Fedora Linux 40 was released today[1]. The Fedora CoreOS `testing`
stream has been rebased and is currently rolling out. In two weeks, it
will be promoted to the `stable` stream.
For more information about Fedora 40, see the Fedora Project’s list of
official Changes[2] and the Fedora CoreOS
Hi Zdenek,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 4:58 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> there was an issue (either due a bug or due design) in the past about
> RPM OSTree treating %post scriptlets in SPEC file differently than on
> Fedora Linux - IIUC the explanation was %post scriptlets were applied on
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-01-17/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-01-17-16.29.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-01-17/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-01-17-16.29.log.html
Text Minutes:
Fedora Linux 39 Beta was released today [1]. Our Fedora CoreOS `next` stream
has been migrated to Fedora Linux 39 content. Existing nodes on the `next`
stream will update as normal over the following days.
The Fedora Project accepted changes for Fedora 39 are at [2] and the Fedora
CoreOS analysis
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:05 PM Colin Walters wrote:
> Looks like this broke our mounting of zram:
>
> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1462
To follow up on this, I filed
https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2161 upstream with the
requested logs.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-03-01/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-03-01-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-03-01/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-03-01-16.30.txt
Log:
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-01-18/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-01-18-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-01-18/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-01-18-16.30.txt
Log:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:43 PM Colin Walters wrote:
> - This proposal is explicitly trying to tie everything together. I think
> without the "bigger picture", it's actually *more* confusing. For example,
> just pushing the container images does little unless we invest in them as a
>
Minutes:
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora_coreos_meeting/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-04-13-16.31.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora_coreos_meeting/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-04-13-16.31.txt
Log:
is targeted for 2022-04-19
- the `stable` stream will follow `testing` as usual
Thanks,
Jonathan Lebon, for the Fedora CoreOS team
[1] https://podman.io/releases/2022/02/22/podman-release-v4.0.0.html
[2] https://github.com/containers/podman/releases/tag/v4.0.0
[3]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:46 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> That is not Ignition configuring the network, that is *you* knowing
> what an NM file looks like and dropping it in. With cloud-init, it
> knows how to access cloud provider data sources to get configuration
> information and translate it into
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:54 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:45 PM Jonathan Lebon wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This was mentioned in an email on the coreos list[1], but wanted to
> > raise visibility on this.
> >
> > I
Hi all,
This was mentioned in an email on the coreos list[1], but wanted to
raise visibility on this.
In addition to the rawhide FCOS stream previously discussed[2], we now
have a branched stream which tracks "Fedora CoreOS 34" (in quotes
because this doesn't mean the same thing as "Fedora 34").
We've recently started a rawhide "mechanical" stream of Fedora CoreOS
(mechanical streams are streams that are meant for developers and that
don't use RPM lockfiles). You can see the first build here:
https://builds.coreos.fedoraproject.org/browser?stream=rawhide
This will allow us to more
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:31 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> This is a fair point. I've personally been very annoyed about how
> little Fedora CoreOS integrates with the rest of the Fedora Project.
> One very broken consequence of Fedora CoreOS working this way is that
> they basically *don't* participate
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Jonathan Lebon <jle...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Interestingly, these are both things that Atomic Host make
> > easier to query.
> >
> > E.g. if both VMs are on AH but sitting on different commits,
&
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> I fully agree wrt configuration changes. I am scoping my interest
> exclusively to rpms.
>
> A bit like saying "I run yum/dnf update on an OS, what bugfixes are
> landing/have landed?"
> I'm surprised to hear about Fedora working on the Pi Zero, since
> that's an ARMv6 computer. Are we bringing ARMv6 into the fold along
> with our ARMv7 and AArch64 support? It'd be pretty cool if we did,
> since that would enable support for a very wide range of ARM
> computers...
During his
Hello everyone,
I've been a Fedora user and developer for a few years now. I
used to work on the awesome SystemTap tool[1] and now work on
(the equally awesome) Project Atomic[2].
My current endeavor is to make it easier for folks of all skill
levels to try out the Fedora Atomic image without
19 matches
Mail list logo