Re: [EPEL-devel] Ansible in EL7

2018-04-11 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > James Hogarth wrote: >> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible >> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL >> policy is not to conflict. >> >> I was surprised just

Re: [EPEL-devel] Ansible in EL7

2018-04-10 Thread James Hogarth
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 01:13 James Hogarth, wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote: > >> James Hogarth wrote: >> > I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible >> > from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in

Re: [EPEL-devel] Ansible in EL7

2018-04-10 Thread James Hogarth
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote: > James Hogarth wrote: > > I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible > > from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL > > policy is not to conflict. > > > > I was surprised just

Re: [EPEL-devel] Ansible in EL7

2018-04-10 Thread Todd Zullinger
James Hogarth wrote: > I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible > from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL > policy is not to conflict. > > I was surprised just now to see ansible 2.5.0 on a test centos system, > when it wasn't in extras,

[EPEL-devel] Ansible in EL7

2018-04-10 Thread James Hogarth
Hi all, I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL policy is not to conflict. I was surprised just now to see ansible 2.5.0 on a test centos system, when it wasn't in extras, and on a little bit of a