commit e5a05d649d9729aea22fdafbb7d4e439e8484f23
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Feb 10 12:21:07 2011 +0800
Initial packaging of perl-AnyEvent-DBus.
This package was submitted for review in Fedora on Fri Jan 21 2011:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
commit 624caf2e1589f1136e7b42f572c981c67bd1dbf3
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Feb 16 10:54:31 2011 +0800
The package was approved in Fedora.
Sources were uploaded to the lookaside cache with fedpkg. This commit
reflects the change in the sources
Summary of changes:
969a821... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
9fb0d01... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
d62128d... - add default filtering - auto-update to 0.33.6 (by cpan-sp (*)
d7994fe... - add default filtering - auto-update to 0.33.6 (by cpan-sp (*)
commit 6301ba232ea7dcb106bc8272f4e7b59837db9b65
Merge: 4ee6ec5 e2e377a
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Jan 26 10:51:13 2011 +0800
Merge branch 'master' into el6
EL6 was just created, so let's base it on the Rawhide package rather
than the completely
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 07:11 -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
To: perl-net-dbus-ow...@fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 11:25:21 AM
Subject: perl-Net-DBus in EL6
Hi,
I'm interested in having
Hi,
I'm interested in having perl-Net-DBus available in EPEL6. Is there any
reason why it's not?
If the only reason is no one did it yet, then I would be willing to
help co-maintain it and make it happen.
Cheers,
--
Mathieu
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit 5957571cd52410147f76405082291536c72f2d55
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Jan 21 12:31:23 2011 +0800
Allow building on systems without %%fix_shbang_line macro (needed for EL6)
perl-Coro.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions
Summary of changes:
5957571... Allow building on systems without %%fix_shbang_line macro ( (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 20:50 +0200, Chris Spike wrote:
Hi,
Mohamed unfortunately doesn't answer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578957 or private mail, so
does anybody know how to get in touch with him?
I think he reads this list, and he is almost always on IRC, his nickname
is
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 22:14 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 15:21 +0100, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
I have no problems helping package this behemoth!
+1 : I can help out too.
Given that the Fedora OOo maintainer [1] is in the steering committee of
the new Document Foundation
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 10:20 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Hi Pierre-Yves,
How you're doing? We met at Fosdem last time. I'm the Tunisian guy :)
OK, thanks. The git tree would be interesting too :)
The Fedora packages histories are kept in git trees. You can get each
one by running:
$ fedpkg
On 07/29/2010 07:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:02 +0200
Sven Lankess...@lank.es wrote:
Can we please orphan his packages?:
I'm ok with it as a FESCo member. There's a 3 day objection time now in
the policy...
packages with co-maintainers:
[... snip ...]
openlayers
On 07/30/2010 11:24 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:52:37 +0100
Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
I was asked to bring this up here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595060
(http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2010-July/000170.html)
I added a
On 07/11/2010 03:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
The signal-to-noise ratio in Bugzilla has definitely dropped since
ABRT is introduced. Newer versions do require some text to be inserted
before it will submit the bug report, but perhaps it has to be
modified further to require a minimum
.
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
duplicate crashes and hope that one of the new affected users will be
able to provide a way to reproduce the crash.
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
issues?
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
tied to a specific bug, except the
bug is not known in advance but rather specified by the tester. Gotta
think about it. :)
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
be no need for such a number, and we would be able to evaluate
updates properly based just on the information listed.
What are everyone's thoughts on this? Thanks!
I totally agree that this would be far more desirable than the current
+1/-1 system.
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing
decent update notes?
I don't know, maybe that's just a crazy idea... ;)
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
it?
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
.
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
, and yet it already
happened to me. I can't imagine how little patience must remain for
those who have been facing this kind of problems for years. :-/
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
anything else. Why would I bother if they don't care?
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
the same new features as those on F11
To me, not updating F(x-1) to the same level as Fx is actually the
best way to let people their right to skip a Version. If you update
F(x-1) to the same level as Fx, then those users will (almost) not
have skipped anything.
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 13:51, Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Mathieu Bridon
boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 13:33, Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
What cost? I'm the maintainer of those packages. If i
to create the security
types on updates is worthless.
We can't change Bodhi metadata after the fact at this time. Bodhi admins
might be able to do it, but maintainers definitely aren't.
Where's the RFE ticket?
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
was:
In F12, I have a rawhide.repo I can use if I want to move to Rawhide.
What do I use if I want to move to F13?
At least, that's what I am wondering.
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
. Except that, well, the released branches are not «
leather » but « Fedora » (probably made out of leather though :)
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 18:38, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 17:29 +0100, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 16:52, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote:
Rawhide - Rawhide dir as we know it
Tanning - Devel branch for next release, in this case 13
are fixed now.
Was it really a good idea to push it to a stable release of Fedora if
it was such a « large-scale change » ?
--
Mathieu Bridon
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
501 - 531 of 531 matches
Mail list logo
