Fwd: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2020-12-23 Thread Oliver Weinmann via devel
Hi, I'm also trying to build latest ceph on arm32 under CentOS 7 (odroid-hc2) and it keeps failing for various reasons. Main reason seems to be the lack of: devtoolset-8-gcc-8.3.1-3.1.el7.src.rpm A very helpful and friendly member of the centos mailing list pointed me to an earlier version

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-10 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Rather predictably this has broken libvirt on i686 and armv7hl (ie. 32 bit arches): DEBUG util.py:439:- package libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-4.10.0-1.fc30.i686 requires libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-rbd = 4.10.0-1.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:439:

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-06 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 12/6/18 7:04 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > >> And the other active maintainer (branto) and I don't have cycles to >> devote to keeping (any part of) it building on 32-bit archs. > > But people can always send patches. ;-) If someone else would like to take over as maintainer, I'm happy to

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-06 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 12/5/18 9:50 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Kaleb, > > Firstly the title is misleading as there was no heads up, a heads up > is notice before you actually push the change, not when you do the > change. I suggest you take this up with branto. He's the one who built it without 32-bit archs

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Peter Robinson
Kaleb, Firstly the title is misleading as there was no heads up, a heads up is notice before you actually push the change, not when you do the change. > Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl archs > starting in fedora-30/rawhide. > > The upstream project doesn't

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Tomasz Torcz
“Client bits” also means stuff needed for accessing file-system interface of Ceph: – nfs-ganesha-ceph.x86_64 – ceph-fuse and for some users – the rados gateway bits: – nfs-ganesha-rgw.x86_64 - ceph-radosgw.x86_64 -- Tomasz Torcz

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Forgot about librados, so there's actually a much bigger list: # dnf repoquery -q --whatrequires 'librados.so.2()(64bit)' ceph-common-1:12.2.8-1.fc29.x86_64 ceph-common-1:12.2.9-1.fc29.x86_64 ceph-radosgw-1:12.2.8-1.fc29.x86_64 ceph-radosgw-1:12.2.9-1.fc29.x86_64 ceph-test-1:12.2.8-1.fc29.x86_64

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 02:31:10PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:45:19AM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 > > > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > > > > >> W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:45:19AM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 > > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > > >> W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > >> > >>> Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:02:41 +0100 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:45, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > > On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 > >> Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > >> > >>> W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > >>> >

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:45, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 >> Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> >>> W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: >>> Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 12/5/18 8:34 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > >> W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: >> >>> Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl >>> archs starting in fedora-30/rawhide. >> >>> The upstream

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:23:49 +0100 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > > > Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl > > archs starting in fedora-30/rawhide. > > > The upstream project doesn't support it. The armv7hl

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 05.12.2018 o 14:14, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY pisze: > Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl archs > starting in fedora-30/rawhide. > The upstream project doesn't support it. The armv7hl builders don't have > enough memory (or address space) to build some components.

[HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

2018-12-05 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
Ceph 14.x.x (Nautilus) will no longer be built on i686 and armv7hl archs starting in fedora-30/rawhide. The upstream project doesn't support it. The armv7hl builders don't have enough memory (or address space) to build some components. And the other active maintainer (branto) and I don't have