I blame the Golgafrinchans.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 10:30, Leslie Satenstein via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I use 3 languages in human speech, and I have in-house three cultures.
> When we talk of a person and his actions, we say he has good karma.
> Karma is a feeling. Karma
On 21/11/2024 13:06, Davide Caratti wrote:
yes. The problem is in md4_vector() [1], the legacy provider has a
non-NULL pointer and EVP_md4() fetches correctly. However, when
pkcs11-provider is installed,
EVP_DigestInit_ex() fails. I tried this patch [2] on upstream
wpa_supplicant, and it seem to
until there’s a fix?
Kind regards,
Arthur Bols
fas: principis
[0]:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/unable-to-connect-to-wpa2-enterprise-after-upgrading-to-fedora-41/134889
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2326839
--
___
devel
On 05/11/2024 21:39, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 9:33 PM Arthur Bols wrote:
Hi Fabio,
On 31/10/2024 19:38, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi all,
TL;DR: I am planning to orphan rust-eza later today. Be warned - it's
a lot of work to keep up with upstream (~1 release per
ct that's been around since 2017 in some form without
asking other contributors (or the original author of exa) doesn't pass
the smell test for me.
Seriously... https://github.com/eza-community/eza/releases/tag/v0.20.0
The PR mentions dual-licensing, but it's now a mess of only MIT, MIT
On 28/07/2024 23:11, Samuel Sieb wrote:
MDNS works by default. Users don't need to open the port.
It seems you are correct, due to the fact that ports 1025-65535 are open
by default. I must've changed to the default zone to home for my network
when I tried this years ago.
Thanks for the corr
On 28/07/2024 13:20, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28 2024 at 11:37:15 AM +02:00:00, Arthur Bols via devel
wrote:
Aside that this does not contribute to the discussion at all, I believe
it is reasonable to assume that the default firewall rules are strict
enough to not open all ports
On 28/07/2024 11:33, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 10:25 +0200, Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday, while assisting a user with connecting a printer, I noticed
that the default firewall zone on Fedora Workstation is set to
"FedoraWorkstation". This zone
On 28/07/2024 11:20, Björn Persson wrote:
Arthur Bols via devel wrote:
I often run dev servers that I assume
are secure due to the default firewall settings
This practice of blindly assuming that somebody else is protecting you
from your own negligence is a common source of security breaches
ge request to remove these firewall rules
for better security but want to ensure I'm not overlooking anything.
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Arthur Bols
fas: principis
[0]:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firewalld/blob/c2e602b9fa037b10c843f43afbb2d1d3fc9b612a/f
//bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2258358
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.f
;t want to use it.
Thank you, these are valid points that I was mostly unaware of.
1 and 2 (I use a mooltipass, so it's just one extra click) aren't a
problem for me and hopefully I'll never need the 3rd, but I can see how
this could have a big impact on other users.
--
Arthu
while,
enabling 2FA helps A LOT even if used incorrectly (e.g. storing it in
the same keepassxc database).
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fed
a acount...
An important note, the docs [0] should probably mention `fkinit -u
`. It's much easier than using kinit.
[0]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-accounts/user/#pkinit
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
--
___
devel m
On 28/03/2024 12:22, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 6:11 AM Arthur Bols wrote:
This seems reasonable to me. Do we have any packaged themes that need
to be adjusted alongside it?
Thanks for taking a look!
I don't think so. There is nothing breaking in the changelog for themes
greatly appreciated.
Kind regards,
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principisFrom 2d7a2c39be4baee14bc830c9e7fbf0d7480095bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Bols
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:49:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update to 1.1.0 (fedora#2269918)
---
.gitignore | 1 +
kvantum.spec | 84
to their email.
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-o
ndency of power-profiles-daemon.
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/
This is my first time participating in a mailing list as well, but I wanted to
show my support for this.
Thanks for getting the ball rolling!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe
Generally, CIS Benchmarks are only prescriptive and getting near/total
compliance with the benchmark is mainly for those who have host
fleets under some SCAP compliance regime. Nonetheless, picking on the low
hanging fruit such as cron compliance isn't going to drastically improve
the security post
I recall a number of years back a proposed gcc upgrade broke many builds.
This required most maintainers to log in and refactor their source code
against the new gcc (and new gcc options).
I hadn't logged into Fedora for years however I did do my due diligence and
rather quickly logged in and fixe
rilo
grilo-plugins
ifuse
iio-sensor-proxy
libfprint
libglib-testing
libimobiledevice
libpeas
libplist
libportal
libusbmuxd
low-memory-monitor
malcontent
power-profiles-daemon
sloccount
switcheroo-control
totem
totem-pl-parser
umockdev
usbmuxd
I've picked up power-profiles-d
another Ubuntu.
[0]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/#_first
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Cod
me as a co-maintainer.
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-con
On 21/06/2023 06:30, Ryan Lerch wrote:
The Koji web front end is now running a new theme that brings it into
line with the majority of our other devel focused web applications:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/
Looks very good, great work!
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
going on?
Ralf
My build also just failed on i686 with the same error:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102221654
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On 17/01/2023 16:15, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:13 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:18 AM Arthur Bols wrote:
On 17/01/2023 14:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
So bodhi and pagure are at different datacenters with hopefully different
network paths. Could
could review
mooltipass-udev: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160449 .
It's a simple package for the udev rules for mooltipass devices, which
were previously included in the moolticute package.
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
17 8.43.84.4 (8.43.84.4) 215.289 ms 215.232 ms 211.599 ms
18 ip-8-43-86-126.foo.bar (8.43.86.126) 124.226 ms 126.584 ms 142.354 ms
19 proxy14.fedoraproject.org (8.43.85.67) 134.550 ms !X 116.964 ms
!X 121.806 ms !X
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
_
On 17/03/2022 10:49, Matyáš Kroupa wrote:
Hi,
I use wine and steam (and some libraries which are required to run them) with
total of 254 i686 packages.
Matyáš
I'm also using them for wine and steam.
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
re the Fedora 39 release? Should this be postponed to Fedora 40 to
allow for more testing, migration of other tools and more?
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
rmal or friendly is a bit more difficult.
Therefore I understand and agree that non-native English speakers are
given a bit of leeway.
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
review in exchange.
Thanks
Sandro
I took perl-Feature-Compat-Class, the other one was already taken by Petr.
If you have some free time, I'd love to have diff-so-fancy (perl script)
reviewed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150097
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: prin
ork! I use texlive daily and really appreciate it.
I'm not sure if this is helps you, but I compiled a few of my largest
documents (~600 pages in total with lots of math and figures) and
visually compared one of them without any errors.
--
Arthur Bols
fas
seems to have stalled on v3.
I'll probably take another look at it when v3 comes out, but for now I
think copr will do.
[1]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/principis/howdy/
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
devel m
On 3/01/2023 20:21, Onuralp SEZER wrote:
I will gladly take it, and any co-maintainers are welcome as well.
Thank you for your contributions to dlib as well.
Feel free to add me as a co-maintainer. I'm maintaining howdy in copr.
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: prin
n-1.0) AND
BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND MIT AND OFL-1.1 AND CC-BY-3.0
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Condu
Hi all,
I have a perl package (diff-so-fancy) up for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150097
I'd be happy to review something in return.
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 28/11/2022 19:20, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
- rpms/thefuck
Took it since I was a co-admin
- rpms/vim-latex
Took this as well
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2043228
Let me know if you'd like to swap (or do some of them)!
Kind regards,
Arthur
fas: principis
On 3/06/2022 21:46, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
Dear all,
I'm looking to package task (https://taskfile.dev/) for Fedora and
would like to offer
rg/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#Proper_posting_style
--
Arthur Bols
fas/irc: principis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
action),
but doesn't log you in.
Arthur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
also just install any desktop environment you want...
If you don't want to drag windows, try a tiling window manager like i3.
If you like classic Gnome, try Mate.
Arthur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
in desperate need of
a review (and maybe didn't have time to do yours), maybe you could help
them!
Arthur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedor
kages which would ship translations for mo would most
probably also have translations for ro.
So the symlink would probably not be useful.
Arthur
[0] https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_changes.php
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldovan_lan
ue
For the other directories, I sadly don't have time to look into all of
them, and I think I have too little knowledge in this field.
Regards,
Arthur
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033886
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/iso-codes-team/iso-codes/-/blo
Relevant docs:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_encouraging_comaintainers_of_packages
Arthur
On 19/11/2021 03:55, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:10 PM Arthur Bols wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if Seth Jennings (sjenning) is stil active in Fedora? I
se
n irc (principis) or reply to this email if anyone knows
anything. I'm would like to maintain pam-u2f if needed.
Thanks,
Arthur
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024771
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690777
___
dev
appreciate it if you can allay my concerns by letting me know if
switching to using the underlying SFTP protocol for SCP will allow per user
connection limits to be applied which I feel are very important. Hope you
have the answer at hand.
Best regards,
Arthur.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 19:49,
Hi all,
I am claiming qtpass [0] which is currently orphaned.
Kind regards,
Arthur
[0]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qtpass
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
e.
Review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979708
Hi Ankur,
I don't have a package for the moment, but I'll review it.
I think it would be better for me to start with simpler packages anyway. :)
Kind regards,
Arthur
___
de
heavy lifting and sign on as
a co-maintainer to deal with upstream-related issues. The primary
maintainer will then only have to deal with Fedora-related issues.
Arthur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Hi everyone,
You may have seen me by now in the mailing lists or on IRC. Let me
introduce myself. My name is Arthur Bols. I'm a Computer Science student
from Belgium with a strong interest in FOSS and Linux. In 2017 I joined
a student organization which strives to bring Computer Scienc
+1
...and many thanks for providing a very comprehensive rationale.
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 21:47, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:59:54PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Feedback ==
> +1
>
> > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > == Dependencies ==
> > * anaconda: https://g
I much prefer simple things, and referring to the distribution as "Fedora"
does it for me on a few levels.
FNU? Perhaps in the future the Linux kernel may fall out of favour for
something else, hey why not just cut to the eventual chase and call it
systemd-fedora.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 22:21, Al
Thanks also for the nmcli tip, it got me out of a pickle today with RedHat
8. From what I've experienced so far it's well implemented.
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 08:42, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > You can use crudini to man
Too bad NetworkManager persists with the old MS-DOS "INI" file format for
it's configuration files. At least network-scripts was bash script friendly.
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 20:53, Peter Boy wrote:
> With Fedora 33 network configuration is by default persisted in
> /etc/NetworkManager/system-con
"Is there a concern or known issue that will cause systemd-resolved to
not work in your setup?"
I have a ton of experience with sssd and before that samba winbind so know
the benefits and limitations of this software stack well. I'm new to
systemd-resolved but have been reading the lively Fedora th
"the system administrator will need to install and configure
sssd to replace it after the update. Even when this is not done, the
only visible affect will be slower resolution of named service queries
due to a missing cache."
I use nscd on a few application servers that point to unreliable DNS
ser
Hi,
I will be updating gsl to 2.4 in Rawhide on Monday and will be
rebuilding dependent packages.
You can check bugzilla[0] for some tracking info.
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463022
Cheers,
--
Arthur Mello
Software Engineer
Red Hat
ame...@redhat.com
l make the original
MariaDB RPM cleaner.
Arthur.
On 24 January 2013 13:05, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 17:49 -0800, Andrew Rist wrote:
>> but the database choice for Fedora should only focus on the merits and
>> the quality of the MySQL code
>
> You may have read
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:28:55PM -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618349
>>
>> The bug is blocking my ability, or at least my willingness to upgrade
>> to F
Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618349
The bug is blocking my ability, or at least my willingness to upgrade
to F14. I would appreciate some assistance so that I can finally do
the upgrade.
--
Fedora 13
(www.pembo13.com)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
I apologize for interrupting this tread. I shall take my leave.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:58:53 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>2010/9/20 Micha? Piotrowski :
>>> Ok, so maybe it's time to setup Fedora "backports" repo for these that
>>> wants new and shiny Firefox 4, PostgreSQL 9 or whatever with big
>>> number.
>
2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski :
> 2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi :
>> As the concept of using third party repositories (both as packagers and as
>> users) grows, this interdependence will grow.
>
> Ok, so maybe it's time to setup Fedora "backports" repo for these that
> wants new and shiny Firefox 4, Post
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:13:42 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> No, I'm not advocating PgSQL 9 for F14, however, it shouldn't be so
>> far-fetched that Fedora could have any software at any time.
>
> A Fedora update policy is being
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michel Alexandre Salim writes:
>> Note: I don't think Mark was proposing to do the packaging work himself.
>> But it'd be great if whoever picks this up (Michał, are you a packager?)
>> could reply to this thread, thus avoiding duplication of wo
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:01 AM, FlorianFesti wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 09:05 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> (I don't have a strong opinion on whether the data format is RPM or
>> repodata myself; maybe just a slight preference for the latter; the
>> most important thing in my mind is to come to rough
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:28 PM, James Antill wrote:
> Ubuntu recently got high praise from LWN for "Software Center" in 10.10
> betas. It doesn't use PackageKit at all AFAICS (no PackageKit packages
> are installed in my VM). It integrates tightly with apt (you know, like
> showing package histo
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 14:17 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
>> Sure, I understand where you're coming from. As you see from
>> app-install schema version 1 it really was least common denominator.
>> But version 2, which is in progress now, fe
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:39 AM, James Antill wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 15:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> On 7 September 2010 15:23, James Antill wrote:
>> > Are you having any discussions about applications like postfix, or is
>> > version 2 going to be just GUI stuff?
>>
>> Postfix is
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:03:17PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> > Where, keep in mind, "slow" is defined as twice a year, right?
>> Yes.
>
> I think this is a remarkable definition of slow. Especial
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 15:56 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:26:27PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> > Maybe I was too long winded, or failed to communicate my point: a
>> > stable
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:26:27PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> Maybe I was too long winded, or failed to communicate my point: a
>> stable (bug fix only updates, slow feature release), strongly FOSS,
>> strongly
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 09:58 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 08/30/2010 10:50 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> > The attention to freedom is not unique. The attention to upstream is
>> > invisible to users.
&g
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/30/10 9:50 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Jesse Keating
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Jesse Keating
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/30/10 1:33 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> Is this still unique?
>
> I believe it is, particularly with our attention to freedom and upstream
> relations
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Jesse Keating
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/30/10 8:56 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Gerald Henriksen
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:11:06 +02
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 23:56 -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Gerald Henriksen
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:11:06 +0200, you wrote:
>> >
>> >>A ty
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:11:06 +0200, you wrote:
>
>>A typical developer wants the dependencies of the software they are
>>working on to be _very_ up to date - probably not the upstream
>>development version, but the upstream maintenance ve
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Sven Lankes said:
>> Also - and this is a question that I have asked myself and others a
>> couple of times - if you could implement Fedora the way you want: What
>> unique selling points are left for Fedora? "Fedora is Ubunt
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>
> "Thomas Janssen" wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 08/28/2010 09:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
> The cynic in me
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Thomas Janssen
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/28/2010 09:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Jesse Keating wrote:
The cynic in me would expect that the people who want
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/28/2010 09:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> The cynic in me would expect that the people who want something different
>>> than the fire hose we have now are sile
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN... http://start.fedoraproject.org/ is using a
> Google Search Box... YOU DON'T HAVE THE CODE TO PLAY WITH IT OR ANYTHING...
> With "Fedora's engine" I'm giving you the chance of having something more
> "opensource
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Chris Adams wrote:
>> sendmail has always worked out of the box for some things, including
>> sending mail from local programs to remote email addresses
>
> I thought this was a speed trip to spamhaus' lists (the `localhost'
> part I've found)
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:04 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:09 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>> What more do you want an MTA to do at install? It was decided a long
>> time ago that the MTA shouldn't listen for remote SMTP connections by
>> default. Pretty much any other thing
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:31:58PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> > Useful information is being generated and then lost. That shouldn't happen.
>> This is not a sudden realization, there are bugs open about this f
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:25:18PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> > We're going in circles. I already said that I think the best fix for
>> > this is to replace sendmail with an MTA which works 'out of th
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:59:06PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> >> 1. Not everyone uses
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:00 -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>
>> > I think that makes sense if we're talking about adding a default, but
>> > taking one out - especially something that's been default in al
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 01:14 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 08/27/2010 12:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > That wasn't the question. The question was what is the benefit of not
>> > having one. Is it simply that it saves 1.6MB of disk
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic
>> > configuration tool. gnome-display-properties should have a "set as
>> > default" butt
Thanks Dave,
Here's one borrowed from the music industry.
mastering (or starting with R - remastering)
I've used this concept successfully for commercial orgs during their
release finalizing stages.
Arthur.
On 18 February 2010 10:19, David wrote:
> On 15 February 2010 11:19, Ar
rolling - as in the song - rolling, rolling, rolling, rawhide!
On 15 February 2010 11:06, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 09:37 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> Of course, if wanna keep the "gold" name for the official release path,
> could rename other and use below..
>
> bronze -
96 matches
Mail list logo
