Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
errata-xmlrpc errata-xml...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
errata-xmlrpc errata-xml...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Milos Malik mma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |VERIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Milos Malik mma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|qe-baseos-security@redhat.c |mma...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Milos Malik mma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mma...@redhat.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Miroslav Grepl mgr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
errata-xmlrpc errata-xml...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Karel Srot ks...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ks...@redhat.com
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
--- Comment #11 from RHEL Product and Program Management pm-r...@redhat.com
---
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Product Management has
requested further review of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Walsh dwa...@redhat.com 2012-04-09 16:27:25 EDT
---
We seem to dontaudit all of these in Fedora.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
--- Comment #9 from Erik M Jacobs ejac...@redhat.com 2012-04-05 14:18:31 EDT
---
Looks like it works.
[root@atlas ~]$ cat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
--- Comment #8 from Miroslav Grepl mgr...@redhat.com 2012-04-02 06:54:01 EDT
---
Could you test it only with this rule
allow
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
--- Comment #3 from Erik M Jacobs ejac...@redhat.com 2012-03-31 12:45:49 EDT
---
[root@shrugged ~]$ rpm -qa | grep selinux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
--- Comment #2 from Erik M Jacobs ejac...@redhat.com 2012-03-31 12:45:29 EDT
---
OK, looking at the topic of the bug, it says
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Erik M Jacobs ejac...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
--- Comment #4 from Erik M Jacobs ejac...@redhat.com 2012-03-31 12:48:03 EDT
---
With the latest versions of the policy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Erik M Jacobs ejac...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Erik M Jacobs ejac...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
--- Comment #7 from Erik M Jacobs ejac...@redhat.com 2012-03-31 18:47:31 EDT
---
So the violation is because of a read shadow
19 matches
Mail list logo
