390x, ppc64), another one fails to pass the tests on POWER > (ppc64 and ppc64le). > > So I have several questions. > > *

Re: Build failures on alternative ("secondary") arches

On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:37:47 +0100 Tom Hughes wrote: > On 03/08/17 14:34, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > > > I've got two nasty packages. One fails to pass the tests on > > BigEndian arches (s390x, ppc64), another one fails to pass the > > tests on POWER (ppc64 and ppc64le). > > > >

Re: Rawhide s390x builders hanging in random places

On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:08:06 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote: > It seems that the rawhide s390x builders hang in various different > places, randomly: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=20584916=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 > (stuck at wcsmbs) > >

Re: Emacs build fails in Rawhide on ppc64le

On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:31:23 +0200 Jan Synacek wrote: > I'm trying to build Emacs in Rawhide and this is what I get from the > logs [1]: > > ... > CCLD temacs > /usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/7/../../../../lib64/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so: > undefined reference to

Re: cbang build error on epel

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:17:46 - Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > > Argument 4 is the "n". The problem is with the definition of > > "PRIo64. There was a recent commit attempting to fix that, but it > > probably needs some adjustment to handle your case. Check out

Re: Fedora 27 mass rebuild at risk

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 21:48:46 -0400 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 07/11/2017 12:37 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > If we're lucky we can get everything ready for the 12th, but we > > might need another day or two given how long it takes to build gcc > > on all the arches. > > We

Re: Tool for generating a rootfs for foreign arch (aarch64 on x86_64, for example)?

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:33:25 -0400 Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:29 AM, John Reiser > wrote: > > On 06/22/2017 0013Z, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> > >> Yes, we do have debootstrap, but it can only build Debian-based > >> systems. :) > >> > >>

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Golang 1.9

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:17:33 -0400 (EDT) Jakub Cajka wrote: > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Tony Breeds" > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:03:44 AM > > Subject: Re: F27 System Wide Change:

Re: How to make a package multilib

On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:22:33 +0200 Tomas Mraz wrote: > Hi all, > > the package p11-kit-trust needs to be multilib because it contains > PKCS#11 .so object used for access to trusted CA certificate store. > However because this package is a PKCS#11 module and not a regular >

Re: mame build OOMs on f24 and f25 i686, succeeds on other arches and branches

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 06:42:21 +0200 Julian Sikorski wrote: > Hi list, > > I have updated mame packages to 0.186 yesterday. The package built > fine on rawhide [1] and f26 [2], as well as on non-i686 on f25 and > f24. On f25 [3] and f24 [4] i686, the build has failed with the >

Re: armv7hl: ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Memory exhausted

On Fri, 12 May 2017 12:13:33 +0200 Marek Skalický wrote: > Hi, > I am building mongodb and on armv7hl I got "/bin/ld: failed to set > dynamic section sizes: Memory exhausted" error. > > How to solve this? I would prefer more general solution that forcing > to -j1 and hope

Re: build tests failure on non x86_64 archs

On Thu, 11 May 2017 15:51:17 +0200 Gianluca Sforna wrote: > While trying to update one of my packages (rdkit), I am hitting an > issue with its tests suite, so apparently every non-x86_64 build is > failing. > > rawhide example: >

Re: s390x builders down?

On Wed, 10 May 2017 13:24:15 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > or is the lack of being "ready" because they're all in use? this is correct, all are in use by other tasks Dan > I've never had all other arches complete on a build before one > starts... > >

Re: xorg-x11-drv-dummy for s390x?

On Tue, 2 May 2017 21:47:45 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > I make fairly extensive use or xorg-x11-drv-dummy for running > graphical tests in koji builds. I see that xorg-x11-drv-dummy is not > built for s390x, probably due to xorg-x11-server-devel not being > available on

Re: Alternative Arch update

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:34:33 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi All, > > Just letting you all know that as part of the redefinition of > Alternative Architectures[1] we have just enabled the building of > s390x in primary koji. this is the last new architecture we are > planning

Re: Killing koji buildjobs

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:33:11 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to kill hanging koji-buildjobs? > > These 2 build jobs (launched by me) seem to be hanging and don't seem > to be wanting to finish (or fail) for 3 days (for reasons unknown to > me): > > -

Re: ARM and AArch64 GCC 7.1 ABI change

forwarding to the ARM list for better visibility by the ARM team Dan On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:55:47 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El mar, 25-04-2017 a las 17:52 +0200, Jakub Jelinek escribió: > > Hi! > > > > A severe ABI bug on AArch64 and especially on ARM

Re: Review swap

On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:53:43 +0100 James Hogarth wrote: > HI all, > > Is anyone looking for a review swap? > > I've just submitted lldpd and would be happy to carry out a review in > return: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438853 taken, mine is

Re: Qt 5.8 coming to rawhide

On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:04:36 -0500 Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > Mostly fyi/heads-up, > > > > kde-sig members imported Qt 5.8 into git over the weekend (kudos to > > heliocastro for initial packaging/copr and kkofler for merging > > import), and > >

Re: automated packaging

On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:10:47 + (UTC) Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-03-23, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 06:32 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > >> That's not true, there are ABI checks in the sidebar on koji. > > > > Sorry, in the

Re: per-arch tasks strategy in Taskotron

On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:44:54 -0400 (EDT) Kamil Paral wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I want to consult our current strategy regarding per-arch tasks. We > > currently have no such tasks, all of them are generic (they can run > > on any host system and test any single or multiple

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide and 26): ldns (libldns.so.1 -> libldns.so.2)

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 06:35:17 -0400 Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 15:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > ldns was updated from 1.6.17 to 1.7.0 for Rawhide and Fedora 26 on > > 2017-03-06. This update bumped the soname from libldns.so.1 to > > libldns.so.2 . This

Re: [Help Wanted] PPC64LE build for thrift

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:10:32 + Christopher wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build the latest version of thrift, and am running into > a problem with one of the build tests, which has a dependency on > boost-static for "%{_libdir}/libboost_unit_test_framework.a" >

js-1.8.5 updated

Hi, I've updated the js package with a fix for the 48-bit VA change [1] from Jeremy Linton. Lack of the fix broke some other builds during the mass rebuild that were running for example "xsltproc | elinks" for generating their docs (eg. pam [2]). So the new js builds are done for Rawhide and F-26

nodejs-* packages not honouring %nodejs_arches

Hi, there seems to be a small number of nodejs-* packages that use a hard-coded ExclusiveArch value instead of the %nodejs_arches macro or they weren't rebuilt during the mass-rebuild. nodejs-ansicolors nodejs-ansistyles nodejs-bson nodejs-content-type nodejs-defence nodejs-grunt-contrib-connect

Re: policy on changes in or introduction of new dependencies

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:15:32 + "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:53:01PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' > Mierzejewski wrote: > > Dear Fedora developers, > > there have been a number of examples where an update in a stable > > branch brought in new

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:56:44 +0100 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/21/2017 01:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:14:56 + > > "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" wrote: > > ...snip... > > > >> > >> Rawhide as it currently exists can't stay solid

Re: In need of C++ gurus

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:15:46 +0100 Jan Synacek wrote: > Hi, > > warzone2100 fails to build [1] and I have no idea how to fix that. > Most of the errors are: it's a known problem on ppc64le, please search this lists archive, it was discussed recently (switching from

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:48:27 +0100 (CET) "Francisco J. Tsao Santin" <t...@gpul.org> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Dan Horák wrote: > > > it could be a gcc7 bug on 32-bit arches, you can check by switching > > to -O1 or -O0 instead of the default -O2, or

Re: BuildRequire debuginfo for debugging?

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:30:44 +0100 Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to gather a good stacktrace of a qbs crash on > aarch64/ppc64/ppc64le and I managed to collect something by prepending > > gdb -batch -ex "run" -ex "bt full" --args > > to the qbs calls. So far so

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:39:00 +0100 (CET) "Francisco J. Tsao Santin" wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a problem with the hardlink package. The koji build made by > Fedora Release Engineering failed in armv7hl and i686 architectures. > I saw the logs and I tried a mock build in my own

Re: Fedora PSM2 build failures

On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:04:50 +0100 Jan Kurik wrote: > Hi Aravind, > > there was an upgrade of GCC to version 7 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC7 . As I can not turn the > options off by my self, I am resending this to Release Engineering > mailing list to consider

Re: Koji build - unexpected keyword argument 'canfail'

On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:05:01 +0100 Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:12:18 -0700 > Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:49:18 -0500 (EST) > > Charalampos Stratakis <cstra...@redhat.com> wrote: > >

Re: Koji build - unexpected keyword argument 'canfail'

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:12:18 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:49:18 -0500 (EST) > Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > > Getting the same issue for gcc-python-plugin [0]. The scratch build > > in koji (from my local srpm) completed

Re: overriding CXX_FLAGS

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:06:14 +0100 Mattia Verga wrote: > In the latest version of RawTherapee, developers suggest the use of > -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-std=c++11". > > I've tried to modify the .spec file with > -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -std=c++11" [1], but koji

Re: Fedora Elections January 2017 - Voting period is in progress

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:27:31 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 12.1.2017 v 20:48 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > > [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/council-january-2017 > > [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/famsco-jauary-2017 > > [3]

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support

On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:42:25 + Tom Hughes wrote: > On 05/01/17 16:38, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Lo! On 05.01.2017 17:03, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> [...] > >> ## Advantages > >> > >> * Simplification of build-tree creation. We wouldn't have to > >> maintain the lists

Re: Koji builders' specs

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 13:58:38 +0100 Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 12:06:40 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Monday, January 2, 2017 3:47:52 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > On Monday, January 2, 2017 2:40:34 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > Also,

Re: Koji builders' specs

On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:03:49 +0100 Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hi all, > > where is documented what system/hw is used on (primary) Koji builders? > I'm interested in memory, storage, filesystem, host operating system, > guest operating system (if those are VMs), etc. > > The

Re: Support for older kernels

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:19:06 +0100 Florian Weimer wrote: > Do we need to support running current Fedora releases in kernels > which are older than the initial Fedora kernel for that release? AFAIK we do, because the build-system hosts are a bit behind, they are still F-24

Re: rawhide: Illegal char '-' (0x2d) in: Release: 3.fc26-pending

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:00:06 +0100 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Any idea on why this happens when attempting to build in rawhide? Is > the buildroot broken? > > $ fedpkg build > error: line 6: Illegal char '-' (0x2d) in: Release: 3.fc26-pending > error: query of specfile

Re: Packages up for grabs

On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:33:33 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 10:22 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > In the spirit of the season I'm giving away packages :) > > > > I am not using most of these anymore, so I'd like to send them off > > to a good

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >