On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 10:18:48PM +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Hello there,
It seems that guile-gnome-platform should be unblocked as well.
Hello there,
I wish to take ownership of gnusim8085 and gwave.
Can you please grant me the Take Ownership for the respective devel
branch
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The
Hello there,
It seems that guile-gnome-platform should be unblocked as well.
thank you
Chitlesh
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH
chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Each release, before branching, we block
Hm, a bad thing has happened during my vacation, I haven't noticed my
package cdrdao/gcdmaster is in the list and now I have a FTBFS problem.
So I can take these packages if it's not too late yet:
libgnomeuimm26
libgnomemm26
gnome-vfsmm26
Is it possible to unblock these packages somehow easily
Honza Horak (hho...@redhat.com) said:
Hm, a bad thing has happened during my vacation, I haven't noticed my
package cdrdao/gcdmaster is in the list and now I have a FTBFS problem.
So I can take these packages if it's not too late yet:
libgnomeuimm26
libgnomemm26
gnome-vfsmm26
Is it
Am Mittwoch, 20 Juli 2011 15:28:05 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
BN Orphan: libglfw
BN hosts3d requires libglfw.so.2.6
BN hosts3d requires libglfw-devel = 2.6-6.fc15
BN hosts3d-sampler requires libglfw.so.2.6
BN taoframework-glfw requires libglfw = 2.6-6.fc15
hosts3d can't be in after
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:29:40AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 7/26/11 8:48 AM, Till Maas wrote:
I hereby propose to change this in the future and explicitly CC
comaintainers to make them aware that their package is orphaned.
This can easily be done by just mailing
On 7/28/11 9:02 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:29:40AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 7/26/11 8:48 AM, Till Maas wrote:
I hereby propose to change this in the future and explicitly CC
comaintainers to make them aware that their package is orphaned.
This can easily be done by
Marc Grimme (gri...@atix.de) said:
I've done this but could not take over the ownership for Fedora-devel. It's
still orphaned there.
Correct, because the packages have already been blocked as stated in the
mail.
I also got reminders from rawhide that the dependent packages could not be
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Fabian Deutsch fabian.deut...@gmx.dewrote:
Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 11:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
Fabian Deutsch (fabian.deut...@gmx.de) said:
It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost:
I can take
Orphan link-grammar
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Peter Robinson
Gesendet: 27.07.11 10:09 Uhr
An: Development discussions related to Fedora
Betreff: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Fabian Deutsch fabian.deut...@gmx.dewrote:
Am
- Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:56:36PM +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
- Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Orphan comoonics-base-py
comaintained by: elcody02
I'm co maintaining this package and it is required for the packages
Hello,
It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost:
I can take
Orphan link-grammar
- fabian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
- Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The following packages are
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:56:36PM +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
- Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
Fabian Deutsch (fabian.deut...@gmx.de) said:
It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost:
I can take
Orphan link-grammar
It's not a matter of can you; you need to go to pkgdb to claim it. (Sorry
if the original mail didn't make this clear.)
Bill
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 03:51:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
Just wondering: Did the comaintainers get a copy of this mail?
Only inasmuch as they're subscribed to devel@.
I hereby propose to change this in the future and explicitly CC
On 7/26/11 8:48 AM, Till Maas wrote:
I hereby propose to change this in the future and explicitly CC
comaintainers to make them aware that their package is orphaned.
This can easily be done by just mailing
package-ow...@fedoraproject.org It will get to all co-maintainers.
--
Jesse Keating
Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 11:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
Fabian Deutsch (fabian.deut...@gmx.de) said:
It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost:
I can take
Orphan link-grammar
It's not a matter of can you; you need to go to pkgdb to claim it. (Sorry
if the
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The
2011/7/20 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The following packages are
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:28:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:28:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to
I'll take xmltooling and opensaml (rawhide branches).
I have no intention to get ownership of EPEL branches.
Regards,
Guido
--
Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com
Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA)
Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18)
Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337 DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278
Hi,
Orphan whowatch
I've taken this one.
Rich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Bill Nottingham venit, vidit, dixit 20.07.2011 21:28:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The following packages
I'll take slim.
Regards, Pavel Zhukov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 15:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan igraph
Since I took the python binding I guess I should take this one to :)
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Orphan rubygem-rcov
Oh, missed that one. I'll definitely take that.
--CJD
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:41:28PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
Orphan rubygem-rcov
Oh, missed that one. I'll definitely take that.
--CJD
Never mind. It has been snatched up already.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:28:05PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The
32 matches
Mail list logo
