Am 17.04.24 um 23:34 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel:
And in my view, the fact that, in those implementations, there is no
Treacherous Computing hardware preventing me from doing what I want with my
own private key (e.g., just copying the same key to all my devices, as I can
also do with TOTP) is
Am 08.04.24 um 14:55 schrieb Emmanuel Seyman:
Well, you and Kevin see "salami tactics" (whatever that may be),
FTR, I have no idea what "salami tactics" is.
Since apperently multiple people don't know the term:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salami_slicing_tactics
Regards
Kilian
--
Am 04.04.24 um 03:00 schrieb Gordon Messmer:
I think this gets to the heart of the issue. If we set aside subjective
arguments about which desktop is better or more popular, only one of
these desktops allows Fedora to publish a stable operating system which
is a coherent whole, because only one
Am 04.04.24 um 01:46 schrieb Sam Varshavchik:
This is not going to happen.
There's going to be someone else, sitting next to them, who will be
teaching the new user how to use a computer. And that someone will
/also/ be familiar with traditional desktop concepts and paradigms.
They, like the
Am 04.04.24 um 01:03 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel:
You make a good point there. The thing is, GNOME tries really hard to design
for new users, whom they define as a user who has never before used a
computer. Such users are basically on the edge of extinction. A paradigm
that works great for
Am 03.04.24 um 01:48 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:06:45PM -0400, Steve Cossette wrote:
Alright, so a substantial amount of information changed since the original
submission of the change proposal. We aren't necessarily thinking of
demoting Gnome. The overall spirit of the CP
Am 02.04.24 um 10:22 schrieb Florian Weimer:
- Can some wrappers be developed to make it both easier and safer?
GCC already provides function multi-versioning/target clones as a
higher-level interface.
Also, upstreams should by default properly mark their stuffs with
restrictive
Am 31.03.24 um 23:02 schrieb Scott Schmit:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 04:09:36PM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote:
On 3/31/24 2:12 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
But the fact is:
What WOULD have stopped this attack: (one or more of:)
* Deleting ALL unit tests in %prep (and then of course not trying
Am 31.03.24 um 21:19 schrieb Simon de Vlieger:
I don't quite agree with you. Two factor authentication whether an actual second
factor device or not does prevent credential stuffing which is a common attack
method that is easy to perform. It is when people take databases of previously
leaked
Am 30.03.24 um 20:11 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel:
Or better: Do not execute tests to begin with! rm -rf test in %prep and
NEVER run tests during builds. Even when the tests are all legitimate, all
it does is slow down the build (e.g., compare glibc build times without and
with tests) and
Am 30.03.24 um 15:44 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
Meson outclasses CMake in functionality, clarity, and brevity.
I doesn't make sense to consider switching to CMake at this point.
While I do agree on clarity and brevity, I don't on functionality.
Meson doesn't allow you do create your
Am 10.02.24 um 09:47 schrieb Neal Gompa:
Technically, turning off display sync completely is quite difficult
right now since the actual driver stack in Linux underneath everything
(both Wayland and X11) uses implicit sync right now (Linux kernel
drivers, Mesa drivers, etc.).
Interesting
Am 09.02.24 um 18:28 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 12:16 PM Roy Bekken wrote:
On fredag 9. februar 2024 17:41:33 CET Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:06 AM Roy Bekken wrote:
On fredag 9. februar 2024 04:04:04 CET Steve Cossette wrote:
I am not gonna reply to
Am 01.02.24 um 17:44 schrieb Neal Gompa:
That is not necessarily true. For your example about window placement,
there is
this:https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/264
Am 01.02.24 um 17:46 schrieb Neal Gompa:
Sorry, I meant to point to this as well:
14 matches
Mail list logo
