https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769476
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Here's what's currently working for me in Rawhide (AMD 5400+, onboard nvidia
9100):
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-24.20110324git8378443.fc16.x86_64
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.10.0-5.fc16.x86_64
kernel-2.6.39-0.rc3.git2.0.fc16.x86_64 (manually deleted microcode.ko)
--
RockDoctor
--
devel mailing
Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
ccsm-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
compiz-0.9.2.2-0.8.git619abc05b1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compizconfig-python-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compiz-plugins-main-0.9.2.1-4.fc15.x86_64.rpm
fusion-icon-0.1.0-0.9.5e2dc9git.fc15.noarch.rpm
Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work
properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to
set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the
problem.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE?
Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and
modifying lxsession to use compiz rather than fusion icon left me
without window decorations and a usable mouse
--
devel mailing list
I have to agree with there being too many way to launch compiz. I've
decided I like having the fusion-icon applet in the panel, so I'll wait
to see what you've been able to do with fusion-icon. Compiz-gtk wants to
pull in 13 new packages - that's 13 too many, especially when one of
them (metacity)
Already running 2.6.33.1-26.fc13.i686 on my HP s3707c (AMD 5400+
Nvidia 9100 onboard) . No problems
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Not sure where to send this request, but since it was inspired by the
Fedora has become fat! discussion, this seems like an appropriate
place. I have a nicely tweaked installation of the LXDE spin sitting
on my hard drive that I would like to snapshot and place on a live
USB stick (ideally with
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 04:39:30AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
If the software is not maintained within Fedora, there's no notification
of soname bumps.
There is, soname bumps are supposed to be announced on this public list.
A list that is targetted at developers of
Instead of worrying about the occasional brokenness caused by an update to a
stable release, how about focusing on a mechanism to easily recover from it? As
long as the update hasn't corrupted any critical files, my non-optimal solution
is to head over to koji, grab the last version of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
