Thanks, pulled in upstream, build is issued will go out tomorrow
Dennis
On mar, 2013-03-19 at 13:07 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> While this doesn't solve unicode-releated problems with /etc/os-release
> or /etc/fedora-release, for example, it does mean that we won't have
> problems with parsing th
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> While this doesn't solve unicode-releated problems with /etc/os-release
> or /etc/fedora-release, for example, it does mean that we won't have
> problems with parsing this through shell scripts, which we do quite
> often.
>
> This uses /Punctua
While this doesn't solve unicode-releated problems with /etc/os-release
or /etc/fedora-release, for example, it does mean that we won't have
problems with parsing this through shell scripts, which we do quite
often.
This uses /Punctuation apostrophe/, U+2019, which is the preferred
unicode charact
On 19/03/13 08:57 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
While this doesn't solve unicode-releated problems with /etc/os-release
or /etc/fedora-release, for example, it does mean that we won't have
problems with parsing this through shell scripts, which we do quite
often.
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones
+1: the d
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 11:57 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> While this doesn't solve unicode-releated problems with /etc/os-release
> or /etc/fedora-release, for example, it does mean that we won't have
> problems with parsing this through shell scripts, which we do quite
> often.
>
> Signed-off-by: P
While this doesn't solve unicode-releated problems with /etc/os-release
or /etc/fedora-release, for example, it does mean that we won't have
problems with parsing this through shell scripts, which we do quite
often.
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones
---
fedora-release.spec | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 ins
