Re: Next F31 push?

On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 10:54 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:02:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > We do tweak the release schedule every so often, right now the > > freeze > > periods are fairly long compared to the historical average. I do > > think > > that's given u

Re: List of Python 2 packages to be removed mid-November

On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 16:24 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > sergiomb >gdesklets > (→ PY2) Since you want drop python2-gnome ... >gflags > (BuildRequires: python2-setuptools → PY2) fixed >python-GeoIP > python2-GeoIP (→ PY2) python-GeoIP have also python3-GeoIP >

Re: List of Python 2 packages to be removed mid-November

On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 17:59 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 10. 19 17:49, Leigh Scott wrote: > > On 29/10/2019 15:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > leigh123linux > > > xed > > > (BuildRequires: python2-gobject-base → PY2) > > > > Check your script as it returned a bogus result, xed has > >

Re: python-cssselect2/F31: unable to create update in bodhi

On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 15:21 +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > somehow I'm unable to create a new update for my new package > "python-cssselect2" (F31) and I'd like to know why. > > When I go to https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new and I enter > "python-cssselect2" in the "packages" f

Re: Next F31 push?

Hi, AFAIK , the logic is request an freeze exception , or next push will be just after F31 GA . I'd like have one unfreeze and push all packages that are waiting to be pushed to stable, when we have an NO-GO. I already made this request in past and, in resume, the idea was rejected with some vali

Re: koji web interface is very slow

On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 08:23 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 03:30:40PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On Thursday, 10 October 2019 04:42:57 CEST Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > Anyone else seeing this? If so, anyone know the reason and plans > > > to > > > fix? Thanks! >

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 14:06 +, Sergey Avseyev wrote: > mypaint is not retired you can take the onwership -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org F

Re: Fedora 31 Final Freeze

Hi, Some minutes before started "Final Freeze" we send some packages to stable on bodhi [1], but bodhi didn't push then ... . I.e After final freeze announce could we have the last bodhi push ? I my point of view is not fair as a developer , having to deal with Bodhi delays ... Thanks [1] http

Re: EPEL 7 is broken for python3 related builds

Now python 3.6 is shipped by RHEL 7.7 or Centos 7.7, the rules of [1] still valid so you should (or must ) use [2] [2]BuildRequires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-devel [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/EPEL7_Python3 On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 12:48 -0400, Irina Boverman wrote: > My build

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer drago01

On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 21:11 -0400, Chris wrote: > HI, > > I'm just following the process identified here: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ > > 1) I filled this issue back in June/2019: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=172085

Re: can we merge package.cfg into master ?

On Sat, 2019-09-28 at 15:18 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 9/27/19 10:29 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 12:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:03 PM Sérgio Basto > > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > >

Re: can we merge package.cfg into master

On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 12:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:03 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > Hi, > > epel 8 brings a new file called package.cfg, I strongly prefer to > > keep > > branches mergeable with fast forward , may we merge this into

can we merge package.cfg into master

Hi, epel 8 brings a new file called package.cfg, I strongly prefer to keep branches mergeable with fast forward , may we merge this into master ? like I did in pngquant [1] [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pngquant/commits/master Thanks -- Sérgio M. B. ___

Re: "mock exited with status 110, see root.log for more information"; but it's a build failure

On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 16:01 -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 11:02, Miroslav Suchý > wrote: > > Dne 25. 09. 19 v 4:59 Elliott Sales de Andrade napsal(a): > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1389518 > > > > I looked at this one and: > > > > h

Re: Orphaning python-MultipartPostHandler2

On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 10:12 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 14. 09. 19 22:51, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > I am the upstream maintainer of python-MultipartPostHandler2 , do > > we > > really need it on Python 3 ? or in Python3 we can do http POST(s) > > with > > Mult

Re: Orphaning python-MultipartPostHandler2

On Sat, 2019-09-14 at 17:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi. > I've orphaned python-MultipartPostHandler2. > > It seems to be a leaf package and I have absolutely zero use case for > it. I am the upstream maintainer of python-MultipartPostHandler2 , do we really need it on Python 3 ? or in Python

Re: mock -r fedora-31-i386 broken

On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 16:22 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 13.09.2019 14:53, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Understood - Give me a ping when Fedora has a usable infrastructure > > again. > > What is the purpose of using i386 mock today? how you build a multilib in mock or in copr ? > --

Re: [HEADS UP] Retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week

On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 22:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. Rawhide > only. > > As for now, nothing should break, except python2-debug will exist no more. > > Packages (build)requiring python2 or python2-devel should continue to work

orphaning subdownloader

Hi, I'm orphaning subdownloader becasuse Python3 version still and perhaps will stay forever in a pré beta version . And still have many bug which make it unusable . However I checked today and we have some new commits [1] . Anyway I decide focus my time in others projects ,,, Best regards, [1]

orphaning libcdaudio

Hi, libcdaudio last version was released in 2005 [1], I almost sure that isn't used in any package anymore for a long time, I think libcdio superseded it , so I decided orphan it . [1] https://sourceforge.net/projects/libcdaudio/files/ -- Sérgio M. B. ___

pygobject3-devel ? Re: [HEADS UP] Retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week

Hello, Is just a question . Can we have python2-gobject-devel and python3-gobject-devel instead pygobject3-devel [1] ? pygobject3-devel installs python27 and more python2 packages Thanks [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749589 On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 22:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok

Re: RPM building on s390x sometimes is very slow on F-30+

On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All, > > I've just got hit by this again - lockups on s390. Looks like I have > 100% reproducer (just try to build Erlang and it will stuck > eventually). > > * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37327589 > > Where

Re: Why retire Python 2 packages and games that still work to end user ?

On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 01:35 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 11. 08. 19 1:05, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Why we would retire childsplay or gcompris or gdesklets ? IMHO we > > still > > haven't a replacement . > > If the maintainer wants to, the

Why retire Python 2 packages and games that still work to end user ?

Hi, Why we would retire childsplay or gcompris or gdesklets ? IMHO we still haven't a replacement . From [1] I strongly disagree with the text, why all python 2 packages will be removed automatically and why I would have a lot of work if I want keep one package alive . why not the opposite ? .

[HEADS-UP] po4a-0.56 built on rawhide

Hi, I just submit po4a-0.56 to rawhide, po4a don't have any so-name bump but is wildly used , so some attention is advised . Thanks -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 17:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 13:03 +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > > Hello! > > > > чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 12:49, Petr Pisar : > > > On 2019-06-13, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > > > > I've noticed th

Re: Octave 4.4 update coming soon to rawhide

On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 15:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > Since Octave is not a core package I agree with update it for F29 . > > I'd like also update opencv in F29 from 3.4.1 to 3.4.4 but due > possible ABI breakage [1]. > For that I need a proven package

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 13:03 +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello! > > чт, 13 июн. 2019 г. в 12:49, Petr Pisar : > > On 2019-06-13, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > > > I've noticed that I cannot build Elixir in Rawhide anymore. It > > > got > > > stuck at tests and all I've got is a cryptic (at least to m

Re: opencv 3.4.6 built on rawhide

On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 14:50 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like also update opencv to 3.4.6 on stable branches but due > possible ABI breakage [1]. We might should rebuild all dependent > software . Personally I think we do not have to follow all the advice > of

opencv 3.4.6 going to rawhide

Hi, I'd like also update opencv to 3.4.6 on stable branches but due possible ABI breakage [1]. We might should rebuild all dependent software . Personally I think we do not have to follow all the advice of dist.abicheck , opencv have a lot of stuff , if one symbol is removed , doesn't meant that

Re: I found 2 problems on remove python2-foo packages

On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 03:25 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > If I may suggest, *absolutely not*. "Obsoletes: python2-foo" > specifically means that it includes and provides "python2-foo" > functionality, No , on update just force remove of python2-foo , doesn't provide it . instead dnf broken dep

I found 2 problems on remove python2-foo packages

Hi, These removed python2 packages are breaking upgrade path 1- when you remove python2-foo , you should add to main package Obsoletes: python2-foo 2- IMHO you should just remove python2-foo only on latest branches, please don't forget epel7 case, so please add something like : %if 0%{?fedora

Re: Inconsistent dnf provides result

On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:47 +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 09:29:33PM +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > > $ rpm -qlp dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm > > > /etc/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.logrotate > > > /etc/logrotate.d/dpmcopyd > > > /usr/lib/.build-id > > > /usr/lib/

Re: glassfish-jsp needs new permanent maintainer(s)

On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 23:56 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > If nobody claims the package within the next two weeks, we will > orphan > it again, setting it on its course towards retirement in about two > months. Why ? IMHO if package is not FTBFS or have unresolved bugs , it should remain on Fedor

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 22:23 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 13:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > > for > > sure that the package should be retir

Re: epel 8 anytime soon?

On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 07:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 7:11 AM wrote: > > Hi > > > > is it OK that i can see no traces of epel 8 on > > src.fedoraproject.org. > > if i assume a release date of 06.2019 i would expect to see some > > beta-code > > here. > > > > only traces

Re: Who's right? Fedora armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnu vs GNU armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf

On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 16:38 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On 32-bit ARM Fedora's %{configure} macro forces: > > ./configure ... --host=armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnu ... > > On the same host, config.guess prints: > > armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > The OCaml configure script tests for: >

Re: problem with rpm dependencies

On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 13:34 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > > On 24. 04. 19 11:14, Martin Gansser wrote: > > > > I see: > > > > Obsoletes: python2-mlt < 6.12.0-8 > > Obsoletes: mlt-python < 6.12.0-8 > > > > %package -n python3-mlt > > Obsoletes: %{name}-python2 < 6.12.0-8 > > > > I believe you s

(fix some typos) Re: How to submit Root CA to ship with Fedora

On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 11:35 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote: > Hi, > > Sri Lanka Cert is gonna implement local Root CA. > How we can submit this Root CA with Fedora? > > I could not find enough information on this. You can do one custom ca-certificates.noarch package and add your certificate to ca-t

Re: How to submit Root CA to ship with Fedora

On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 11:35 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote: > Hi, > > Sri Lanka Cert is gonna implement local Root CA. > How we can submit this Root CA with Fedora? > > I could not find enough information on this. you can do one custom ca-certificates-2018.2.26-2.fc29.noarch package and add your c

environment variables LANGUAGE

Hi, from this bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574222#c35 I have my locale all set to en_US.UTF-8 but LANGUAGE=en_US:pt , where LANGUAGE is set ? I can't find it Thanks -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor

Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf

On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 07:35 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > On 4/1/19 6:08 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 10:22 PM John Reiser > > wrote: > > > > On 3/31/19 7:31 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > I'm working on building PySide2 for Fedora and hav

Re: provider bad repo (network) or bug development ?

On Sun, 2019-03-31 at 10:56 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 31/03/2019 10:44, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > > > Take a look at my output ( see time and bad response of dnf tool > > versus > > kivi package) > > Where "bad response" means telling you there is no match? > > > I don't sure it is a

Re: VirtualBox 6 and Vagrant in Fedora 29

On Sun, 2019-03-31 at 10:04 +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hello, > > If like me you use Vagrant with VirtualBox, you may see an update to > version 6 from RPM Fusion free for f29. The problem you may face > later > is that f29's version of Vagrant doesn't support VirtualBox 6. > > This was en

Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30

Sorry , please discard my message, the user name was wrong here ... On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 02:55 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 13:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > > debug1: Next authentication method: publickey > > debug1: Offering public key: /home/martin/

Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30

On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 13:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > debug1: Next authentication method: publickey > debug1: Offering public key: /home/martin/.ssh/id_rsa RSA > SHA256:bHNp1Vhqsa4aRUMuVsXdBIALgvNzDzAriQKRvNxpQos agent > debug3: send packet: type 50 > debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait f

Re: ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)

On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 18:48 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 03. 19 18:18, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 11:08 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > sergiomb: nodejs-array-union > > > > why today ;) I'm associated to nodejs-array-union , s

Re: ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)

On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 11:08 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > sergiomb: nodejs-array-union why today ;) I'm associated to nodejs-array-union , seems to me thescript have a bug ... Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec

soname bump on libprojectM without announcement in rawhide

Sorry , I have updated libprojectM package with new autotools builds (developer changed etc). libprojectM was updated from 2.1.0 to 3.1.1rc3 in rawhide . dnf repoquery --available --whatrequires "libprojectM*" --alldeps --qf "%{sourcerpm}" | sed 's|\(-[^-]\+\)\{2\}src.rpm > > ' (...) cleme

soname bump on libprojectM with announcement in rawhide

Sorry , I have updated libprojectM package with new autotools builds (developer changed etc). libprojectM was updated from 2.1.0 to 3.1.1rc3 in rawhide . dnf repoquery --available --whatrequires "libprojectM*" --alldeps --qf "%{sourcerpm}" | sed 's|\(-[^-]\+\)\{2\}src.rpm ||' (...) clement

Re: [Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]

On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 19:06 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:45:49 +, you wrote: > > > > > After thinking , my suggestion is do not retire any java package. > > > > These package should be take by java sig . > > That's nice, who exactly is this Java sig you have kind

Re: Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency

On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 21:53 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I was just looking at reviewing this package: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684950 > > It is a Go wrapper around ffprobe, which is in the ffmpeg package, > which is in rpmfusion-free. The package can be built without > ff

Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3

On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 14:21 +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > No matching package to install: 'R-mapproj' -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora C

[Fwd: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 2 weeks)]

After thinking , my suggestion is do not retire any java package. These package should be take by java sig . Forwarded Message From: Miro Hrončok Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org,

Re: gcc again, only on i686 and f29+ hidden symbol cpu_model referenced by dso

On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 10:55 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Sérgio Basto: > > > On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 10:29 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > * Sérgio Basto: > > > > > > > [3] > > > > export LDFLAGS="%{?__global_ldflags} -share

Re: gcc again, only on i686 and f29+ hidden symbol cpu_model referenced by dso

On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 10:29 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Sérgio Basto: > > > [3] > > export LDFLAGS="%{?__global_ldflags} -shared" > > Not sure why you think this would work. It prevents the compiler > from > creating any executables at all. With -

Re: Help us test FedoraReview on Python 3

On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 12:28 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > There is a FedoraReview port to Python 3 that needs real word testing > by packagers. > > When you use FedoraReview, please use the Python 3 port instead to > help us find > bugs. > > Instructions are at https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull

Re: No builds of v8-314 for f30 and f31

On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 17:30 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > Hello, > > I am wondering what is the status of v8-314. In koji there are some > failed builds for f30. New builds are required because readline was > updated to a new version, thus Fedora 29 version is not able to > install. > > Error

gcc again only on i686 and f29+ hidden symbol cpu_model referenced by dso

Hi, Today [1] , I have updated libprojectM package with new autotools builds (developer changed etc). It builds fine in F28 on i686 but not in F29 or newer. After read [2] it exactly the same problem, only added -shared fix the build, not -lgcc etc ... I tried build on i686 with [3] but confi

Re: packages provides Re: HEADS UP: python2-sphinx is going away on Monday (2019-03-11)

On Sat, 2019-03-09 at 08:14 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:20 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > :P I just found a weird bug : > > > > dnf repoquery --available --whatrequires python2-mlt > > flowblade-0

packages provides Re: HEADS UP: python2-sphinx is going away on Monday (2019-03-11)

Hello, :P I just found a weird bug : dnf repoquery --available --whatrequires python2-mlt flowblade-0:1.16.0-2.gitd2f153f.fc28.noarch flowblade-0:2.0-1.fc28.noarch dnf repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide --enablerepo=rpmfusion-{,non}free-rawhide --available --requires flowblade

Re: Qt 5.12 coming to rawhide

On Sun, 2019-03-03 at 15:24 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Was qt 5.12.x supposed to be done in a side tag > > That was the original plan, but I gave up on that with the beta > freeze > quickly approaching. My apologies. ATM buildroot seems to be fixed . > -- Rex >

Re: Qt 5.12 coming to rawhide

On Sun, 2019-03-03 at 15:24 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Was qt 5.12.x supposed to be done in a side tag > > That was the original plan, but I gave up on that with the beta > freeze > quickly approaching. My apologies. Buildroot seems be fixed now . > -- Rex > ___

Re: Qt 5.12 coming to rawhide

On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 14:04 +, Rex Dieter wrote: > Continuing work in master branch (aka fc31), pending I didn't understood , when or how can I test builds against Qt 5.12 ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: GCC9 bug on ppc64le ? or why just fail in ppc64le rawhide?

On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 22:44 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Sérgio Basto: > > > stdio.h defines EOF as -1 , so if we want work with files > > and use EOF character, we need use signed chars, though . > > No, this is not how it works. > > Most C interfaces

Re: Reminder: Beta freeze and code complete deadline in one week

On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 16:09 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 2/26/19 11:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 10:38 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > According to the Fedora 30 schedule[1], the 100% code complete > > > deadline[2] for Changes is Tuesday,

Re: GCC9 bug on ppc64le ? or why just fail in ppc64le rawhide?

On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 20:52 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 26/02/19 19:42 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 14:46 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > On 26/02/19 13:28 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > * Sérgio Basto: > > > >

Re: GCC9 bug on ppc64le ? or why just fail in ppc64le rawhide?

On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 14:46 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 26/02/19 13:28 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Sérgio Basto: > > > > > The key was "can't represent -1 with an unsigned number" , I add > > > some sign char to the code [1] and it fix

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 06:22 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 11:23 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > RepoView just needs a patch to switch from rpmUtils and yum.comps > > to > > rpm and libcomps Python bindings, which I think I already wrote and > > put som

Re: Reminder: Beta freeze and code complete deadline in one week

On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 10:38 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > According to the Fedora 30 schedule[1], the 100% code complete > deadline[2] for Changes is Tuesday, 5 March. The beta freeze[3] > takes effect on this date as well. All Changes should be in "ON_QA" > state by then. I still haven't any compose

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 11:23 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > RepoView just needs a patch to switch from rpmUtils and yum.comps to > rpm and libcomps Python bindings, which I think I already wrote and > put somewhere. I'll have to dig it out. I need a tool to read repos and compare it , meanwhile I found

Re: GCC9 bug on ppc64le ? or why just fail in ppc64le rawhide?

On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 09:58 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 19:59 +, Sérgio wrote: > > Add -fsigned-char fix the build thanks, I still not understood, why > > only ppc64le and GCC 9 > > I can't speak to the gcc9 part, but this would probably have failed > on > aarch64 and s

GCC9 bug on ppc64le ? or why just fail in ppc64le rawhide?

Hi, I'm trying fix a FTBFS of gdcm , but just in ppc64le rawhide I have one strange compile error [1] which I can't find a solution, all logs where [2] . Can someone help me to fix it ? Thanks. [1] /builddir/build/BUILD/gdcm-2.8.8/Testing/Source/Common/Cxx/TestString2.cxx:29:24: error: narrow

how about retire package that are FTBFS more than 3 releases ?

Hi, how about retire package that are FTBFS more than 3 releases ? kde-plasma-activitymanager: FTBFS since F23 and should be retired [1] [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/kde-plasma-activitymanager/bugs Since we are retire orphan packages for more than x time , why not also take ca

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 20:18 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 16:33 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 4:30 PM Panu Matilainen < > > pmati...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > On 2/20/19 5:19 PM, Sérgio Bas

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 16:33 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 4:30 PM Panu Matilainen > wrote: > > > > On 2/20/19 5:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > > No, that was

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 16:31 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 4:20 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > No, that was a bad joke from my end, what I need is proper apt in > > &g

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > No, that was a bad joke from my end, what I need is proper apt in > Fedora to use sbuild. If you also do the review-request for apt [1] it would be great dh-python also welcomed :) [2] The problem is apt is in use by apt-rpm and was no

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 20:00 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > TLDR , apt-rpm should be retired because nobody use it since more > > than > > 10 years . > > > > I maintain a lot of debian package in Fedora but apt-debian still > > not > > on Official repos you can get it from my devel corp repo

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 08:21 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:40 AM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 11:03 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > Greetings packagers, > > > > > > I know how importan

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 11:03 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Greetings packagers, > > I know how important RPM is to the Fedora Project, but it breaks > everything downstream and we'd be better off using DPKG as we should > have from day one. > > I'm calling this initiative fedpkg: Fedora Embrac

Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change proposal: Mass Python 2 Package Removal

Hi, On remove python2-foo, shouldn't we add "Obsoletes: python2-foo" in foo package ? Thanks. On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 16:41 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal > > == Summary == > (Sub-)packages only providing python2 importable module

Re: GCC 9 OpenMP issues

On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 07:32 +, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 2/12/19 3:17 AM, Orion Poplawski ha scritto: > > Which is now leading to some (expected) compilation failures: > > > > BUILDSTDERR: nco_omp.c: In function 'nco_openmp_ini': > > BUILDSTDERR: nco_omp.c:210:38: error: 'fp_stderr' not specifi

Re: GCC 9 OpenMP issues

On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 13:42 -0700, Christoph Junghans wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:39 PM Orion Poplawski > wrote: > > > > On 2/12/19 1:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 07:17:25PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > Looks like GCC 9 is finally enforcing an OpenMP c

Re: GCC 9 OpenMP issues

I also have OpenMP issues in ufraw [1] and can help me too ? Thanks [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671080 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32347242 On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 19:17 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Looks like GCC 9 is finally enforcing an OpenMP

Re: signing status

On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 10:33 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 2/9/19 2:00 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 08. 02. 19 17:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Just wanted to update everyone on our current status. > > > > > > ... > > > > > > I'm hopeful that it will catch back up today and we can go back > > >

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 14:37 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:26:00PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > avgtime (maintained by: rjones) > > avgtime-0.5.1-0.17.git20150501.fc30.src requires ldc = > > 1:1.12.0-2.fc30 > > Hopefully fixed in avgtime-0.5.1-0.19.

Re: Fedora 30 Mass Rebuild

On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 12:06 +, Anderson, Charles R wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:48:59PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Per the Fedora 30 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora > > 30 > > on Jan 31st 2019. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 30 for the > > changes > > listed in: > >

Re: Is system-config-users maintained or not?

On Mon, 2019-02-04 at 13:35 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 09:30 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it seems system-config-users is broken [1], > > and appears to have no upstream [2]. > > > > Do we maintain it at this point at all? Should it be retired "for > > saf

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 12:27 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > (Note this change was previously submitted for Fedora 29: > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2064) > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Retire_YUM_3 > > == Summary == > Remove yum (v3) and all related packages from Fedora. > > == Owner ==

Re: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

On Sat, 2019-01-12 at 11:18 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 10:23 AM J. Scheurich wrote: > > > > > LMGTFY (fedora review swap ) > > > > > > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5OPPTTNKQF2S5PUOX4HNAW5B7R4UFREU/ > > >

Re: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 18:16 +0100, J. Scheurich wrote: > Hi, > > > Are there any tips how to get wdune fedora sponsoring ? > > > > What to do ? > > Propose a review swap , you review a package for other and other > > review > > your package and sponsor / mentor you . > > How to initialise a revie

Re: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 18:00 +0100, J. Scheurich wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any tips how to get wdune fedora sponsoring ? Is not wdune that need be sponsored is you that need be sponsored, you by being sponsored get permissions to write and include wdune in Fedora . I can't sponsor you because I

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

searching by pygtk2 we have 367 matches , it is all to be retired ? dnf repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide --enablerepo=rpmfusion-{,non}free-rawhide --available --whatrequi res pygtk2 --alldeps --qf "%{repoid} %{sourcerpm}" --quiet | sed 's|\(-[^-]\+\)\{2\}src.rpm||' | sort raw

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 15:16 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 3:10 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > Hi, (sorry for duplicates I sent from wrong email before) > > > > Nothing happened last week . > > > > Can you add me to https:

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

working with current release , we have a non functional fedora-review in repos , so IMHO this is the most urgent task to do . Thanks On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 16:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:30 AM Sérgio Basto < > ser...@serjux.com> wrote: > > > &g

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 16:36 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:30 AM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Any news ? > > > > "But I guess nothing's getting released, for some reason? fedora- > > review has been

S3TC / libtxc_dxtn Re: /usr/include/GL/glext.h:467:10: fatal error: KHR/khrplatform.h: No such file or directory

On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 13:29 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 09:23 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Got an e-mail from Koschei [1] with a notice that camotics package > > is > > starting to fail to build. The reason for this seems to be that > > something that used

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

Hi, Any news ? "But I guess nothing's getting released, for some reason? fedora-review has been on version 0.6.1 since May 2016; all package activity since then has been housekeeping rebuilds. " may you add me as admin to Fedora-review package ? to release a new version . Thanks On Sat, 2018-08-

Re: /usr/include/GL/glext.h:467:10: fatal error: KHR/khrplatform.h: No such file or directory

IIRC this is fixed with Mesa in rawhide On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 09:23 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > Hi, > > Got an e-mail from Koschei [1] with a notice that camotics package is > starting to fail to build. The reason for this seems to be that > something that used to pull mesa-libEGL-devel do

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >