WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (14:00 London, 15:00 Brno, 9:00 Boston,
22:00 Tokyo) in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
= Topic =
* how hhorak's idea about summary from each WG worked
* epel/epic proposal - chat with smoodge
* OpenFloor
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Env and Stacks Working Group has noble plan to make development in
Fedora easier and also work with new technologies, which are not in
Fedora yet.
The whole statement can be found here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Requirements_Document
There is missing Atomic and/or
There's not much to discuss. I'd like to cancel tomorrow's meeting.
Marcela
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2014-05-20)
==
Meeting started by mmaslano at 15:03:40 UTC. The full logs are available
at
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2013-11-05)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 16:02:38 UTC. The full logs are available
at
My apologies for the last minute agenda. We'll be holding our initial
WG meeting today at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode. We'll
cover the various items below. I will try and keep the meeting under
1 hour.
== Logistics ==
- communication channels
- mailing list(s) - env-and-stacks
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-10-09)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:01:03 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-10-09/fesco.2013-10-09-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 19:00 CET) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #986 F19 Feature:
- Original Message -
From: Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, yum-ow...@fedoraproject.org,
yum-cron-ow...@fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:47:19 PM
Subject: Re: rawhide report:
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:32:35 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
On 11/28/2012 08:08 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
this proposal was recently
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:21:01 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:08:59PM +0100,
- Original Message -
From: Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:50:48 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:56:04PM -0600,
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-11-14)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-11-14/fesco.2012-11-14-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= New business =
#topic #911 F18 Feature: Samba 4.0 -
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-07-30)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 17:00:27 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-07-30/fesco.2012-07-30-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
- Original Message -
From: Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:35:19 AM
Subject: Re: redhat-rpm-config and rpm-build (fwd)
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:03:59 +0200, Jens
- Original Message -
From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:57:24 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
On 11/22/2011 09:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/22/2011
- Original Message -
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
To: Fedora perl development team perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 4:41:37 PM
Subject: Re: News from rebuild
On 06/24/2011 02:41 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
2011/6/24 Marcela
Hello list,
you might notice that rebuild stopped for a while. I run out of packages, which
had normal dependencies. Now I have a list of cyclic dependencies, which are
dependent back and forth.
Because we'll be doing mass rebuild every year, I'd like to use bootstrap
macro, which could help
- Original Message -
From: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:24:36 PM
Subject: Re: libmysqlclient soname version bumped by upstream
On 03/23/2011 08:03 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 23/03/11 13:54, Tom Lane
Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
mass rebuild.
dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be created
one big update, so please don't file your own updates into bodhi.
List of all dependent packages:
repoquery --whatrequires
- Original Message -
From: Robin 'cheese' Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
To: perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:21:50 AM
Subject: Manipulate Dev. release number properly
Hi!
RPM doen't generate proper version numbers for Dev. releases of
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:55:26 AM
Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I completely agree.
At least nag-mails
- Original Message -
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
To: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:43:18 AM
Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:44:44 PM
Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
On 02/16/2011 10:55 AM,
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
To: Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de
Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 6:51:21 PM
Subject: Re: Procedure to push
- Original Message -
From: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
To: perl-net-dbus-ow...@fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 11:25:21 AM
Subject: perl-Net-DBus in EL6
Hi,
I'm interested in having perl-Net-DBus available in EPEL6. Is there
any
reason why it's
- Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Marcela Maslanova
mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
because of bug in paths (vendorarch), there will be needed
rebuild of some packages (~1300). I choose only those
which weren't rebuild with vendorarch in Perl
Hello,
because of bug in paths (vendorarch), there will be needed
rebuild of some packages (~1300). I choose only those
which weren't rebuild with vendorarch in Perl. [1]
I've asked for testing dist tag, so nothing will be
broken [2]. Rebuild will start next week.
Best regards,
Marcela
[1]
- Tom \spot\ Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
The Fedora Packaging Committee has an open seat. Are you interested
in
helping to decide the packaging standards and guidelines for Fedora?
Are
you familiar with the inner workings of RPM and its spec file magic?
Do
you make the wiki
- Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 05/14/2010 04:08 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
This is list of failed packages against dist-f14-perltest on
2010-05-14.
Comments on some packages I had a look into interspersed:
perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper
rebuilt
perl-AutoClass
false
Hello,
rpm automagically add some other requirements from your rpm, but
in this case I'm not sure from where. Also I didn't find
the correct 'indent' on cpan.
You can upload your srpm on web and ask on perl-devel list for help.
Maybe someone would know what's wrong with this package.
Best
Hello,
I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still
fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures.
perl-Acme-PlayCode
perl-Apache2-SOAP
perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper
perl-Archive-RPM
perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope
perl-Calendar-Simple
perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView
- Dave Cross d...@dave.org.uk wrote:
On 05/11/2010 02:42 PM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Hello,
I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still
fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures.
perl-Calendar-Simple
I released version 1.21 of Calendar::Simple purely
- Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
--- On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:06 AM, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585336
\--
Anyone would like to take the above simple, small package for review?
I can swap review a similar CPAN
Hello,
I prepared perl-5.12.0 for F-14. You can download test srpm [1] and check spec
file for mistakes. I'd like to remove compatibility macros MODULE_COMPAT, but
we'll need rebuild few modules which needs MODULE_COMPAT 5.10.0. I'm not sure
about 5.10.1, but I didn't run into problems after
- Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu wrote:
One thing we didn't talk about here -- given that the independent
subpackages are replacing dual-lifed core modules, should we be using
%perl_archlib/_privlib rather than %perl_vendorarch/_vendorlib? I
realise this is mainly nomenclature here,
- Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
On 16/03/10 16:33, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Marcela
Maslanovammasl...@redhat.com wrote:
- Iain Arnelliarn...@gmail.com wrote:
I
guess perl.spec needs a little more work up front to split as much
as
possible
- Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Marcela Maslanova
mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
I've decided fix my build failure of IO::Compress::* (#555420)
by updating to the latest version, which passed on my testing F-13.
Please someone take a look
Hello,
I've decided fix my build failure of IO::Compress::* (#555420)
by updating to the latest version, which passed on my testing F-13.
Please someone take a look at reviews: #573928, #573929, #573932
(We can trade reviews if anyone wants some).
Best regards,
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team
- Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
- Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:33:31 +0100
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Marcela
- Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:33:31 +0100
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Marcela Maslanova
mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
This should test
I created testing repo [1] with two updated core modules
and updates repo with perl(core) packages.
I've tested this scenario:
1/ perl package with perl-Module-Build-0.3500-110.fc13 and
perl-version-0.77-110.fc13
2/ update from [1] to perl-Module-Build-0.3603-1.perltestrepo.noarch.rpm and
In perl we have to often update package to fix one thing, but
this update needs higher version of different package, so we
are forced to update package even in older releases.
Chris and Ralf explained our reasons well in previous posts.
There are more worthless updates, so you should send some
- Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu
wrote:
I originally opposed the split of the perl package into perl +
sub-package for each included dual-life dist. My thinking then was
that upstream is upstream, and why should
Hello,
I'd like to ask on your opinion on dual lived modules in
our distro. I knew that Mandriva has the main perl package
and also provide rpms of sub-packages, which are easier to
update. They are using patch that allows them override the
core modules. Also debian has perl core and sub-packages
- Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:14:13AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
- Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I think banning stable pushes is the right idea. None of your
reasons
- Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken
dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
- Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu wrote:
So, I've been tinkering with a process to refresh or generate a
spec
file, with a couple goals in mind... #1 of which is make generation
and updating of Perl specs as routine and trivial as possible, so I
only have to think about the parts that
Hello,
the first problem was fixed by applying patch from
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=54457
but the second bug is still there. I saw the first
problem in more packages so hopefully this fix at least
some of bugs.
- Terje Røsten terje.ros...@ntnu.no wrote:
The F13 FTBFS:
my blog:
http://perlhacks.com/2010/02/building-rpms-from-cpan-distributions.php
Cheers,
Dave...
On 09/02/10 07:46, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Hello,
I want to ask upstream about it ;-)
I used cpanspec for generating spec, but that doesn't help
if rpm automagically creates
- Dave Cross d...@dave.org.uk wrote:
On 02/09/2010 08:10 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/08/2010 06:10 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
Hi,
I saw these bug reports starting to flow in two days ago,
just in time to mention them during my talk on FOSDEM.
The problem seems to be that the
I was thinking also about removing e.g. win32::api from requirements
automatically. But I'm not sure if it's worth it. If it's only one
module which we surely don't need, then it's maybe useless.
Also it would be great if we have this filtering will be mentioned
on page
Hello,
I want to ask upstream about it ;-)
I used cpanspec for generating spec, but that doesn't help
if rpm automagically creates requires probably from Makefile.
In Makefile.PL are tests like:
requires 'Win32::API' = '0.58' if win32;
but it doesn't seem to work in this case. I was
54 matches
Mail list logo
