Re: Orphaning The Mana World (tmw and tmw-music)

2016-02-12 Thread Erik Schilling
Hi, As far as I know, manaplus and tmw refer to the same project. The latter is just the upstream name of the source archives. So according to the naming guidelines, tmw is a valid package name but I guess, it would also be fine to rename it to manaplus as it's more descriptive. Concerning

Re: Orphaning The Mana World (tmw and tmw-music)

2016-01-12 Thread Erik Schilling
On Jan 11, 2016 22:23, "Martin Gieseking" <martin.giesek...@uos.de> wrote: > > Am 11.01.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Erik Schilling: > > After a short discussion with upstream they told me that they ship the > > branding for tmw inside of the manaplus sources. So it

Re: Orphaning The Mana World (tmw and tmw-music)

2016-01-11 Thread Erik Schilling
On Jan 8, 2016 11:44, "Martin Gieseking" wrote: > > Hi, > > unfortunately, I have to orphan the two Mana World packages tmw [1] and tmw-music [2] since I don't use them any longer and don't have enough time to maintain them properly. It would be great if somebody is still

Re: Orphaning The Mana World (tmw and tmw-music)

2016-01-11 Thread Erik Schilling
I will talk with upstream whether the current way the package is provided is still up to date (iirc manaplus ships some branding too...). Maybe I will pick the package then... After a short discussion with upstream they told me that they ship the branding for tmw inside of the manaplus

Re: Enable tapping by default

2014-11-18 Thread Erik Schilling
On 18 Nov 2014 05:56, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:16:26AM +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: On 11/18/2014 12:12 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:27:53PM +0300, Mustafa Muhammad wrote: Hi, I am testing Fedora 21 beta and -like

Re: Enable tapping by default

2014-11-18 Thread Erik Schilling
On 18/11/14 22:02, Kevin Kofler wrote: Erik Schilling wrote: Over the time I just got used to hitting the special button... And that's what that special button is for. :-) If the touchpad has physical buttons (or physically-drawn virtual buttons), why do users even expect tapping

Re: Qt 5 Fedora 21 packages

2014-10-17 Thread Erik Schilling
On 16/10/14 16:27, Kevin Kofler wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: Some confusion here trying to use Fedora's Qt 5 packages, and it seems they cannot be use quickly. Depends on the build system you (or the upstream project you're packaging) use: * CMake: just works * qmake: call qmake-qt5

Re: Multiple different licenses for metadata_license/ tag in a appdata file

2014-08-26 Thread Erik Schilling
On 26/08/14 10:42, Richard Hughes wrote: On 25 August 2014 20:09, Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@gmail.com wrote: I am being on rawhide here. Is there anything I am doing wrong? Rawhide might not be new enough; have you got libappstream-glib = 0.2.5 installed? No. My Docker rawhide has

Re: Multiple different licenses for metadata_license/ tag in a appdata file

2014-08-25 Thread Erik Schilling
Hi, On 10/08/14 20:10, Richard Hughes wrote: On 10 August 2014 15:14, Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@gmail.com wrote: I want to include multiple different licenses in the said tag since the screenshots show art of different sources/licenses. How can I do that? Just use the usual

Re: Multiple different licenses for metadata_license/ tag in a appdata file

2014-08-11 Thread Erik Schilling
On 10/08/14 20:10, Richard Hughes wrote: On 10 August 2014 15:14, Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@gmail.com wrote: I want to include multiple different licenses in the said tag since the screenshots show art of different sources/licenses. How can I do that? Just use the usual

Re: Multiple different licenses for metadata_license/ tag in a appdata file

2014-08-11 Thread Erik Schilling
On 11/08/14 20:11, Richard Hughes wrote: On 11 August 2014 17:09, Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@gmail.com wrote: Hm... I use metadata_licenseCC-BY-3.0 and GPL-2.0/metadata_license but `appdata-validate` tells me: • tag-invalid : metadata_license is not valid Okay, so GPL-2.0

Re: Multiple different licenses for metadata_license/ tag in a appdata file

2014-08-11 Thread Erik Schilling
On 11/08/14 21:25, Richard Hughes wrote: On 11 August 2014 20:18, Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@gmail.com wrote: Is it recommended to run the validator in the specfile otherwise? Are there any guidelines for this already? Yes, it's all ready to do into the packaging guidelines: https

Multiple different licenses for metadata_license/ tag in a appdata file

2014-08-10 Thread Erik Schilling
Hello, I want to include multiple different licenses in the said tag since the screenshots show art of different sources/licenses. How can I do that? Trying , or and seperation makes the `appdata-validate` tool fail. Regards, Erik -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-10 Thread Erik Schilling
On 08/07/2013 04:38 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: I don't understand why manaplus was orphaned just after 8 months it got into Fedora. If you can't keep it, don't package it. Hello, I was the maintainer of manaplus and the one who brought it into Fedora. Back then manaplus was supposed to

Orphaning manaplus

2013-08-03 Thread Erik Schilling
Hello, I orphaned manaplus. A MMORPG client for The Mana World / Evol. It has a really rapid release schema and I am already a couple of versions behind... Regards, Erik -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of