On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/02/2015 10:03 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
wrote:
You'd have to get the kernel changed for that information leak to be
fixed.
That said,
Hi,
I am developing a Dockerfile for X2Go. I intend to submit a PR to
fedora-Dockerfiles within a week.
https://github.com/mikedep333/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/add-x2go
(X2Go was already added in F20)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/X2Go
Example Dockerfile with systemd:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Michael DePaulo wrote:
I too come from an Ubuntu/Debian background. Like other major pieces
of software, Ubuntu and Debian both make multiple 2.x or 3.x versions
of LLVM available for each release of their OS. They do
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
everything built by this Friday and the update available in testing
by Monday. Test feedback would
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 13:01 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
everything built by this Friday and the update
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/04/2014 06:39 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
What do you think? Would this help towards the goals listed above?
Would it help _other_ things? What downsides would it bring?
It sounds a lot like releasing a new compose
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Richard Hughes wrote:
On 4 December 2014 at 14:39, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
including holding GNOME and other showcase software to the same
version.
I think that would be *very* unpopular with the
On Dec 4, 2014 9:39 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
While I'm waiting for an RC5 test install to complete... :)
At yesterday's FESCo meeting, while discussing the Fedora 22 schedule,
Stephen Gallagher suggested the idea of moving to a release schedule
modeled after Intel's
Hi Everyone,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 November 2014 05:22, Michael DePaulo mikedep...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to package all of GNOME Flashback and I was wondering if
you had any intention of doing so. if not, I'm curious
Hi Richard,
I noticed that in June you updated Metacity to 3.12.0 to Fedora. Thank
you for doing so.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/metacity.git/log/?h=f21
As you may know, the upstream GNOME Flashback project is now
maintaining Metacity and several other components.
10 matches
Mail list logo
