Fedora CoreOS rebasing to Fedora Linux 40

2024-04-23 Thread Jonathan Lebon
Fedora Linux 40 was released today[1]. The Fedora CoreOS `testing` stream has been rebased and is currently rolling out. In two weeks, it will be promoted to the `stable` stream. For more information about Fedora 40, see the Fedora Project’s list of official Changes[2] and the Fedora CoreOS

Re: Current status of OSTree and its handling RPM scriptlets?

2024-02-13 Thread Jonathan Lebon
Hi Zdenek, On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 4:58 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > Hi all, > > there was an issue (either due a bug or due design) in the past about > RPM OSTree treating %post scriptlets in SPEC file differently than on > Fedora Linux - IIUC the explanation was %post scriptlets were applied on

Fedora CoreOS Community Meeting Minutes 2024-01-17

2024-01-17 Thread Jonathan Lebon
Text Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-01-17/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-01-17-16.29.log.txt HTML Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-01-17/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-01-17-16.29.log.html Text Minutes:

Fedora CoreOS next stream rebased to Fedora Linux 39

2023-09-19 Thread Jonathan Lebon
Fedora Linux 39 Beta was released today [1]. Our Fedora CoreOS `next` stream has been migrated to Fedora Linux 39 content. Existing nodes on the `next` stream will update as normal over the following days. The Fedora Project accepted changes for Fedora 39 are at [2] and the Fedora CoreOS analysis

Re: [HEADS UP] util-linux based on new mount API coming to rawhide/f39

2023-04-11 Thread Jonathan Lebon
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:05 PM Colin Walters wrote: > Looks like this broke our mounting of zram: > > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1462 To follow up on this, I filed https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2161 upstream with the requested logs.

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-03-01

2023-03-01 Thread Jonathan Lebon
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-03-01/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-03-01-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-03-01/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-03-01-16.30.txt Log:

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-01-18

2023-01-18 Thread Jonathan Lebon
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-01-18/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-01-18-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-01-18/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-01-18-16.30.txt Log:

Re: F38 proposal: Ostree Native Container (Phase 2, stable) (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-11-21 Thread Jonathan Lebon
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:43 PM Colin Walters wrote: > - This proposal is explicitly trying to tie everything together. I think > without the "bigger picture", it's actually *more* confusing. For example, > just pushing the container images does little unless we invest in them as a >

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2022-04-13

2022-04-13 Thread Jonathan Lebon
Minutes: https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora_coreos_meeting/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-04-13-16.31.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora_coreos_meeting/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-04-13-16.31.txt Log:

Fedora CoreOS moving to podman v4

2022-03-01 Thread Jonathan Lebon
is targeted for 2022-04-19 - the `stable` stream will follow `testing` as usual Thanks, Jonathan Lebon, for the Fedora CoreOS team [1] https://podman.io/releases/2022/02/22/podman-release-v4.0.0.html [2] https://github.com/containers/podman/releases/tag/v4.0.0 [3] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

2022-01-05 Thread Jonathan Lebon
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:46 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > That is not Ignition configuring the network, that is *you* knowing > what an NM file looks like and dropping it in. With cloud-init, it > knows how to access cloud provider data sources to get configuration > information and translate it into

Re: Fedora CoreOS branched stream

2021-03-11 Thread Jonathan Lebon
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:54 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:45 PM Jonathan Lebon wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > This was mentioned in an email on the coreos list[1], but wanted to > > raise visibility on this. > > > > I

Fedora CoreOS branched stream

2021-03-11 Thread Jonathan Lebon
Hi all, This was mentioned in an email on the coreos list[1], but wanted to raise visibility on this. In addition to the rawhide FCOS stream previously discussed[2], we now have a branched stream which tracks "Fedora CoreOS 34" (in quotes because this doesn't mean the same thing as "Fedora 34").

Fedora CoreOS rawhide stream

2020-12-21 Thread Jonathan Lebon
We've recently started a rawhide "mechanical" stream of Fedora CoreOS (mechanical streams are streams that are meant for developers and that don't use RPM lockfiles). You can see the first build here: https://builds.coreos.fedoraproject.org/browser?stream=rawhide This will allow us to more

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Make Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change)

2020-12-02 Thread Jonathan Lebon
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:31 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > This is a fair point. I've personally been very annoyed about how > little Fedora CoreOS integrates with the rest of the Fedora Project. > One very broken consequence of Fedora CoreOS working this way is that > they basically *don't* participate

Re: Changelog between OS states (ie: VMs)

2018-01-08 Thread Jonathan Lebon
- Original Message - > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Jonathan Lebon <jle...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Interestingly, these are both things that Atomic Host make > > easier to query. > > > > E.g. if both VMs are on AH but sitting on different commits, &

Re: Changelog between OS states (ie: VMs)

2018-01-08 Thread Jonathan Lebon
- Original Message - > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > I fully agree wrt configuration changes. I am scoping my interest > exclusively to rpms. > > A bit like saying "I run yum/dnf update on an OS, what bugfixes are > landing/have landed?"

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Jonathan Lebon
> I'm surprised to hear about Fedora working on the Pi Zero, since > that's an ARMv6 computer. Are we bringing ARMv6 into the fold along > with our ARMv7 and AArch64 support? It'd be pretty cool if we did, > since that would enable support for a very wide range of ARM > computers... During his

Self Introduction: Jonathan Lebon

2016-01-11 Thread Jonathan Lebon
Hello everyone, I've been a Fedora user and developer for a few years now. I used to work on the awesome SystemTap tool[1] and now work on (the equally awesome) Project Atomic[2]. My current endeavor is to make it easier for folks of all skill levels to try out the Fedora Atomic image without