Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-24 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package emacs-common-proofgeneral (fails to build) Since coq (which I maintain) needs this, I updated it to the latest upstream version and rebuilt. Upstream has dropped support for XEmacs in the latest releases, which means I'll have to

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. Took: asylum gnokii gnome-phone-manager Comaintainers or more interested potential owners w

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-19 Thread Michael Schwendt
The following three have been orphaned in pkgdb today, which makes it possible to grab ownership: archmage -- Extensible reader/decompiler of files in CHM format gtick -- A graphical metronome software python-chm -- Python package for CHM files handling -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

cmucl Was: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-19 Thread Anthony Green
...@sylvestre.me, gr...@redhat.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 1:51:24 PM Subject: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18 Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are cu

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-19 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> Package qtparted (fails to build) > > That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting > the 0.6.0 to build is more promising? Even a svn checkout failed to build. It looks like it hasn't been updated for parted 3

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-19 Thread Richard Shaw
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Michael J Gruber > wrote: >> >>> Package qtparted (fails to build) >> >> That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting >> the 0.6.0 to build is more promising? > > I'm taking a shot at

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-19 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> Package qtparted (fails to build) > > That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting > the 0.6.0 to build is more promising? I'm taking a shot at it. It looks like 0.5.0 is the current stable version, we'll see

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-19 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 13:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package gpsdrive (orphan) Taken. Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty n...@redhat.com nor Safety." -- Benja

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-19 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 06:56 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 07/17/2012 10:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >gtick -- A graphical metronome software > > I have added myself to this package. ditto (as co-maint) Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purcha

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-18 Thread Michael J Gruber
> Package qtparted (fails to build) That one is at 0.4.5 in the repo and at 0.6.0 upstream. Maybe getting the 0.6.0 to build is more promising? Michael -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-18 Thread José Matos
On a related note I have orphaned ifplugd and I suggest it to be retired from F-18 I took its maintenance when networkmanager was not reliable enough for my needs but that time is long gone and only inertia insured that it stayed alive. Regards, -- José Matos -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-18 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package hexter-dssi (orphan) > comaintained by: oget I picked the above. I always thought it was mine, and got surprised to see it orphaned. Best, Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapro

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
Anyone with interest in package "echoping"? It's been unmaintained since 2008 and I really don't understand how it could survive so far. | Echoping is a small program to test (approximatively) performances of a | remote host by sending TCP "echo" (or other protocol, such as HTTP) | packets. http:

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-17 Thread Brendan Jones
On 07/17/2012 10:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: gtick -- A graphical metronome software I have added myself to this package. regards Brendan (bsjones) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-17 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
> Anyone interested in > > gnusim8085 -- A graphical simulator for Intel 8085 microprocessor I would be interested in taking gnusim8085. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-17 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:51:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently > orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. > > The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If > you have a need

[ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-17 Thread Bill Nottingham
Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any o