Hi,
Since the thread is in top posting, I will top posting too ...
I also saw a "Native stack trace" [1] on Rawhide on nodejs-electron [2]
Best regards,
[2]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/electrons/build/7462286/
[1]
[432/39358] python3 ../../tools/polymer/html_to_wrapper.py
On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> 1. Suitability for dist-git and src.fedoraproject.org replacement
Can someone explain me what is the problem of pagure ?
please join to
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/2024-git-forge-evaluation/111795/20
Thanks
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 14:53 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When is Fedora 38 going EOL?
>
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html say
> s today
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-tasks.html say
> next week
>
> Which one is correct?
Bodhi
On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 17:00 -0600, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3
> >
>
> What the heck? This should have been gimp2 for the old version, not
> gi
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3
On Wed, 2024-05-08 at 20:43 +0200, Josef Řídký wrote:
> I believe once the GIMP 3.0 is out the Fedora version will follow
> almost immediately.
>
> Josef
> GIMP co-maintainer
>
> Dne po 6. 5. 2024 22:13 uživatel Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>
On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 07:53 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 04.05.2024 um 05:41 schrieb Sérgio Basto :
> >
> > Hi,
> > About this documentation [0], finally talks about rescue a
> > bootloader
> > with live images ... (but I will wrote about that i
Hi,
About this documentation [0], finally talks about rescue a bootloader
with live images ... (but I will wrote about that in another time)
I run in trouble on cloning a disk from an old computer and starting
booting on a new computer , security get the thing more complicated, I
had to disable
Hi,
wdune is FTBFS on F40 and FTI on F41 and I haven't time to fix it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261785
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276277
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, 2024-04-17 at 21:51 -0500, Michel Lind wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> protobuf was recently orphaned without any announcement to this list.
>
> I've picked it up since et depends on it.
>
Update protobuf is a huge task
see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/26 ( move
from
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 10:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
>
I think is this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263180
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
>
> [+] All set and ready to build.
>
Following Fabio Valentini tip ,
One thing you *could* try is do a new side-tag and move the builds to
there .
and example of move build :
koji move-build epel8-testing-candidate epel8-build-side-52356
ImageMagick-6.9.12.44-1.el8
On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 11:46 +0200, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 15:15 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm revisting the topic of rpmautospec because I was doing some work
> on various packages, and it's annoying that some packages are using
> rpmautospec and others are not.
>
> All my packages have been
On Fri, 2024-03-08 at 16:19 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For mingw-* packages we (sometimes) have a separate package from the
> native package, eg. libgcrypt vs mingw-libgcrypt. Therefore two
> different packages are sometimes built with the exact same sources.
>
> However I discovered
Hi,
Some days ago I notice that shogun-data still in Fedora [1] but shogun
is retired for 4 years [2], just run `fedpkg retire DESCRIPTION` is
enough ?
Thank you,
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shogun-data
[2]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shogun
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 14:22 +0100, Allan via devel wrote:
> På Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:09:26 -0400
> "Garry T. Williams" skrev:
> > On Monday, March 18, 2024 4:46:01 PM EDT Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 16:17 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> >
On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 16:17 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 4:06:46 AM EDT Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> > Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > > I hope my report can be resolved before I am forced to use
> > > Wayland.
> >
> > You will not be forced to use Wayland.
vips-8.15.1-4.fc41
webkit2gtk4.0-2.42.5-3.fc41
webkitgtk-2.43.4-5.fc41
xine-lib-1.2.13-13.fc41
On Wed, 2024-03-13 at 01:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> new try, now with version 0.10.2
>
> side-tag: f41-build-side-85651
>
>
> On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:14 -0600, Micha
new try, now with version 0.10.2
side-tag: f41-build-side-85651
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:14 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14 2024 at 09:38:39 PM +00:00:00, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > I found "cc1plus: out of memory allocating 603 bytes after a
> >
On Mon, 2024-03-11 at 15:11 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 04:07 Jerry James wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 10:38 AM Orion Poplawski
> > wrote:
> > > I'm starting to see this building perl-Alien-CFITSIO in F40 (not
> > > rawhide):
> > >
> > > + cd
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 11:15 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:27 +, Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_plat
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:27 +, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> >
> > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --
> >
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 21:36 +, Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> > The Fedora gstreamer maintainers regularly and actively update and
> > maintain the GST stack, I'm not sure what a message with just a
> > link
> > provides, did you have a particular query you wanted answered about
> > the release
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 03:28 +, Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> https://www.phoronix.com/news/GStreamer-1.24-Released
AFAIK Fedora can't have H264 neither H265 decoding or encoding because
these codecs are patented and have royalties and you don't have way to
get around.
The solution is to use
On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 19:19 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Petr Pisar wrote on 2024/02/29 18:35:
> > V Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:02:32AM +0100, Jos de Kloe napsal(a):
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > while doing koji builds for the latest eccodes version 2.34.1 I
> > > ran in to an
> > > issue that is
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 09:47 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > >
> > > # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
> > > ...
> > > No match for group package "multican"
> > > ...
> > >
> > > WTH?
> >
>
On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 12:57 -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 08:04, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> >
> > > No. This is one
On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 09:17 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:04 AM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 20:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 20:14 +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 7:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 16:28 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 15:32 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I've seeing:
> >
> > INFO:anaconda.modules.payloads.payload.dnf.transaction_progress:Ins
> > talled:
> > glibc-common-2.39.9000-
> > 1.fc41.x86_64 1708040026
> >
On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 20:14 +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 7:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin
> > >
> >
> > One additional item to
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 23:45 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 4:25 PM Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
> >
>
> (snip)
>
> >
> > I see this somehow connected to the discussion about signing keys
> > that
> > we had recently. A radical solution would be: branch rawhide, not
> >
On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 14:01 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Orion Poplawski:
>
> > It seems that numpy is defining a uint32_t type as long unsigned
> > int
> > on i686, while glibc(?) is defining it as unsigned int. Now what
> > puzzles me a little is that on i686 aren't these both 4-byte
> >
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 15:38 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 13:38 +, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> > Why branched config pointed to rolling config?
> > # ls -ln | grep fedora-40
> > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-aarch64.cfg ->
> &
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 12:57 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> I checked the build log for
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113473592 but
> unfortunately I don't actually see any error message. I searched for
> "error:" (indicating a compiler error) and I also searched
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 16:41 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 2:53 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:28 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon ,
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 13:38 +, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> Why branched config pointed to rolling config?
> # ls -ln | grep fedora-40
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-aarch64.cfg ->
> fedora-rawhide-aarch64.cfg
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 23 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-i386.cfg ->
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:28 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon , the goal
> is
> finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
> have any objection that prevent to proceeding.
>
As we already h
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 16:53 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:23 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to bring to your attention that Fedora would benefit with
> > update of exiv2 [1] and protobuf [2] but these packag
Hi,
I'd like to bring to your attention that Fedora would benefit with
update of exiv2 [1] and protobuf [2] but these packages have lots of
dependencies and the update of the dependent packages is not trivial .
tips, ideas and opinions ? to do these soname updates
thank you
[1]
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild [1] in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
have any objection that prevent to proceeding.
Best regards,
[1]
dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo={rpmfusion-{non,}free-,}rawhide
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 13:21 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Friday, 9 February 2024 11:53:01 CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > so you agree that are giving the overhead to us (the people who
> > want
> > keep X11 as it is )
>
> Yes!!! OF COURSE!
>
> If you
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 22:04 -0500, Steve Cossette wrote:
> I
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:51 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto
> > > wrote:
> > > &g
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 20:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:33 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> > > We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_
> > >
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 16:06 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Bast
On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 16:03 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> We are not banning nor deleting anything. We are not _supporting_ it.
you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately , when
many people , members of Fedora on devel mailing list, express that
they want have X11 , in fact we have
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 17:56 +0100, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today I found out an interesting difference between Koji and COPR.
> autowrap package has this in its specfile:
>
> Requires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-Cython%{?_isa}
>
> Which is incorrect for noarch package but hold on.
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:30 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:48 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > >
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1].
> > Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't
> > touch
> > th
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
> > finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me kno
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
> finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
> have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
>
mass rebuild started on s
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 03:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It's extremely obvious that people want to use it. You replied to
> > someone who did and denigrated their opinion. Frankly, I'm
> > disappointed in your response as well as the tone of you and Kevin.
>
> I
Hi,
I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know we
have any thing that prevent to proceeding.
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list --
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 14:42 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > Fedora still ships the previous release, server 1.20.x
>
> So should we not upgrade that to the latest upstream release (Xorg
> 21.0)?
I'm working on one pull request
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 01:34 -0600, Jonathan Bennett via devel wrote:
> Hey folks, outside observer, and long-time Fedora user weighing in
> with
> some thoughts. First off, I've been hyped to see Fedora lead the way
> with finally making a real move to Wayland, and retire X11. And now
> I'm
>
On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 15:31 +0100, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 01.02.24 um 14:18 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
>
>
> > The problem is not KDE SIG not support X11, the problem is KDE SIG
> > want
> > drop X11 and force user to use wayland .
>
>
> Looking f
t have helped. What I'm trying to say basically is, I get that for
> some legacy nvidia users the Wayland experience may not be optimal.
> But will it ever be? Does that mean we can never drop x11? Will
> anyone ever update those legacy nvidia drivers? Could they be?
>
> Le
On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 09:57 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 1/30/24 08:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:38:51AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > 3) Fedora has a long-standing and well-communicated stance that
> > > we are
> > > a Wayland distribution first
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 16:33 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2024-01-29 16:00, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_rawhide_is_allowed_to_lag_temporarily
> >
> > you may do a new build with lowe
Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
and I'm very upset
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 15:43 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> nirik ran a script that checks for versioning issues in Rawhide
> today,
> and it found several:
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11922#comment-893797
>
> Some of these followed a pattern, so I figured a reminder was in
> order.
> In
On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 15:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ben Beasley
> wrote:
> > Blender already excludes i686:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender/blob/8088da10c20e53ab0e1dd5de6fd3a2344bd288aa/f/blender.spec#_207
> >
> > So does prusa-slicer:
> >
Hi,
Unfortunately, I pushed the commit to rawhide when I just wanted just
it to my fork first and make one PR.
Anyway, lxc was ready to go and also lxc is a leaf package so the
impact should be small (otherwise it would have already reverted it).
So I triggered the build but if there is any
Hi,
MLT failed to build [2] with [1] , what do you suggest ?
Best regards,
[1]
builddir/build/BUILD/mlt-7.22.0/src/modules/gdk/pixops.c: In function
‘scale_line_22_yuv’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/mlt-7.22.0/src/modules/gdk/pixops.c:188:1:
internal compiler error: in backward_pass, at
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 17:38 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> lmms thm
I fixed the build , I base it on opensuse packages
https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP6/lmms?linkrev=base=9
> lxc hguemar,
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 05:05 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:01 AM Miroslav Suchý
> wrote:
> >
> > Dne 24. 01. 24 v 10:51 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
> > >
> > > All other milestones remain the same at this time and the
> > > published schedule[4] has been updated to reflect
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 15:50 +0530, Samyak Jain wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora Linux f40 schedule [1] we started a mass rebuild on
> 2024-01-17 for Fedora f40 but due to various reasons such as dnf
> issues, and other side-tags not getting merged we had to stop it.
> But we finally managed to
On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 09:13 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:32 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > You got mass rebuild script here [1] in massrebuildsinfo.py [2] you
> > may
> > define what packages you are going to rebuild , in line 93 of
> > ma
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 00:21 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:10, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them
> > > in
> > > the
On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 14:50 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Given the problems we had with font packages not being rebuilt in the
> last mass rebuild, can we ensure that the mass rebuild script uses
> "git push --no-verify" instead of plain "git push"?
>
> See:
> -
On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 14:01 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The f40-build-side-81394 side-tag contains new
> gcc, annobin, libtool and redhat-rpm-config for f40, meant to be
> tagged into rawhide shortly before the mass rebuild.
>
> If there is anything you'd like to rebuild against it
On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 11:41 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:21 AM Florian Weimer
> wrote:
> > Asking individual maintainers for trivial changes does not scale.
> > The
> > alternative would be not to address FTBFS and other build issues,
> > maybe
> > file bugs, and rely
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:26 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> So, due to me following my package (notmuch) upstream and testing
> early against upstream's git, reporting and working with upstream, I
> noticed a FTBFS and helped fixing it. Nothing urgent since it was
> basically just a test failing
On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 20:40 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mattia Verga via devel:
>
> > Il 23/11/23 16:40, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> > > I've got an update that I don't see pushed to stable. How do I
> > > make
> > > sure that doesn't happen?
> > >
> > > As it's for rawhide, I didn't
On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 20:40 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The communication channels
yeah , I had to go back to IRC if I want to communicate with certain
groups.
We went to Matrix because there was a bridge with IRC, but many people
didn't switch from IRC, the bridge collapsed and now we have
On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 08:27 +1100, Arthur G wrote:
> I recall a number of years back a proposed gcc upgrade broke many
> builds. This required most maintainers to log in and refactor their
> source code against the new gcc (and new gcc options).
>
> I hadn't logged into Fedora for years however I
I think the problem on src.fp.o
is
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EHDPRFVIWWN33XVWPPZ4HFADDZ64BPBK/
On Sun, 2023-11-19 at 15:13 -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> It could be due to the retirement of the old notifications system
> earlier
On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 21:57 +0100, Sandro wrote:
> On 18-11-2023 21:08, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > After 6 weeks, the package will be retired.
> > After another 8 weeks, a new review is needed to unretire it.
> > see
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_orphan_and_re
> >
On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 09:35 +0200, Tuomo Soini wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:31:37 +
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Is not an negative feedback, is a side note but I realize some time
> > ago that version with next is bigger than version without next [1]
&
Hi,
Is not an negative feedback, is a side note but I realize some time
ago that version with next is bigger than version without next [1]
therefore we should find a way that the el8 version be greater than the
el8.next version.
[1]
rpmdev-vercmp 1.el8.next 1.el8
1.el8.next > 1.el8
On
Hi,
have we an example working ?
I'd like had packit
for https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libphonenumber
Upstream Release Monitoring report here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237976
I'd like have the pull request , koji_build and bohi update
Thank you,
On Fri,
On Sun, 2023-11-05 at 19:00 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SFML will be build in sidetag f40-build-side-77060 .
>
> These packages will be rebuild :
> CSFML
> attract-mode
> dolphin-emu
> extremetuxracer
> gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars
Hi,
SFML will be build in sidetag f40-build-side-77060 .
These packages will be rebuild :
CSFML
attract-mode
dolphin-emu
extremetuxracer
gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars
marsshooter
ostrichriders
visualboyadvance-m
Best regards
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 23:20 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 23:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 29. 09. 23 23:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 29. 09. 23 20:32, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Hi.
> >
On Thu, 2023-10-19 at 11:06 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> you might know I run a script that generates
>
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.json
>
> The script is located at
>
Hi,
I finally finished firts version of redhat-lsb-5.0, I tried to collect
all the commits that exist on the internet and organize them, I chose
to fork the official lsb_release from linuxfoundation.org [1], and add
the original redhat-lsb-4.1 and then apply some commits found on the
internet
On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 16:11 +0200, Jens Kuehnel wrote:
> Sorry, my mailer did remove an imporant \n.
>
> Am 04.10.23 um 01:16 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> Hi Sérgio,
>
> > I believe you, but this version is an "right most" bump and is
> > "just"
>
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 20:55 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> Am 03.10.23 um 20:46 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
> > >
> > > wrote:
&g
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 13:13 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3 2023 at 01:19:20 PM -0400, Simo Sorce
> wrote:
> > Additionally *all* of the code is fully available in git form on
> > gitlab
> > as part of CentOS Stream.
>
> We all know or should know that this is false. It's easy
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:25 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> a project
> where the primary sponsor and downstream no longer provides
> source code freely and openly
what you are talking about ? all RHEL Source are freely available on
Centos Stream , and RHEL never was free .
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 23:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 09. 23 23:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 29. 09. 23 20:32, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > > Recent build of some packages like opencv and an old gpgme shows
> >
Hi,
Recent build of some packages like opencv and an old gpgme shows that
python-3.12 disutils has gone for good , but just after all mass
rebuilds and recently , what you advice to do ?
Any quick way to replace distutils ? the python 3.12 final release,
currently is scheduled for 2023-10-02
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 21:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 15:47 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 16:25 +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Have you managed to fix the issue? The error is produce
On Sun, 2023-09-17 at 23:48 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Ian Laurie wrote:
> > I didn't think the greeter used Wayland? So there may be something
> > else
> > going on. I cannot swear to it, but I don't think I've noticed
> > problems
> > in the greeter before.
> >
> > As Adam
On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 19:52 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > For Fedora Linux, the transition to KDE Plasma 6 will also include
> > dropping support for the X11 session entirely, leaving only Plasma
> > Wayland
> > as the sole offered desktop mode.
>
> Huh?! Why?! KDE upstream is still
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 15:47 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 16:25 +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Have you managed to fix the issue? The error is produce by the
> > configure
> > script and the check is implemented there somewhere ar
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 15:55 +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Am Fr., 8. Sept. 2023 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Sérgio Basto
> :
> >
> > On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 08:39 +0200, Sandro wrote:
> > > On 08-09-2023 02:36, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > xdg-utils is a MI
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 16:25 +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Have you managed to fix the issue? The error is produce by the
> configure
> script and the check is implemented there somewhere around line 4293
> but
> I don't understand it well enough to tell you what causing it to
> detect
>
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 16:25 +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Have you managed to fix the issue? The error is produce by the
> configure
> script and the check is implemented there somewhere around line 4293
> but
> I don't understand it well enough to tell you what causing it to
> detect
>
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 08:39 +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 08-09-2023 02:36, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > xdg-utils is a MIT License [1] what SPDX license have [2] ? if it
> > is
> > already a valid SPDX formula , what I should write on changelog ?
>
> Something like:
>
>
1 - 100 of 1516 matches
Mail list logo
