Hi,
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:57 +0100
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Steven Ellis wrote:
> > The issue on our home systems is 3rd party printer drivers.
> >
> > Eg
> > mfc9140cdncupswrapper-1.1.4-0.i386
> > dcpj4120dwlpr-3.0.1-1.i386
> > dcpj4120dwcupswrapper-3.0.1-1.i386
> >
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:54:12 -0400
David Cantrell wrote:
> If you use i686 packages for something now, please respond to this
> thread.
As many others, I need 32-bit printer drivers for my ~10 year old color
laser:
$ rpm -qa | grep i686
libgcc-11.2.1-9.fc35.i686
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:03:20 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:07:39 +0200
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
Any other suggestions then? Cause `pkg` would be my #1 choice.
Personally, I think adding another name just adds another problem.
kevin
Hi,
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 14:23:28 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Michael Scherer wrote:
When statistics cost you money, yeah, I think that's important to
take them in account. Maybe your employer do not care about this,
but I strongly suspect mine does, and I strongly
Hi,
I would like better integration with domain-specific package managers.
By which I mean npm (for node.js), gem (for ruby), pip (for python),
cpan (for perl), pecl/pear (for PHP), CRAN (for R), CTAN (for TeX), and
many more I'm sure.
By integrating RPM with these package managers, I feel it
On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:02:34 +0200
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 23. 5. 2013 at 10:53:10, Stijn Hoop wrote:
I would like better integration with domain-specific package
managers. By which I mean npm (for node.js), gem (for ruby), pip
(for python), cpan (for perl), pecl/pear
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:35:41 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
It isn't working because it's adding hundreds of new policy bugs in
every new Fedora release.
citation needed
Seriously, can you please stop extrapolating from your personal
usecase, and think of both the developers
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:47:48 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 02/06/2013 08:42 AM, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:46:32 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
The actual problem is the current Gnome 3 being an entirely
different product than Gnome 2
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:35:56 +0100
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le Ven 8 février 2013 13:22, Olav Vitters a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
I am providing a datapoint that directly contradicts your original
statement, namely
Hi,
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:01:49 +0800
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 11:12 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Sigh, let me try again: The Fedora project is pushing away Fedora
users from Fedora, because Fedora/RH have missed that it's new
DE (Gnome3) is
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:30:04 -0800
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 20:20 +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:07:55 -0500
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
From: Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com
the tool will be started using systemd unit file
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:31:33 -0500
James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 15:04 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:58:56PM +, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Features/YumGroupsAsObjects =
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:48:01 -0700
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
(I'm not sure if the new installer
even has an option for password-protecting grub2, offhand.)
It doesn't. And this seems to be
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:07:55 -0500
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
From: Martin Sivak msi...@redhat.com
the tool will be started using systemd unit file which can be
disabled. It will have to be explicit (even minimal install needs
users or root password), but we can figure something out.
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to
manage their own Ruby environments? ;-)
There used to be RVM in Fedora, but we dropped it,
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:29:57 -0700
Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:22 PM,
Seth Vidalskvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm less worried about the people requesting the newness b/c they
clearly want change. I'm worried about the people who run rhel
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:21:00 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 22:03 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:51:00AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
It's cute, but I think might read a bit bizarre in isolation.
'Ready for testing' is
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:36:26 +
Fedora Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
[...]
---
* Fri Jul 27 2012 - Andreas Schneider a...@redhat.com -
2:4.0.0-132.beta4
- Don't define an Epoch in RHEL releases.
May I ask why?
This makes it harder to compare
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:22:26 + (UTC)
Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 13:19:13 GMT, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
I wonder if it would be possible to do it on shutdown instead of
during start up? I usually do not care if shutdown takes ten
seconds or five
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:22:22 +0100
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 June 2012 08:08, Stijn Hoop st...@sandcat.nl wrote:
I agree that mind reading computers may not be the final answer...
Well, switching to system-update.service from a running desktop should
probably kill off
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:15:14 +0200
Roman Kennke rken...@redhat.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2012, 13:05 +0100 schrieb Johannes Lips:
I think the reason for shipping the latest upstream kernel is based
on the fact that backporting would be too much work.
On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:40:55 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 05/21/2012 12:21 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 05/21/12 10:23, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/21/2012 09:56 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Remi
Hi,
did I miss the last two days of rawhide compose mails or are they
failing? If so where can I check?
Regards,
--Stijn
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:11:24 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:02:39 +0100
Stijn Hoop st...@sandcat.nl wrote:
Hi,
did I miss the last two days of rawhide compose mails or are they
failing? If so where can I check?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:37:33 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Note that this has not actually been implemented in anaconda yet,
so if you do an anaconda upgrade at this time, it will explode
horribly. The bug requesting this support be added to
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:00:30 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
I realize this isn't a very constructive mail, and the point has been
raised before, but I'm hoping at some point the sheer weight of
complaints will cause someone more creative than myself to actually
come up with
Hi,
thanks for the detailed instructions for testing. I am not sure
though, whether any of this is applicable on a system already running
rawhide?
Reading this, I surmise that I have to do the following steps once
these packages hit rawhide. Can you comment on the correctness?
Currently
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:20:20 -0500
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, the proposal I'm making is the one that I've been following
personally in my own projects, which I feel is providing better
service to my users.
Speaking as a (mostly) user: I agree with this statement. I
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:38:57 -0600
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Stijn Hoop wrote:
Well it also took them two years to consider 'NFS mounted home' a
valid use case, during which the whole 'you really need MySQL!!!'
was broken for our site.
It's easy to switch (maybe I should
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:20:55 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
I'm of a mind to revisit this (again).
NO, not again!!!
Can we please stop this nonsense?
Upstream defaults to MySQL for a reason, and strongly recommends NOT
using the SQLite backend by
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:07:10 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
but they are often way behind current versions (ffmpeg, x264,
open-vm-tools) and then throw out a new x264, rebuild all packages
depending on it and rais only from .114 to .115 is a bad joke
while .119 exists since
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:02:26 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 08.12.2011 17:04, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Reindl Harald wrote:
my only changes was compile the x264.119 and fake the so-number
in the sources to .102 for F13/F14 and to .114/.115 for F15
and currently the .120
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:55:31 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 07.11.11 21:53, Gregory Maxwell (gmaxw...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
If run on the main namespace all they see is that the files
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:36:13 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Just Glibc Update Comedy Hour again.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745675
downgrade to glibc -10 fixes it.
So, just to ask a rhetorical question, how does this tie in to running
rawhide is bad mmkay
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:57:59 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Distro packaged extensions are frowned upon upstream.
[citation needed]
--Stijn
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:36:50 +0200
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
I would strongly prefer third parties not to reinvent whole
packaging and repositories concept. Some companies grasp it (I have
yum repos provided for Google Earth and Talk Plugin, Dell BIOSes and
firmwares, Adobe
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:43:09 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 à 12:26 +0200, Stijn Hoop a écrit :
and even better is the fact that I can now put that area
somewhere else than on our default stupidly-expensive backupped NFS
filesystem
Hi,
aside from the merits of adding ~/.local/bin, I just wanted to point
out:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:19:51 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
It's all been done to make nautilus happy with user-friendly
localized names on the user desktop (aping the windows mess). And
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:06:03 +0200
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 à 18:30 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson a
écrit :
Hum best is to provide you with example which daemon do you
maintain I can convert it for you and provide it to you as an
example
39 matches
Mail list logo
