On 10. 03. 20 19:16, Tim Flink wrote:
I was under the impression that the python-versions check wasn't needed
going forward. Did I misunderstand something?
Technically, it is not needed for Fedora 32+ unless people go and push serious
regressions. However we monitor rawhide pretty closely and
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 01:03:53 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 03. 20 0:29, Tim Flink wrote:
> > If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply to this
> > thread.
>
> Hello Tim.
>
> I have 3 questions.
>
> 1) On what level of Fedora leadership was this decision made (and
> where
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:37:33 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:31 PM Tim Flink wrote:
> > In the short term, there is a Jenkins instance which is running
> > rpminspect. Rpminspect includes tests which are effectively the
> > same as rpmlint and rpmgrill which removes the need
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 11:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:04:20PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > > On 07. 03. 20 0:29, Tim Flink wrote:
> > > > If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply
> > It's not a direct response to your question, but one important fact is that
> > our beefy machines in Fedora Infrastructure are out of warranty now (and
> > replacing them would cost a lot of money, I assume). That's one of the
> > major reasons why they won't be migrated to the new datacenter
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:04:20PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 07. 03. 20 0:29, Tim Flink wrote:
> > > If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply to this thread.
> >
> > Hello Tim.
> >
> > I have 3 questions.
> >
>
> I'll
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:31 AM Tim Flink wrote:
> ---
> What does this mean for me?
> ---
>
> If you're not a packager, you will probably not notice the shutdown.
>
> If you are a packager, this will affect some of the results that you
> currently
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:38 AM Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:31 PM Tim Flink wrote:
> > In the short term, there is a Jenkins instance which is running
> > rpminspect. Rpminspect includes tests which are effectively the same as
> > rpmlint and rpmgrill which removes the need to
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 03. 20 0:29, Tim Flink wrote:
> > If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply to this thread.
>
> Hello Tim.
>
> I have 3 questions.
>
I'll selectively pick just the questions I want to reply to and leave the
rest to Tim
On 07. 03. 20 0:29, Tim Flink wrote:
If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply to this thread.
Hello Tim.
I have 3 questions.
1) On what level of Fedora leadership was this decision made (and where can I
read about it)?
2) Why are we removing something that arguably has a
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:31 PM Tim Flink wrote:
> In the short term, there is a Jenkins instance which is running
> rpminspect. Rpminspect includes tests which are effectively the same as
> rpmlint and rpmgrill which removes the need to run them.
For packages with a .rpmlintrc file in the git
This is something that has been coming for quite a while now
and while it was discussed among QA and Infra, there hasn't been
enough communication with the rest of Fedora. For that, I apologize.
Taskotron has been in maintenance-only mode for a couple of years now
pending a replacement of some
12 matches
Mail list logo
