Hi,
I will update tha package on next weekend.
cu romal
Am 09.08.14 um 10:11 schrieb poma:
On 09.08.2014 09:56, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 08:35:12AM +0200, poma wrote:
These two are waiting for more than two months!?
usb_modeswitch-2.2.0 is available
Hi,
THAT would be worhty of being called Fedora.Next .
cu romal
Am 28.01.14 01:35, schrieb Oron Peled:
On Monday 27 January 2014 14:01:32 Stephen Gallagher wrote:
...
or some mechanism to interactively configure and deploy a DHCP server.
IMO, that's exactly the crux of the matter. Most
Hi,
* Although it's certainly not the only reason, Fedora as _solely_ a hobbyist
desktop is not ideal for an upstream for RHEL server and cloud products.
No other system can be reinstalled / upgraded every six months. That
single fact IMHO kills all other use cases.
If I need a stable
Hi,
what is a role? Is database-server a usefull role?
Or would that go more to owncloud-server or joomla-server ...
This would then pull all packages in.
And if Owncloud supports several databases, Fedora should make a choice
and install only one of them. A user which cares so deeply to
Hi,
might be totaly out of scope for Fedora.next, but this is what I would
like to get better in Fedora.
If I install a Windows-Server with some services like DHCP or file
services, I get a working configuration.
- If I install a Fedora-server with dhcpd, dhcpd doesn't do anything
- If I
a commented sample that needs to be edited and then turned on. Is this
what you are looking for?
On 27/01/14 14:33, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Robert M. Albrecht li...@romal.de said:
If I install a Windows-Server with some services like DHCP or file
services, I get a working configuration.
Can
-config-file, which
reflects the running configuration.
Also it could to talk to firewalld to configure the firewall.
But I used dhcpd just as a (maybe bad) exmaple to explain my problem.
cu romal
Am 27.01.14 20:33, schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Robert M. Albrecht li...@romal.de said
Hi,
He's not suggesting turning services on by default just by installing
pacakges (I don't think). I think his request here is similar to our
Fedora Server Roles idea where there are special packages (possibly
meta-packages) that are separate from the simple installed bits. So
you might have
