Look at the mail footer:
"To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org"
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
There was also
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver which
was proposed for F22, but deferred twice and eventually dropped.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:55 PM, James Antill
wrote:
#topic #694 Packaging guidelines for application independence
.fpc 694
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/694
I had been hoping to attend the meeting to discuss this change, but
it's been on the meeting agenda for five months now,
I see in the file list:
%{_libdir}/*.so.*
I've lost count of how many problems we've had from unannounced soname
bumps recently. It's going to keep happening so long as our packaging
guidelines continue to allow this construction.
Anyway, the only thing better than one soname bump is a seco
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:49 PM, Randy Barlow
wrote:
It does not appear to be blocked currently.
There is a bug. Yesterday it was red and said tests failed; the result
changed itself. I see there are many more test results now than there
were yesterday. It looks like the tests had not finish
I have an update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/epiphany-3.26.6-1.fc27
that is blocked due to some harmless translation-related warnings from
desktop-file-validate. I'm not the translation police and do not plan
to make any changes to the desktop file.
* Who can help unblock
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:26 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
Alternatively, if you want to strengthen the system crypto policy,
then it should not apply to web browsers at all. Or web browsers
should automatically use the weak policy. (We'd need the weak policy
in glib-networking, too.)
Read
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
regarding the strong crypto change in Fedora28 [0], we have identified
few (usually internal) sites which break under firefox or other tools.
The main reason for this breakage is that these sites only support
Diffie-Hellman with 102
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz
wrote:
gnome-desktop3 was updated a week ago to 3.27.90, which bumped ABI
from
.so.12 to .so.17. AFAICS no notice was given, nor am I sure that this
was even noticed by the maintainer, because once again:
%{_libdir}/lib*.so.*
I have rebuilt
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
I am currently reporting my pan-crashing-Wayland crashing issue on
gnome.org---but in the true Heisenbug fashion it stopped crashing, so
I can't reproduce it now. It was crashing almost every time I used
the pan newsreader (the three cr
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:39 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
If any logs or monitoring tools would be helpful, I'll be happy to
help.
Please see my earlier post in this thread regarding how to get a
stacktrace out of coredumpctl. If you post an issue report with a
stacktrace at https://gitlab.gnome.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
Can anyone suggest ways of debugging this?
Run coredumpctl to see what processes crashed. There should be at least
a gnome-shell crash, maybe also a gnome-session crash, maybe also an
XWayland crash. Usually only the gnome-shell and g
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
Strange only is that looks like this bug already is known more than
year!
Looks like two years... I followed the chain of links in the Red Hat
bugs, which claim this is already reported as
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7621
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
If it will be no new actions to the end of this week I'm going to
raise FESCo ticket to takeover at least libxml2.
Yes, libxml2 is security-critical; we can't wait this long to apply
security patches. The Fedora package maintainer needs t
Thanks, Kevin. Knowing when the updates are actually going out adds
important context to this discussion.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 7:30 AM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
I don't see how this is helpful.
Kevin has a point here. Clearly what we have now is, in practice, not
working as intended.
Micha
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
I thought for some reason that all updates marked as security were
automatically urgent, maybe I'm misremembering, but if not it might
be good to do that as a RFE that way all security updates go out non
batched.
Most security updates are
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Florian Weimer
wrote:
How is the user experience for installing these kernel modules today,
anyway? Does it need specialized knowledge to turn of Secure Boot in
the firmware?
If yes, this means that those users are pretty advanced and are
likely able to de
Oh boy. :)
Does anyone know if the fallback is working properly? Because if so,
then everyone is happy and we don't need to be having this discussion.
Sounds like there's a good chance that's the case. (I don't have an
nvidia card to test myself.)
If the fallback is not working, then FESCo w
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:41 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
Pretty sure the last testing I did with the details form Hans's
blog[0] the behaviour was that if the nvidia driver failed then the
nouveau driver was a fallback (rather than the older instructions
that totally blacklisted it leaving no GPU
Hi,
Something changed yesterday and now the entire GNOME packager group is
being automatically CCed to all GNOME-related bugs in Red Hat Bugzilla.
There's no way to opt-out in Bugzilla preferences, at least not that I
have found.
Can someone undo this change please? It's not manageable, and
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
I bet this is related to the "point of contact in bugzilla" part in
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/6OIOUQGVZV4P7ECQEMNDHBLVBRF3SJLB/
although this is a side-effect other than bugzi
Hi,
Since yesterday I'm getting a huge number of messages about broken
dependencies in packages that I don't care about. Anybody else
experiencing this?
Seems I'm being aliased to, at a minimum,
poppler-ow...@fedoraproject.org and empathy-ow...@fedoraproject.org...
plus several more.
Mich
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam
folder. Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you, not the
list?
They're being sent to 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org (whatever that
is). I can see in the mail
Hi,
Do the list admins have any plans to combat the spammers that are
spoofing Kevin Fenzi to bypass the moderation queue?
Could we please at least hold his messages for moderation? Maybe he
could manually approve his own messages, as annoying as that would be.
Though I don't know what we wo
Hey Kevin,
Thanks for your detailed response. I usually try not to read or write
long mails, but I made an exception this time. :)
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
Bastien Nocera wrote:
Why do we care about FHS compliance inside a Flatpak?
Because the proprietary dir
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
