Re: [Heads-up] libical 3.0.0 to reach rawhide, replacing libical-glib

2017-11-16 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:27:28 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > Hi, > the sum of changes is part of the release notes, which can be found > here: > https://github.com/libical/libical/releases Would be great, if such a document were included within the package. > > vcal_manager.c: In function

Re: [Heads-up] libical 3.0.0 to reach rawhide, replacing libical-glib

2017-11-13 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 10:01 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Orage (the Xfce calendar app) is also broken if you have time to take a > look: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512302 > https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13997 Hi, sure, I'll reply on the Red Hat bug.

Re: [Heads-up] libical 3.0.0 to reach rawhide, replacing libical-glib

2017-11-13 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 01:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Dunno yet what's the reason. Haven't had a look at it except for unpacking > libical-devel in hope that its %doc section would contain a file that sums > up the API changes. No such file in there. And the "Using Libical" guide > claims

Re: [Heads-up] libical 3.0.0 to reach rawhide, replacing libical-glib

2017-11-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:04:55 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > The upgrade seems to be API incompatible, so more than rebuilding > > dependencies is necessary. > > Hi, > that's true. libical upstream removed some deprecated symbols, most > notably icaltimetype::is_utc. Dunno yet what's the

Re: [Heads-up] libical 3.0.0 to reach rawhide, replacing libical-glib

2017-11-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 11/13/2017 06:04 AM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 14:47 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> The upgrade seems to be API incompatible, so more than rebuilding >> dependencies is necessary. > > Hi, > that's true. libical upstream removed some deprecated symbols, most > notably

Re: [Heads-up] libical 3.0.0 to reach rawhide, replacing libical-glib

2017-11-13 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 14:47 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > The upgrade seems to be API incompatible, so more than rebuilding > dependencies is necessary. Hi, that's true. libical upstream removed some deprecated symbols, most notably icaltimetype::is_utc. It's replaced with

Re: [Heads-up] libical 3.0.0 to reach rawhide, replacing libical-glib

2017-11-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 01 Nov 2017 12:26:12 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > Hello, > I'd like to give a heads up about a plan to update libical to its 3.0.0 > release in rawhide once I figure out some details about its build. This > release also obsoletes libical-glib package, the project had been added > into

[Heads-up] libical 3.0.0 to reach rawhide, replacing libical-glib

2017-11-01 Thread Milan Crha
Hello, I'd like to give a heads up about a plan to update libical to its 3.0.0 release in rawhide once I figure out some details about its build. This release also obsoletes libical-glib package, the project had been added into libical itself. I currently plan to push the update on