Re: FYI: CFLAGS=%{optflags} dropped in american-fuzzy-lop

On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 03:47:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 01:15:48PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> It worked with the previous version of AFL 4.33c, so something seems > >> to have changed ups

Re: Plan to retire cdbs

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 12:54:23PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 12:49 PM Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > The cdbs upstream developer has pointed out that cdbs is not needed as a > > dependency for pbuilder anymore and indeed serves no purpose in Fedora > > anymore. I he

Re: F44 Change Proposal: Mitigate vulnerabilities/attacks by enabling kernel.kptr_restrict and net.core.bpf_jit_harden by default, and by obsoleting a package that risks to accidentally disable kernel

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:28:29AM +, Christopher Klooz wrote: > These things are largely already tackled in the Discussion > topic. Please respond and post there, so that the discussion remains > consistent and avoid redundancy. Also, if you have ideas about how > to optimize the Docs or so, d

Re: F44 Change Proposal: Mitigate vulnerabilities/attacks by enabling kernel.kptr_restrict and net.core.bpf_jit_harden by default, and by obsoleting a package that risks to accidentally disable kernel

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 09:04:46PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > 2. Disabling debug for non-root users is 100% NO-GO for me, as it > will make Fedora unusable for development. It would also break abrt, > which is used for bug reporting. Yes, that was buried in the wall of text. Disabli

Re: Invalid maintainers for freeipa and retrace-server packages

On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 07:11:22AM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 10:27 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I don't use Gmail, but I've heard about this problem before, so it'd be > > good to try and workaround it. Would it be helpful if I sent a separate > > e

Re: Help on Fedora EPEL 10 build failure

On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 08:53:17PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Hi there > > This takes possible RHEL/EPEL friction to a new level. We're used to > packages which are built for RHEL but shipped partially only (libs > without devel). "Moving" a package from EPEL to RHEL, i.e. shipping it > in R

Re: gdal build times increased massively. debuginfo? libarrow?

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 09:38:12PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Kaleb, > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 03:02:33PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 2:26 PM Mark Wielaard > > wrote: > > > > > > It certainly looks that way. The ar format is not ideal to rewrite in > > > plac

Re: orphaning acpica-tools

On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 11:31:58AM -0600, Al Stone wrote: > I've been maintaining this package for a long time. It's pretty > stable, and most bugs get fixed in the Linux kernel first (it's > essentially the same code as the ACPI subsystem). > > But, life moves on. I just don't have the time, no

Re: long latencies on fedpkg srpm

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 05:31:02PM -0600, Leo Sandoval wrote: > This week I am experimenting long latencies when running  > > `fedpkg srpm` > > (around 5 minutes, real time). > > `strace -c fedpkg srpm` is telling me that the 'wait4' syscall is the one > consuming most of the time (85%) You'll

(Not quite) orphaning mingw-libgnurx (a regex library)

This is a very basic regexp library that as far as I can tell has no active upstream and hasn't been updated in about a decade. It seems like at some point in the distant past (> 18 years ago) it was extracted from glibc and made to work under mingw, but hasn't been kept up to date with the glibc

Re: [HEADS UP] [SONAME BUMP] libcbor will be updated to 0.12.0 in rawhide with a soname bump (second attempt)

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 05:02:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > For qemu: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=135121917 As that failed, try: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=135123636 -- ___ devel mailing l

Re: [HEADS UP] [SONAME BUMP] libcbor will be updated to 0.12.0 in rawhide with a soname bump (second attempt)

For qemu: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=135121917 -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-b

Re: AI-generated content in Fedora packages: do we have rules?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 07:24:22PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2025-07-17 at 15:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-07-17 at 15:18 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > In my opinion the situation is simple, as already several courts > > > hinted, the output of an AI cannot be copyrig

Re: AI-generated content in Fedora packages: do we have rules?

FWIW qemu decided to decline such contributions: https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/master/docs/devel/code-provenance.rst#use-of-ai-content-generators Of course downstream (Fedora) development is slightly different from upstream, but there are similar concerns. For projects I work on the main pr

The state of SFrame (was: Re: Remove -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer from build flags)

LWN this week has a good article on the state of SFrame: https://lwn.net/Articles/1029189/ (gift link: https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1029189/03199ce0a0862a83/) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: h

Re: OCaml rebuild needed

On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 01:51:21PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 8:50 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Also look out for ocaml-perl4caml as it seems to have a FTBFS, > > although I *believe* it's fixed by the earlier OCaml / Python change > > that y

Re: %license macro results in broken link

r or not "License: LGPL-2.0-or-later" is really the complete > license of the binary RPMs, considering that Fedora no longer > employs effective license analysis[1]. Agreed. Rich. > - Ben Beasley (FAS: music) > > [1] > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/l

%license macro results in broken link

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379753 It's reported that the /usr/share/licenses/mingw32-glib2/COPYING and /usr/share/licenses/mingw64-glib2/COPYING license files are both broken links. However the spec file seems totally normal: %files -n mingw32-glib2 -f mingw32-glib20.lang %

Re: OCaml rebuild needed

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 08:48:16AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 1:05 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Yes, please go ahead. > > > > Don't worry about libguestfs - if it's broken after the rebuild > > I will fix it myself. > >

Re: OCaml rebuild needed

On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 09:55:36AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > If we can get libguestfs sorted out, I am happy to do the builds > myself, since I am proposing to meddle with such a large number of > packages. Let me know if that is okay with you, Rich. Yes, please go ahead. Don't worry about lib

Did the pkgs.fedoraproject.org ssh hostkey change intentionally

I know that probably things aren't fully back up yet, but I absent-mindedly did a git pull just now. Is this expected? $ git pull @@@ @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Drop i686 support (system wide)

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:19:47PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > > To make the discussion concrete, could you grab a list of the actual > > libraries that we're talking about here? I'm interested in how hard > > it

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Drop i686 support (system wide)

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 01:37:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:19:47PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > > > To make the discussion concrete, could you grab a list of the actual > > > librari

Re: Remove -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer from build flags

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 07:48:56AM -, Indu Bhagat wrote: > For updated information about SFrame > https://sourceware.org/binutils/wiki/sframe. There is active involvement in > many of the projects involving SFrame at this time, and the status is > evolving. Bookmarked it, thanks! Rich. --

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Drop i686 support (system wide)

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 09:43:37AM -0500, Martin Jackson wrote: > I for one use steam on Fedora. And the i686 packages are critical path for > building the flatpak, right? (Though I admit I am not entirely sure inside > steam where the line is between what is native and what is encapsulated inside

Re: Remove -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer from build flags

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:17:18PM +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 11:43 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > We currently use -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer on various architectures. > > I think we should remove it because it does not work as expected. > > > > Obviously, this does no

Re: Remove -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer from build flags

On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 11:41:48AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > The reason is what GCC calls shrink-wrapping. It's related to this old > optimization: > > Minimizing register usage penalty at procedure calls > > > Basically it pushes optiona

Re: Linux VMs with virtio devices may be broken in Rawhide

On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 07:02:29PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > SeaBIOS 1.17 seems to break virtio devices in Linux VMs: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2372329 So this turns out to be a latent bug (kind of) in libguestfs. See the link above for more details.

Re: OCaml rebuild needed

(NB: CC-ing devel for visibility) On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 01:34:21PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:22 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Note also: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368289 > > > > So if it's not

Linux VMs with virtio devices may be broken in Rawhide

SeaBIOS 1.17 seems to break virtio devices in Linux VMs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2372329 If your Linux VMs suddenly appear to have no disks, this may be why. Downgrading to SeaBIOS 1.16 (or using UEFI for VMs) is the workaround. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group,

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 09:25:47AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 8:45 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 02:52:06PM -0500, maxwell--- via devel-announce > > wrote: > > > ocaml-odocdefolos, orphan

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 02:52:06PM -0500, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote: > ocaml-odocdefolos, orphan 1 weeks > ago I thought this one might be used by more packages, but I think the only dependency chain is ocaml-odoc -> ocaml-sedlex -> haxe. I th

Re: Slowness of installing *-selinux subpackages

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 07:35:28PM +0200, Petr Lautrbach wrote: > Neal Gompa writes: > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 6:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > >> > >> [This is a general moan / observation ... Sorry!] > >> > >> SELinux policy i

Slowness of installing *-selinux subpackages

[This is a general moan / observation ... Sorry!] SELinux policy is sometimes now split so that packages can carry their own policy subpackage. Examples include: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/passt/blob/rawhide/f/passt.spec#_36 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nbdkit/blob/rawhide/f/nbdkit

Re: gettext 1.25 & error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNU_GETTEXT

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:54:55PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2025 15:22:48 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Seemingly because of gettext 1.25 that was recently added to Fedora > > Rawhide, I'm now getting the error below. This also breaks all b

Re: gettext 1.25 & error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNU_GETTEXT

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 03:22:48PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > m4/guestfs-libraries.m4:158: warning: macro 'AM_GNU_GETTEXT' not found in > library > autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --force > configure:19161: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNU_GET

gettext 1.25 & error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNU_GETTEXT

Seemingly because of gettext 1.25 that was recently added to Fedora Rawhide, I'm now getting the error below. This also breaks all builds of libguestfs and related tools in Rawhide. $ autoreconf -fiv autoreconf: export WARNINGS= autoreconf: Entering directory '.' autoreconf: configure.ac

Orphaned: libdnet - Simple portable interface to lowlevel networking routines

I took on libdnet because it was a build dependency of open-vm-tools. However I'm no longer maintaining that package, but also libdnet is no longer a dependency of open-vm-tools. Also a bug was filed against it today ... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366844 I'm going to orphan lib

Re: wget1 in Fedora

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 12:40:13PM +0200, Michal Ruprich wrote: > Hi, > > I've re-added the original wget as wget1 in Rawhide and also in F41 > and F42 (updates now in Bodhi). wget binary is provided by > wget1-wget subpackage. Once these updates get to the compose, if you > want to start using wg

Re: %configure fails, print config.log

On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 08:50:21PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2025/05/06 20:44: > >I have a failure in %configure which only happens on i686: > > > >https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2710279 > > > >>config

Re: %configure fails, print config.log

On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 01:49:26PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 1:44 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > I have a failure in %configure which only happens on i686: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2710279 >

%configure fails, print config.log

I have a failure in %configure which only happens on i686: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2710279 > configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables > See 'config.log' for more details This isn't about this specific failure, but more of a shell / RPM macro expansion

Re: [rpms/vpnc] PR #3: Fix build when sbindir != /usr/sbin

On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 04:37:16PM +0200, Christian Krause wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Looks like there are some people around who need vpnc working...  Yup, at least two bugs have been reported (probably duplicates): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2362815 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Re: Discussion about dropping qemu builds on i686

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 05:53:36PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 4:10 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > Can we just stop building for i686 in Fedora in general, instead of burning > > maintainer time figuring out deps problems like this... ? What's the > > blocker an

Discussion about dropping qemu builds on i686

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qemu/pull-request/83 Previous discussion: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/C2U5RBADZB2ZUMR74PLNV73C3AIPSLWH/#C2U5RBADZB2ZUMR74PLNV73C3AIPSLWH qemu currently builds binaries for i686, see eg: https://koji.fedorapr

Re: Discussion about dropping qemu builds on i686

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:32:35AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15 2025 at 05:18:06 PM +01:00:00, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > >What about Webex, the awful video conferencing software? I've no > >desire to investigate this, but ISTR it lin

Re: Discussion about dropping qemu builds on i686

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:14:08PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:43:38AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > > > > Has anyone gone through the effort of removing i686 from a wide reaching > >

Re: Is 'sharutils' still needed in Fedora?

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:55:15AM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote: > Hi, > > The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if > there > is still a need for this package. [1] > > I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them > are > crucial for

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Package builds are expected to be reproducible (system-wide)

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:48:21PM +, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrot> * mingw packages have irreproducible debug data. Anything more information about this? What is it about the "debug data" which is a problem, and can anything be done about it? I assume this refers to files like /us

Re: Unresponsive packager: nilskoenig

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 09:48:04AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:46:32PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > We have be

Re: Konflux: What is the right time?

On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 01:00:38PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:31 -0800, Michel Lind wrote: > > If this is both too heavy to evaluate on recent hardware, and also not > > reproducibly deployable, it seems to currently be in a state where it has > > all the drawbacks o

Re: Konflux: What is the right time?

On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 11:31:54AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 10:39 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 10:24 AM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:27:59AM -0800, Michel Lind wrot

Re: Konflux: What is the right time?

On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:27:59AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote: > - how easy is it to bootstrap the different options (Konflux, Koji, OBS etc)? > - how easy is it to run each locally for those who want to dogfood the > process or participate in development? I'm not sure it's really necessary to run

Re: Konflux: What is the right time?

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:56:21PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > A few weeks back I started a discussion about accidental secrets, > using Konflux as an example.  Now that FOSDEM has come and gone, I’d > like to take the topic further. If you’re not familiar with it, > in its own words, Konflux

Re: Unresponsive packager: nilskoenig

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > We have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they > have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account. > This is a requirement for Fedora packagers. > > Does s

Re: What's the error in this build?

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 01:14:28PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:09:59 + > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > > > This is a Fedora 40 build which fails, whereas the almost exact same > > builds of this package wor

What's the error in this build?

This is a Fedora 40 build which fails, whereas the almost exact same builds of this package worked fine in F41/42/43. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=129681254 I'm having a hard time trying to work out what the actual error is ... I was wondering if perhaps Fedora 40 is now

Re: Strange s390x failures in scratch builds

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:49:35AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:44:25 + > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > When doing scratch builds (only from Pagure pull requests?) we get > > this strange error on s390x builders: > > > &

Strange s390x failures in scratch builds

When doing scratch builds (only from Pagure pull requests?) we get this strange error on s390x builders: GenericError: Downloaded file http://kojipkgs-cache03.s390.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/1737/129631737/ocaml-gettext-0.5.0-1.fc43.src.rpm doesn't match expected size (0 vs 145364) Here are

Re: F43 change Proposal: Disabling support of building OpenSSL engines (system-wide)

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:55:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > 'fedrq wr -b rawhide openssl-devel-engine | wc -l' says 62. That list should have been in the proposal! Here it is anyway ... bind-32:9.18.33-1.fc43.src boinc-client-8.0.2-2.fc42.src cpprest-2.10.19-6.fc42.src curl-8.

Re: Multiple kernels

On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 09:14:21PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 2/22/25 6:50 PM, Benson Muite wrote: > >> > >> Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as > >> OpenHarmony support multiple kernels to enable re

Re: Proposal: Allow all packagers to push empty commits to any package

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:17:02PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > With the recent discussions about provenpackagers in Fedora, I > recently got an idea. > > One of the common needs for provenpackagers is to simply "bump and > rebuild" a set of dependencies. > > All packagers are already

Re: libnfs soname bump

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 11:51:47PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Le 2025-02-18 15:38, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : > >On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16. > >>

Re: libnfs soname bump

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Hi, > > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16. > > Affected packages are: > gvfs > qemu > vlc > xine-lib > kodi (RPM Fusion) > mpd (RPM Fusion) ... and this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331668 Hi Xavi

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:17:49AM +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to build the latest version of input-remapper[1] and I > guess some change to the test units has led to this error: > > […] > + /usr/bin/python3 -sP /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py -f > /build

Re: bin/sbin merge: Are we going to change kconfig MODPROBE_PATH?

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 01:57:01PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:03:21PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/5c8c229261f14159b54b9a32f12e5fa89d88b905/kernel/module/Kconfig#L416 > > > > Th

bin/sbin merge: Are we going to change kconfig MODPROBE_PATH?

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/5c8c229261f14159b54b9a32f12e5fa89d88b905/kernel/module/Kconfig#L416 This defaults to "/sbin/modprobe". Should it be changed to "/usr/bin/modprobe"? A few possible reasons: (1) Bad RPM installers that don't run scripts, specifically the filesystem.spec scri

Re: bin-sbin merge case of packages which install to hardcoded $DESTDIR/usr/sbin

On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:54:30PM +, Sérgio Basto via devel wrote: > Hi, > In this case: "packages which install to hardcoded $DESTDIR/usr/sbin, > but then use %{_sbindir} in %files, will need to be adjusted." > > I did this [1] after the make install, is that correct ? > > [1] > %if "%{_

Re: bin-sbin merge rebuild

On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:10:53PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:46:03PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:13:31AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:58:32AM +0100, Fl

Re: bin-sbin merge rebuild

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:46:03PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:13:31AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:58:32AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > > > > > > glibc > > > > > > If w

Orphaned: honggfuzz - a general-purpose fuzzer

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/honggfuzz I orphaned this one for a few reasons: - FTBFS with GCC 15 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2340615) - I don't use it. These days I recommend using AFL++ for fuzzing (Fedora package: american-fuzzy-lop) - Upstream is still twitchi

Re: [rfc] mass package change to introduce sysusers.d configs

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:06:43AM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On Суб, 25 сту 2025, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 01:25:18PM -0300, Rafael Jeffman wrote: > >>Some of these packages might have the same issue as > >>softhsm/opendnssec as they use the same user, b

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:07:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Much like libtest, the mass rebuild has inadvertently bumped the soname > of libnfs. libnfs 6 was in dist-git but had never been built for > Rawhide (there were some attempts in side tags, but they all seem to > have been garbage co

Re: Proposal for vendoring/bundling golang packages by default

I don't think supply chain security was really mentioned in the thread yet (apologies if it was - I only scanned it). There's a real danger that if we forgo responsibility for reviewing packages to another project, then someone can add a bad package to that other project and it becomes a problem f

Re: PQ [post-quantum] algorithms in Fedora 41 - improvements

Post quantum, I assume. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs,

Re: Retiring GlusterFS in Fedora 42. First Notice

On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 02:07:11PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 4, 2025, at 9:28 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Are you a packager? > > Yes > > What's your FAS ID? > > Fed500 Note that the entire virt stack (just about) depends on gluster, so please coordinate with us if you p

Re: Plans for OCaml 5.2/5.3

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 10:48:53AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:10:03PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Just a heads up for OCaml. > > > > We currently have OCaml 5.2.0 in Fedora 41 & Rawhide. > > > > OCaml 5.3.0 is e

Re: Non-responsive maintainer ngompa

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:04:16AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 08. 01. 25 10:27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:01:33AM -, Hong Xu wrote: > >>This email follows week 0.step 3 in the nonresponsive > >>maintainer page: > >>https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/P

Re: Help with flexiblas crash on aarch64 in kojij only

On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 10:32:56AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 1/4/25 11:33, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >Since the latest update to OpenBLAS 0.3.28 in rawhide, FlexiBLAS > >fails to build in aarch64 because OpenBLAS crashes in the LAPACK- > >xeigtstc_cec_in test. Note that OpenBLAS itself does

Re: Fedora-specific RabbitMQ patch allows remote connections with a known username out of the box

Thanks, I raised this PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rabbitmq-server/pull-request/10 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plu

Fedora-specific RabbitMQ patch allows remote connections with a known username out of the box

I just wanted to raise the visibility of this one as it was filed a couple of weeks ago by the upstream maintainer and seems serious: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333072 The patch in question was apparently created by John Eckersberg and added by Peter Lemenkov back in 2014-2016.

Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 02:28:09PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 16. 12. 24 v 23:13 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > >Dne 16. 12. 24 v 7:03 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > >> > >>And based on my experience, I doubt this particular > >>provenpackager status was stripped based on something like that.

Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 03:15:11PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: [...] I'm a little surprised by Peter's email that he also has little insight into why this was done. But I have no reason to believe one person over another in this. I'll just say I've found Peter to be a very helpful and trusted p

Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 05:33:10PM -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On Tuesday (2024-12-10), the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee > (FESCo) met in a private meeting to discuss whether Fedora contributor > Peter Robinson should retain his provenpackager privileges. Over the > last year, multiple priv

Re: libnfs soname bump

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:15:46PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:07:00PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname

Re: libnfs soname bump

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:07:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > > Hi, > > > > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16. > > > > Affected packages are: > > gvfs > > qemu >

Re: libnfs soname bump

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Hi, > > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16. > > Affected packages are: > gvfs > qemu > vlc > xine-lib > kodi (RPM Fusion) > mpd (RPM Fusion) > > Affected packagers are all CC'ed. > > I have requested a side tag and buil

Re: Rawhide, koji: cannot build because of conflicting requests

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 09:19:40AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: > I'm trying to build the KiCad package on rawhide via koji. I'm getting the > following errors: > > DEBUG util.py:459: Repositories loaded. > DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: > DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: p

Re: Renaming Java packages with "java" prefix?

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 01:39:46PM +0100, Marián Konček wrote: > I know that in Fedora package names are usually prefixed with the > name of the language they are shipped in their binary form. We have > "perl", "python", "ruby", "rust" and probably some more. > > I heard that Java packages for his

Re: Plans for OCaml 5.2/5.3

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:10:03PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Just a heads up for OCaml. > > We currently have OCaml 5.2.0 in Fedora 41 & Rawhide. > > OCaml 5.3.0 is expected to be released at the "end of November or > beginning of December"[1], so it woul

Re: 400 - Bad Request when login with FAS from bugzilla redirection

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 08:34:08AM +, Barry Scott wrote: ... > And it shows the "400 - Bad Request" messages. > > Following the link to Fedorta infrastructure > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues > > also ends with the "400 - Bad page". I get this frequently too. It usually w

Re: libarrow (Apache Arrow) SONAME bump in rawhide — third notice

ages: >  * ceph (I am the maintainer) >  * gdal (maintainer notified previously) >  * groonga (etc.) >  * myst-nb (etc.) >  * pcp (etc.) >  * root (etc.) >  * python- > {dask,dask-expr,distributed,formulaic,fsspec,geopandas,pandas,papermill,pyogrio} > (maintainers not notif

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:02:43PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:48:02PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > * Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > > > > > I think

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 11. 24 15:47, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:36:44PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>On 28. 11. 24 23:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > >>>On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:30 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M.

Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > I think I'd prefer to stay away from redhat-rpm-config. Not because it > > is a problem in Fedora, but because it will cause us pain downstream > > to deal with RHEL development process bureaucracy to com

Re: Rawhide right now: a weirdness omnishambles

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:54:35PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:38:43PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I just created a Fedora VM and updated it to Rawhide (didn't want to > > risk my actual Rawhide machine if the new kernel is dodgy!) &

Re: Rawhide right now: a weirdness omnishambles

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:38:43PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I just created a Fedora VM and updated it to Rawhide (didn't want to > risk my actual Rawhide machine if the new kernel is dodgy!) > > It has to be said I don't see anything unusual so far. I was able

Re: Rawhide right now: a weirdness omnishambles

I just created a Fedora VM and updated it to Rawhide (didn't want to risk my actual Rawhide machine if the new kernel is dodgy!) It has to be said I don't see anything unusual so far. I was able to install many new packages through 'dnf', so filesystem writes are likely working. I've got a kerne

Re: find-debuginfo failing with objcopy Permission denied error

On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 06:30:14PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, I missed this thread. Please do feel free to file a bugzilla > against debugedit for these kind of issues. > > On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 14:36 +0100, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote: > > the tcl package build started to fail with

Re: libarrow (Apache Arrow) SONAME bump in rawhide — second notice

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:55:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:36:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 08:37:11AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > >  * gdal (maintainer cc'd) > > > > https://koji.fed

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >