On 08/21/2013 03:09 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Tadej Janež
wrote:
I'll fill a bug against plplot.
By the way, plplotd.pc lists quite a few things in its Libs: line --
without having a deeper look I think chances are that at least some of
them should be moved to L
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Tadej Janež
wrote:
> I'll fill a bug against plplot.
By the way, plplotd.pc lists quite a few things in its Libs: line --
without having a deeper look I think chances are that at least some of
them should be moved to Libs.private to avoid unnecessary linkage
bloat
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 16:11 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
> In this case (and usually IME) it's the latter. -lshp was added to
> plplotd.pc in plplot-devel-5.9.9-18.svn12474.fc20 but the
> corresponding shapelib-devel package dep wasn't.
I just discovered the same thing. Here is the diff of the c
On 08/20/2013 03:11 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 08/20/2013 01:15 PM, Tadej Janež wrote:
Inspecting the log files, I discovered that some BuildRequires pulled in
the shapelib package, which then caused the build to fail with:
"/usr/bin/ld:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 01:15 PM, Tadej Janež wrote:
>>
>> Inspecting the log files, I discovered that some BuildRequires pulled in
>> the shapelib package, which then caused the build to fail with:
>> "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lshp" since shapelib-d
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 14:01 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Could you diff config.log instead, please?
I'll have to get hold of a rawhide machine to do that, previously I just
diffed the build logs from koji.
> Do you link something statically, by chance?
This would be above my knowledge. How
On 08/20/2013 01:58 PM, Tadej Janež wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 13:22 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Probably the former. How does it detect shapelib support if linking to
its library fails?
It uses autoconf to check for dependencies, however, I couldn't find an
explicit check for shapelib in
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 13:22 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Probably the former. How does it detect shapelib support if linking to
> its library fails?
It uses autoconf to check for dependencies, however, I couldn't find an
explicit check for shapelib in configure.ac.
Comparing the output of
在 2013-8-20 PM7:15，"Tadej Janež" 写道：
was missing.
> Who should I blame:
> - the techne package which detected shapelib and tried to build against
> it, or
> - the package which introduced this dependency and/or did not also put
> in a Requires on shapelib-devel?
If it can be built on f19, I think
On 08/20/2013 01:15 PM, Tadej Janež wrote:
Hi!
The techne package FTBFS during the recent F20 mass rebuild, which I
fixed and pushed a new build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=455280
The same package failed to build yesterday:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?t
Hi!
The techne package FTBFS during the recent F20 mass rebuild, which I
fixed and pushed a new build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=455280
The same package failed to build yesterday:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5830172
Inspecting the log files, I di
11 matches
Mail list logo
