On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:02:09AM -0500, Sam Kottler wrote:
Will you do a 2.7 for EPEL5 as well?
That's the plan. I pushed EPEL6 first since I figured more people would
be running masters on the newer distro and masters need to be on newer
versions than agents.
I'd expect the
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:53:46AM -0500, Sam Kottler wrote:
Hi!
Puppet 2.7 is waiting to get pushed to stable and I just wanted to give
people a heads up about the upgrade procedure. Please ensure that your
master(s) get upgraded before your agents. I'd recommend following this [1]
I'm using sogo on RHEL6 at work, and would gladly help maintaining it
for Fedora. But, I've been expecting this would be a difficult job
because I thought SOGo/inverse maintained their own patched gnustep,
sope or something like that. Is that not the case?
For RHEL6 we're using sope 4.9 from
/
and SOPE from http://sope.opengroupware.org/ ? Which one should Fedora
provide?
Ref:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/190217.html
for start of thread.
-jf
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:22:41PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 16.10.2013 18:13, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
I'm
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:22:57AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
gpgv --homedir /tmp --keyring %{SOURCE2} --status-fd=1 %{SOURCE1}
%{SOURCE0} | grep -q '^\[GNUPG:\] GOODSIG'
snip
That one-liner is pretty much all that's required for valid gpg verification.
Hope this helps.
Yes it
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:07:29AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 08/24/2013 11:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901
looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining
which does not support EECDHE which is a shame these
days in context of
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:57:15PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Not Found
The requested URL /roller/blog/entry/enable_elliptical_curve_diffie_hellman
was not found on this server.
http://www.theverge.com/2013/6/26/4468050/facebook-follows-google-with-tough-encryption-standard
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:17:00AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
The way this worked in the past (and still does on RHEL and some other
distros) is that MySQL AB provided RPMs named MySQL, MySQL-server,
etc, which simply conflicted with the Red Hat-supplied packages named
mysql, mysql-server, etc.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm curious - why would you need to do this? Seems somewhat fragile to
be doing automatically on upgrade.
I want to make the upgrade between apache traffic server v3.0 and 3.2
as smooth as possible. There were a couple
I have an rpm package where I need to stop the running service, remove
some files and start the service again depending on which package
version was already installed. I assume I need to do this in %postun,
where we normally do condrestart, but I don't know how to check the
version of the
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
Puppet in the Fedora/EPEL ecosystem is a bit wonky currently.
I'd really like to fix it.
Problems:
* Fedora 17 (and higher) ships with Ruby 1.9.x and Puppet 2.7.x. 2.7.x is not
100% compatible with 1.9.3. The
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 20:56:24 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
Will it be OK to do this upgrade in F15/F16/F17, or are we stuck on v3.0 ?
I'm not a user of this particular apache service, but in general I would vote
-1
I would like to upgrade Apache Traffic Server (ATS) from v3.0.x to new
stable branch v3.2.x. The 3.2 branch has lots of improvements for IPv6
and SSL that are important to me, and also fixes a crash I've been
hitting in v3.0. But, unfortunately there are a couple of incompatible
config file
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:39:07PM +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
It consists of 8 packages, and there are two more (seivot, for
benchmarking, and summain, for generating diff-able file
manifests) that I have not packaged yet, all eight are in Bugzilla,
in descending order
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:15:38AM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
* If a git commit is tagged in a specific way, omit from rpm changelog.
What I mean by tagged is a git tag, in form of let's say
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 07:47:25AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Because we are trying to protect the logged in user, where we currently do not
confine that many domains, and even if you are using confined users we do not
prevent a confined user process from ptrace on another user process,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:35:09AM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
I would like for a review swap for the following packages. They are
sugar activities.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795069
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700
I'll have a go :-)
Could you
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:06:36AM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
There is - however - one option I am missing: Some form of combined
static and dynamic configuration.
IE. I want the server to obtain an IPv6-address dynamically, but i ALSO
want it to have one (or more) static IP-address(es) in
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:43:10PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
So you say that both
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=2001:840:0:11::30/64
Shoudl work?
(Have not tested yet, but might do that later today).
I believe
IPV6INIT=yes
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:37:10PM +0200, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737401
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722709
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710648
I did a couple of reviews lately, but I would swap.
I've never done a
Could someone please help review the Apache Traffic Server:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683463
I believe it should be more or less complete as far as I see it,
but the current reviewer doesn't have time to complete it so it's
been stalled for months now..
-jf
--
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:20:51AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Just out of curiosity I'am assuming this contains a daemon and if so has
it been converted to native systemd service files?
Yes it contains a daemon, but no, I haven't created the systemd service
files yet. I intended to
We're trying to package Apache Traffic Server for fedora, and need a
dedicated uid/gid for user/group ats running this services since it
includes clustering and config management over more than one node.
I've found the PackageUserRegistry wiki page at:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
You are misreading the PackageUserRegistry page. Or more likely, you haven't
read it carefully enough to follow the link in the first sentence. RHEL
doesn't use the 'fedora-usermgmt' feature. Not even Fedora uses it everywhere.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:09:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I have always filed a BZ against the 'setup' RPM asking for a
static uid/gid pair to be allocated, and the changelogs support
this approach:
Great, thanks!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715266
-jf
--
Summary of changes:
09188de... fix br, license (*)
421be62... Fixed BR (*)
183bdce... new perl (*)
6783404... upstream released new version (*)
3b3a5a6... - Re-add the nil patch (*)
56cd550... Clean up the unused patches (*)
30f6f75... - New upstream release - Enable tests - Include
commit 828ccc8a3a2c51f3018f029e6943f38434778781
Merge: df4968d 59b5269
Author: Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net
Date: Thu May 19 12:26:35 2011 +0200
Merge branch 'f14' into el5
Conflicts:
.gitignore
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec
sources
.gitignore
commit 6ab40d14516473d00a6966785411444c7ed88106
Author: Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net
Date: Thu May 19 12:34:34 2011 +0200
Missing buildroot.
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SOAP-Lite.spec b/perl-SOAP
commit 366067a4a1a5ec30bbe005af5044f748210bb77a
Merge: 8f85069 b4f33d3
Author: Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net
Date: Mon Mar 28 23:52:44 2011 +0200
Merge branch 'f14' into el6
amavisd-new-2.6.4-stdout.patch | 21 +
amavisd-new.spec |7
29 matches
Mail list logo
