Should be Fedora 21 $PRODUCT because the Fedora version is underneath
the product, and one product can usually convert into another on an
installed system.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Like this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959071
I specifically followed up to say the issue continues in Fedora 19,
and nothing changed. The bug tracker should not expire bugs if there's
been a comment after the EOL warning.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Susi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
You just need to change the Version tag.
That is not something I appear to have access to do. And, if I don't,
very few people do.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Quite a lot of people have editbugs - I think it's in the hundreds or
thousands
I mean few people in the sense that it requires a specific grant of
permissions, more than to just report bugs.
Telling me to join a group
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:39 PM, David Timothy Strauss
da...@davidstrauss.net wrote:
Telling me to join a group is also not addressing my complaint. My
complaint is that Fedora is auto-setting EOL on bugs with no clear way
for even the users who reported the bugs to stop it from happening
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
The idea of not closing bugs that have comments after the EOL
notification doesn't necessarily make things better, I don't think; we'd
just have errors in the other direction. Say someone dropped a note 'oh
yeah, this
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
TBH I thought the whole point was that the reporter was expected to update
the version if they wanted it to stay open so I'm a bit surprised to hear
that they can't unless they are also a packager.
Regular bug reporters
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Sure it does - it tells them to update the version if the problem still
occurs.
Those instructions start with Package Maintainer: so they are not
directed at the people experiencing the bug.
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 15:04 -0800, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
TBH I thought the whole point was that the reporter was expected to update
the version
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
Everyone does not need reopen: just the ability to change the version
would suffice. (Unless there are serious worries about the risk of
allowing users to deface version fields?) I think auto-expiration would
work
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Mauricio Tavares raubvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Fedora:
o bleeding edge, where new stuff comes
Cutting edge. Let's not ride the metaphor overly far [1]. We do
actually test a fair bit before releasing Fedora or package updates.
[1]
11 matches
Mail list logo
