- Original Message -
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:58:07 -0400 (EDT), Tomas Mlcoch wrote:
>
> > RPM itself expects epoch to be number:
> > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/140744377b019e0de81d76d0931c32228d2ed57e/lib/rpmvercmp.c#L124-L143
> >
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 04:12:20 -0400 (EDT), Tomas Mlcoch wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:15:02 +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > >
> > > > We discussed with Jan Silhan yesterday. It looks like something broken
> > >
- Original Message -
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:15:02 +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
We discussed with Jan Silhan yesterday. It looks like something broken in
createrepo/createrepo_c in F22. So it's not dnf/yum/hawkey/libsolv issue.
LOG:
How feasible would it be to keep the listings in primary.xml and
filelists.xml sorted by package name and arch? Doing so could open the door
to simple and efficient diffs of repository metadata.
Createrepo_c [1] keeps packages sorted by filename [2] by default.
Sorting based on filenames was
- Original Message -
Am 06.01.2014 14:06, schrieb Vít Ondruch:
Also, I'd like to point out that yum/dnf remove by default shows what it
is going to do and you have to
explicitly confirm the action, isn't it enough? How much protection do you
need?
to say it clear - *all*
Hello everyone,
my name is Tomas Mlcoch. I've just submitted my first package review request
for createrepo_c (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823811). The
package is a C implementation of the original createrepo tool. I'm a student at
Brno University of Technology and an intern