Re: F41 Change Proposal: Anaconda as native Wayland application (System Wide)

On Tue, 2024-06-11 at 19:48 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Tuesday 11 June 2024 14:52:19 CEST Sérgio Basto wrote: > > I had enough with you an your attitude. You have been abusing the > good will > and temperament of many Fedora contributors for too long. Somebody >

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Anaconda as native Wayland application (System Wide)

ly to spam, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.

Re: Mass Package Change: Turn deprecated %patchN syntax into %patch -PN

he packages because at the moment , koschei [1] is saying that all that 1800 packages are FTBFS  [1] https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/ Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send a

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Anaconda as native Wayland application (System Wide)

ge. Of course, as telemetry is evil, we have > absolutely > no idea how many Fedora users actually hit this mechanism. TL;DR; if you may fallback to X11 , I don't have problems.  If we don't have way to use X11 , is just break Linux for many users -- Sérgio M. B. --

Re: Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it

Re: Announcement: pagure release 5.14.1 available

On Fri, 2024-05-24 at 16:55 +0200, Dominik Wombacher wrote: > [4] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pagure good news and thanks, I want to test in my local machine,  to do that I need the package updated, please add some builds . Best regards, -- Sérgio M

Re: Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

es: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.

Re: Intent to start ARC investigation git-forge replacement

On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: >  1. Suitability for dist-git and src.fedoraproject.org replacement Can someone explain me what is the problem of pagure ? please join to https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/2024-git-forge-evaluation/111795/20 Thanks -- Sérgio M

Re: When is Fedora 38 going EOL?

s.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedo

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 17:00 -0600, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3 > > > > What the heck? This should have been gimp2 for the old version, not > gi

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject

Re: The GRUB2 Bootloader – Installation and Configuration

On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 07:53 +0200, Peter Boy wrote: > > > > Am 04.05.2024 um 05:41 schrieb Sérgio Basto : > > > > Hi, > > About this documentation [0], finally talks about rescue a > > bootloader > > with live images ... (but I will wrote about that i

The GRUB2 Bootloader – Installation and Configuration

://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/grub2-bootloader/ [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/grub2-bootloader/#_lvm_steps [2]https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/grub2-bootloader/#_installing_grub2_on_a_uefi_system -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel

orphaning wdune

Hi, wdune is FTBFS on F40 and FTI on F41 and I haven't time to fix it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261785 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276277 Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Re: Picking up protobuf

est/26 ( move from protobuf-3.19.6 to 3.25.1 ) I think we should try enforce the update on rawhide , and just after look to protobuf-3.26. Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: clang: error: unsupported argument 'gnu2' to option '-mtls-dialect=' for target 'x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu'

le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/arc

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL9 updates obsoleted

rg/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > > -- > --- > Antonio Trande > Fedora Project > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/U

Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

(i.e. git log -1 --format=%cd --date=short | tr -d -)" and the most important, I don't see "great" benefits and give me more work . Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: So you can't just copy 'sources' from one package to another?

Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org &

shogun-data should be retired since shogun is retired

Hi, Some days ago I notice that shogun-data still in Fedora [1] but shogun is retired for 4 years [2], just run `fedpkg retire DESCRIPTION` is enough ? Thank you, [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shogun-data [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shogun -- Sérgio M. B

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 14:22 +0100, Allan via devel wrote: > På Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:09:26 -0400 > "Garry T. Williams" skrev: > > On Monday, March 18, 2024 4:46:01 PM EDT Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 16:17 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:  > >

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

may reinstall the package, it will not be obsoleted anymore. I don't agree with this behavior -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: [heads up] update to jpegxl-0.10.2 with soname bump in rawhide

vips-8.15.1-4.fc41 webkit2gtk4.0-2.42.5-3.fc41 webkitgtk-2.43.4-5.fc41 xine-lib-1.2.13-13.fc41 On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 01:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > new try, now with version 0.10.2 > > side-tag:  f41-build-side-85651 > > > On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:14 -0600, Micha

Re: [heads up] update to jpegxl-0.10.2 with soname bump in rawhide

new try, now with version 0.10.2 side-tag: f41-build-side-85651 On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:14 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14 2024 at 09:38:39 PM +00:00:00, Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > I found "cc1plus: out of memory allocating 603 bytes after a > >

Re: perl segfault in F40

f-0.11-18.fc40 from 29 February 2024 ... > > but > > it hasn't gone stable yet.  The version you are getting in F40 mock > > is > > perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf-0.11-17.fc40 from 25 January 2024, built > > against pkgconf 1.9.5, which had a different definition of > >

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 11:15 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:27 +, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > > > > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_plat

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/d

Re: GStreamer 1.24 Released With Vulkan H.264/H.265 Decode & Many Enhancements

delines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel ma

Re: GStreamer 1.24 Released With Vulkan H.264/H.265 Decode & Many Enhancements

use free (free from the word freedom) codecs Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.

[off-topic] Re: help needed with failing eccodes build for f40

d0301f7f5f50287c0bda35aa7ca7e > > and fixed in 2.5.2: > https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/pull/1515 > https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/commit/e521a5094be3be4f8657a2253958b0d752616479 > > So F39 and F38 buildroot openjpeg2  (2.5.0) is okay, F41 buildroot > openjpeg2 (2.

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 09:47 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb: > > On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

"thai-scalable-purisa-fonts" No match for group package "thai-scalable-sawasdee-fonts" No match for group package "thai-scalable-tlwgmono-fonts" No match for group package "thai-scalable-tlwgtypewriter-fonts" No match for group

Re: F40 Change Proposal: F40 Change Proposal: Unify /usr/bin and /usr/sbin (System-Wide)

On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 12:57 -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 08:04, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto > > > > > No. This is one

Re: F40 Change Proposal: F40 Change Proposal: Unify /usr/bin and /usr/sbin (System-Wide)

On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 09:17 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:04 AM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: F40 Change Proposal: F40 Change Proposal: Unify /usr/bin and /usr/sbin (System-Wide)

On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 20:14 +, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 7:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: Kickstart install of Rawhide fails

; To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archive

Re: F40 Change Proposal: F40 Change Proposal: Unify /usr/bin and /usr/sbin (System-Wide)

annoying in my experience. > > We cannot change this without breaking backward compatibility. It'll > have to stay that way until RHEL 9 falls out of support. That is a good argument to not change it , why we need break backward compatibility ? is not sbin for super users and bin

Re: Feedback wanted - pruning old rawhide chroots in Copr

list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List

Re: Need help with incompatible pointer types on i686

s.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-i

Re: Why branched config pointed to rolling config?

On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 15:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 13:38 +, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: > > Why branched config pointed to rolling config? > > # ls -ln | grep fedora-40 > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135   26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-aarch64.cfg -> > &

Re: [heads up] update to jpegxl-0.9.2 with soname bump in rawhide

delines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [heads up] update to jpegxl-0.9.2 with soname bump in rawhide

On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:41 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 2:53 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:28 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon ,

Re: Why branched config pointed to rolling config?

e mock-core-configs, but is not yet available , I'm going check it with Fedora Build System group -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: [heads up] update to jpegxl-0.9.2 with soname bump in rawhide

On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:28 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon , the goal > is > finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we > have any objection that prevent to proceeding. > As we already h

Re: exiv2 and protobuf hard to do soname bump without turbulence

On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 16:53 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:23 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to bring to your attention that Fedora would benefit with > > update of exiv2 [1] and  protobuf [2] but these packag

exiv2 and protobuf hard to do soname bump without turbulence

://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/exiv2/pull-request/6 [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/26 -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[heads up] update to jpegxl-0.9.2 with soname bump in rawhide

de seamonkey rawhide vips rawhide webkit2gtk4.0 rawhide webkitgtk rawhide xine-lib -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Cod

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:21 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Friday, 9 February 2024 11:53:01 CET Sérgio Basto wrote: > > so you agree that are giving the overhead to us (the people who > > want > > keep X11 as it is ) > > Yes!!! OF COURSE! > > If you

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 22:04 -0500, Steve Cossette wrote: > I > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:51 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto > > > wrote: > > > &g

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > > We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_ > > >

Re: [heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.9.0 with soname bump on rawhide

On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 16:06 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Bast

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

c ? http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/SemanticArgument1.png Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduc

Re: Interesting difference between Koji and COPR (_isa macro)

nes > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora

Re: [heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.9.0 with soname bump on rawhide

On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:30 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:48 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > Hi, > > >

Re: [heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.9.0 with soname bump on rawhide

On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1]. > > Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't > > touch > > th

Re: [heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.9.0 with soname bump on rawhide

On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is > > finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me kno

Re: [heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.9.0 with soname bump on rawhide

On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is > finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we > have any thing that prevent to proceeding. > mass rebuild started on s

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

you and Kevin. > > I cannot really speak for Sérgio. I do think his choice of words in > the > particular mail you are referring to could have been better. (In > particular, > I would not have used the word "crap" there.) But please keep in mind > that > he (like

[heads up] mass rebuild for opencv 4.9.0 with soname bump on rawhide

Hi, I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we have any thing that prevent to proceeding. Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

s/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le.

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

; List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- _

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 15:31 +0100, Leon Fauster via devel wrote: > Am 01.02.24 um 14:18 schrieb Sérgio Basto: > > > > The problem is not KDE SIG not support X11, the problem is KDE SIG > > want > > drop X11 and force user to use wayland . > > > Looking f

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

t have helped. What I'm trying to say basically is, I get that for > some legacy nvidia users the Wayland experience may not be optimal. > But will it ever be? Does that mean we can never drop x11? Will > anyone ever update those legacy nvidia drivers? Could they be? > > Le

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

roblem.  It seems like the > > missing functionality of Wayland is the bigger issue that needs to > > be > > addressed. > > > > Rich. > > > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel

Re: A reminder: you cannot just "revert" package version bumps

On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 16:33 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 2024-01-29 16:00, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_rawhide_is_allowed_to_lag_temporarily > > > > you may do a new build with lowe

just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165 and I'm very upset  -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: A reminder: you cannot just "revert" package version bumps

t; Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not repl

Re: HELP! What's up with OpenVDB?

_ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines &

Heads Up: lxc-5.0.x on rawhide

inconvenient I may roll back it. Happy hacking ! -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US

internal compiler error: in backward_pass, at tree-vect-slp.cc

/7413/112327413/build.log -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

guemar, sagarun, thm I'm also thinking update lxc from 4 to 5 based on https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/lxc -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to de

Re: Fedora 40 Mass Rebuild *finish* delayed

roject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email t

Re: Fedora 40 mass rebuild has begun

en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/ne

Re: Mass rebuild: git push --no-verify

On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 09:13 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:32 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > You got mass rebuild script here [1] in massrebuildsinfo.py [2] you > > may > > define what packages you are going to rebuild ,  in line 93 of > > ma

Re: HEADSUP boost and tbb rebuilds starting in a side tag

_ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > h

Re: Mass rebuild: git push --no-verify

elines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: side-tag with GCC 14.0.1 snapshot for Fedora 40

> List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- __

Re: Proven to be sickened

nes: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- > _

Re: Proven to be sickened

g_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list --

Re: How can I delete a rawhide Bodhi update?

dora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, rep

Re: Why I won't run for FESCo

lds , 2 updates etc etc . and guarantee that versions match ! I don't see any benefit . Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora C

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

gt; > rpms/copr-messaging > > rpms/mdk > > rpms/ndisc6 > > rpms/heat-cfntools > > rpms/fedwatch > > rpms/rubygem-whiskey_disk > > rpms/kstart > > rpms/perl-Authen-Krb5 > > rpms/perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP > > rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace > > rpms/perl

Re: Missing notifications

d Hat Automotive > Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard > battle. -- Ian MacClaren > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedor

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

ist Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. -- __

[EPEL-devel] Re: Packages to be untagged from epel-next

On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 09:35 +0200, Tuomo Soini wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:31:37 + > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, > > Is not an negative feedback, is a side note but I realize some time > > ago that version with next is bigger than version without next [1] &

[EPEL-devel] Re: Packages to be untagged from epel-next

7-0.7.8-1.el9.next > > rust-toml-0.8.2-1.el9.next > > rust-toml_edit0.19-0.19.15-1.el9.next > > rust-toml_edit-0.20.2-1.el9.next > > rust-ucd-parse-0.1.10-1.el9.next > > rust-winnow0.4-0.4.11-1.el9.next > > rust-winnow-0.5.16-1.el9.next > > rust-xml-rs-0.8.19-

Re: Automate your Fedora package maintenance using Packit

en- > US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproje > ct.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora- > infrastructure/new

Re: Heads up: Update SFML from 2.5.1 to 2.6.1 with soname bump coming to rawhide (finished)

On Sun, 2023-11-05 at 19:00 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > SFML will be build in sidetag f40-build-side-77060 . > > These packages will be rebuild : > CSFML > attract-mode > dolphin-emu > extremetuxracer > gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars

Heads up: Update SFML from 2.5.1 to 2.6.1 with soname bump coming to rawhide

Hi, SFML will be build in sidetag f40-build-side-77060 . These packages will be rebuild : CSFML attract-mode dolphin-emu extremetuxracer gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars marsshooter ostrichriders visualboyadvance-m Best regards -- Sérgio M. B

Re: python-3.12 distutils removal just happened after python mass rebuild and Fedora mass rebuild ?

On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 23:20 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 23:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 29. 09. 23 23:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 29. 09. 23 20:32, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Hi. > >

Re: Looking for a volunteer to automate the orphaned packages process

rg > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply

redhat-lsb-5.0 is arriving to rawhide, epel 9 and updates-testing of F39

that I found useful, the result is here [2] . Any feedback or help is welcome . [1] https://github.com/LinuxStandardBase/lsb-samples [2] https://pagure.io/redhat-lsb Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 16:11 +0200, Jens Kuehnel wrote: > Sorry, my mailer did remove an imporant \n. > > Am 04.10.23 um 01:16 schrieb Sérgio Basto: > Hi Sérgio, > > > I believe you, but this version is an "right most" bump and is > > "just" >

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:55 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote: > Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto: > > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce > > > > > > wrote: &g

Re: Orphaning all my packages

Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply t

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > a project > where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides > source code freely and openly what you are talking about ? all RHEL Source are freely available on Centos Stream , and RHEL never was free . -- Sé

Re: python-3.12 distutils removal just happened after python mass rebuild and Fedora mass rebuild ?

On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 23:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 09. 23 23:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 29. 09. 23 20:32, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi. > > > > > Recent build of some packages like opencv and an old gpgme shows > >

python-3.12 distutils removal just happened after python mass rebuild and Fedora mass rebuild ?

... Thank you, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: Need help with build failure

On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 21:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 15:47 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 16:25 +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > Have you managed to fix the issue? The error is produce

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

tps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >