Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-11 Thread Will Benton
I pushed fixes for Scala on F22 and rawhide and for SBT on F22 last week and am working on fixing SBT for F23. Once this is taken care of, I'll be able to fix the other Scala ecosystem projects pretty quickly, although I am likely to retire some packages where the upstream source has diverged

Re: thrift compatibility concerns (Re: erlang-jsx about to be retired (Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-04-20)))

2015-04-21 Thread Will Benton
)) On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Will Benton wi...@redhat.com wrote: Dan, I've had some trouble updating Thrift to a newer upstream version but have been planning to spin an updated release without Erlang support in the meantime and will ping you when it's ready. Thanks! [snip] FWIW

Re: erlang-jsx about to be retired (Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-04-20))

2015-04-20 Thread Will Benton
To: devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: Will Benton wiben...@redhat.com Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:18:01 PM Subject: erlang-jsx about to be retired (Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-04-20)) Dear Erlang folks, (I'm not subscribed to the list so please cc me in replies.) I

Re: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package

2013-12-07 Thread Will Benton
Sorry for any confusion, Jochen. The next step in the process is notifying fedora-devel, which it appears we're doing now. Jochen, would your preferred resolution be to be the primary maintainer (with one or more co-maintainers)? best, wb - Original Message - From: Jochen Schmitt

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-09-12 Thread Will Benton
- Original Message - From: Antoine Gourlay anto...@gourlay.fr To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:22:05 AM Subject: Re: Scala package owner unresponsive Do you have the log output of the failing tests? I

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-09-11 Thread Will Benton
), and disable several tests that failed spuriously (as far as I can tell). But I think the package should be at least as good as the one we had before. Jochen Schmitt, are you willing to update the build in F19 and rawhide with these fixes? - Original Message - From: Will Benton wi

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-09-11 Thread Will Benton
If it's more convenient to import a SRPM (of course it is!), I've made one available at http://freevariable.com/scala - Original Message - From: Will Benton wi...@redhat.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, September 11

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-09-05 Thread Will Benton
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:03:46 AM Subject: Re: Scala package owner unresponsive On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:41:52PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Will Benton wi...@redhat.com

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

2013-08-18 Thread Will Benton
On two related notes, (1) As far as I can tell, the package for Scala 2.9.2 on F19 (2.9.2-2) has broken dependencies; I can't install it via yum on my new F19 install. Is this the case for anyone else? If so, wouldn't it be best to have a working Scala 2.9 package in F19 and introduce 2.10

introducing myself

2011-05-05 Thread Will Benton
Hi all, My name is Will Benton, and I work on grid and cloud stuff at Red Hat. I've been here since Fall 2008, but I've been a Red Hat user since the RHL era (Picasso was the first RHL release I used every day). My pre-Red Hat experience mainly consists of work on compilers, static program