On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> James Hogarth wrote:
>> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
>> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
>> policy is not to conflict.
>>
>> I was surprised just
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 01:13 James Hogarth, wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote:
>
>> James Hogarth wrote:
>> > I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
>> > from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote:
> James Hogarth wrote:
> > I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
> > from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
> > policy is not to conflict.
> >
> > I was surprised just
James Hogarth wrote:
> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
> policy is not to conflict.
>
> I was surprised just now to see ansible 2.5.0 on a test centos system,
> when it wasn't in extras,
Hi all,
I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
policy is not to conflict.
I was surprised just now to see ansible 2.5.0 on a test centos system,
when it wasn't in extras, and on a little bit of a