Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2016-11-08 at 04:04 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> PackageKit-yum
>> never used RPM groups, always comps
>
> So, (if we want the package have a group ) all packages should be
> enumerated in comps, or not ? .
Yes (in comps)
-- Rex
On Ter, 2016-11-08 at 04:04 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> PackageKit-yum
> never used RPM groups, always comps
So, (if we want the package have a group ) all packages should be
enumerated in comps, or not ? .
Also we have a poor support of groups in dnf, even querytags [1]
haven't group tag to
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I don't see how the text you quoted support this in any way. None of the
>> KDE tools support the Group tag. (They never did.)
>
> That's not true. They currently do not with the Fedora backend, but in
> the past they
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> yeah, so the group tag shouldn't be obsolete , we should use it as
>> fallback .
>
> I don't see how the text you quoted support this in any way. None of the KDE
> tools support the Group tag.
On Sáb, 2016-11-05 at 04:45 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > yeah, so the group tag shouldn't be obsolete , we should use it as
> > fallback .
> I don't see how the text you quoted support this in any way. None of
> the KDE
> tools support the Group tag. (They never did.)
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> yeah, so the group tag shouldn't be obsolete , we should use it as
> fallback .
I don't see how the text you quoted support this in any way. None of the KDE
tools support the Group tag. (They never did.)
Kevin Kofler
___
On Sex, 2016-10-28 at 00:23 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Many thanks by your reply, yes or creterepo could use appdata
> > directly,
> > makes sense improve createrepo with appdata, btw I noticie, apper
> > (kde
> > software manager) on Fedora 24 fails on search groups
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Many thanks by your reply, yes or creterepo could use appdata directly,
> makes sense improve createrepo with appdata, btw I noticie, apper (kde
> software manager) on Fedora 24 fails on search groups with:
> "SearchGroups not supported by backend" , what tools we have to
On Qui, 2016-10-27 at 14:07 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On jueves, 27 de octubre de 2016 5:39:20 PM CDT Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Qui, 2016-10-27 at 09:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 17:24 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On jueves, 27 de octubre de 2016 5:39:20 PM CDT Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Qui, 2016-10-27 at 09:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 17:24 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hello, I'd like understand how groups of package are now detect ,
> > > specially in 3rd repo
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 17:39 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Qui, 2016-10-27 at 09:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 17:24 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello, I'd like understand how groups of package are now detect ,
> > > specially in 3rd repo
Hi,
On Qui, 2016-10-27 at 09:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 17:24 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Hello, I'd like understand how groups of package are now detect ,
> > specially in 3rd repo packages which can't use comps.xml.
> Sure they can. Third party repos can
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 17:24 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello, I'd like understand how groups of package are now detect ,
> specially in 3rd repo packages which can't use comps.xml.
Sure they can. Third party repos can provide comps, and all Fedora
packaging tools will use it. RPMFusion, for
Hello, I'd like understand how groups of package are now detect ,
specially in 3rd repo packages which can't use comps.xml.
Thanks !
Forwarded Message
From: Sérgio Basto
To: packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: why the
14 matches
Mail list logo