Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Debarshi Ray wrote:
>> With the addition of GDbus in Glib, is dbus-cxx still needed? People
>> should directly use the C++ bindings from glibmm, shouldn't they?
>
> Not everyone uses GLibâ¦
>
Which is actually dbus-cxx' raison d'être.
That, and the skeleton generator from
Hello all,
I'm not going to orphan these packages, but I would like to find
co-maintainers for any and all of them as I find myself with less and less
time to give them the full attention they need.
For anyone that does decide to take these on, I would be happy to let you
take the lead with the p
