> Sandro writes:
> That aside, having the document linked in the packaging guidelines is
> a big step towards letting packagers know of its existence.
I just wanted to point out that the packaging guidelines have pointed
users to the document for quite some time (early 2019) in this
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 9:12 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Stephen Gallagher:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
> >>
> >> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that
> >> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place,
>
On 28-09-2023 21:12, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Stephen Gallagher:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that I’ve
been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place, sometimes the
documentation is
* Stephen Gallagher:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>>
>> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that
>> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place,
>> sometimes the documentation is obsolete, or it’s someone’s blog
* Mattia Verga via devel:
> Il 27/09/23 19:01, Stephen Gallagher ha scritto:
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>>> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that
>>> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place,
>>> sometimes
Il 27/09/23 19:01, Stephen Gallagher ha scritto:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that
>> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place,
>> sometimes the documentation is obsolete, or
On 27-09-2023 19:01, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that I’ve
been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place, sometimes the
documentation is obsolete, or it’s
On Wed, Sep 27 2023 at 12:52:17 PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell
wrote:
You have 5 years of excellent documentation by Florian and others to
catch up on! :-)
Random compliment: this documentation is indeed quite good.
Upstream freedesktop-sdk and GNOME build flags are based on Fedora's
because
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that
> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place, sometimes
> the documentation is obsolete, or it’s someone’s blog post, etc. I’ve been
>
I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit
that I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the
place, sometimes the documentation is obsolete, or it’s someone’s
blog post, etc. I’ve been surprised again and again there’s a macro
for this or that which
On 9/27/23 12:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:22:04AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
>> This is the first time I’ve heard of buildflags.md; where might I find this
>> file?
>
> $ ls -l -h /usr/share/doc/redhat-rpm-config/buildflags.md
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 28K Feb 28 2023
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:22:04AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> This is the first time I’ve heard of buildflags.md; where might I find this
> file?
$ ls -l -h /usr/share/doc/redhat-rpm-config/buildflags.md
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 28K Feb 28 2023
/usr/share/doc/redhat-rpm-config/buildflags.md
On 9/27/23 12:22, Ron Olson wrote:
> This is the first time I’ve heard of buildflags.md; where might I find this
> file?
It is distributed with redhat-rpm-config as part of the documentation of build
flags.
You can see the rawhide version here:
This is the first time I’ve heard of buildflags.md; where might I find
this file?
On 26 Sep 2023, at 12:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
redhat-rpm-config-267-1.fc40 activates the first phase of compiler
flags
to avoid regressions in the Fedora C99 port. Implicit ints and
implicit
function
redhat-rpm-config-267-1.fc40 activates the first phase of compiler flags
to avoid regressions in the Fedora C99 port. Implicit ints and implicit
function declarations will be rejected by default. The recommended way
to opt out is to set %build_type_safety_c to 0. See the buildflags.md
15 matches
Mail list logo
